Establishing the Core Transport Network in Russia as a Foundation for Advancing Russia–China Cooperation along the Polar Silk Road

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2026-3-18

Keywords:

Northern Sea Route, Polar Silk Road, transport and logistics framework, backbone transport network, latitudinal and meridional routes, transport connectivity, Arctic, Russia-China cooperation

Abstract

Global logistics is being reshaped by sanctions pressure and Russia’s growing economic reorientation toward the East. Against this backdrop, this study examines Russia–China transport and logistics cooperation in the Arctic, focusing on how the Northern Sea Route can be linked to the Polar Silk Road. The article develops a matrix transport and logistics framework that integrates maritime, land, and inland waterway routes. Unlike linear transport corridors or conventional multimodal networks, this model treats the Northern Sea Route as a latitudinal backbone axis, connected to meridional railway and inland waterway routes. The study’s novelty lies in substantiating this matrix-based backbone network, which enables cargo flows to be redistributed and gives Russia’s inland regions better access to the global ocean. Methodologically, the study combines comparative index analysis (using the EDAS method), systemic analysis, and conceptual modelling. The empirical base includes quarterly UNCTADstat data for 2006–2024 on the LSCI and PLSCI indices, container throughput, shipbuilding, nationally flagged fleets, and certified seafarers. It also draws on academic publications from 2008–2025, analytical reports, and strategic documents from Russia and China. The findings show a marked asymmetry between the two countries: China ranks first among BRICS countries in maritime and port potential, while Russia ranks fourth. This gap shows up clearly in container throughput (246.6 million TEU for China versus 4.8 million TEU for Russia) and port connectivity (1,126 versus 159). Even so, Russia’s aggregate port PLSCI grew by roughly 61 % over 2006–2024. The study demonstrates that a “China — Trans-Siberian Railway — Arctic ports — Northern Sea Route — China” model could reduce empty container repositioning, strengthen the resilience of cargo flows, and diversify trade routes between the two countries. Scaling this model, however, will require synchronizing navigation regimes, developing port and rail infrastructure, expanding the container cargo base, and improving institutional coordination.

Author Biographies

Elena Yu. Ganshina, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of General and Project Management; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0162-6545  (49/2, Leningradsky Ave., Moscow, 125167, Russian Federation; е-mail: eyganshina@fa.ru).

Yuri A. Krupnov, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of General and Project Management; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-3747  (49/2, Leningradsky Ave., Moscow, 125167, Russian Federation; е-mail: yakrupnov@fa.ru).

References

Abdella, M., Hendricks, C., & Hua, X. (2025). Routing-Method Effects on Distance, Time, Fuel, and Emissions in Europe–Asia Trade: A Comparison of the Suez, Cape, and Northern Sea Route Corridors (arXiv:2512.01076). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01076 (Date of access: 22.01.2026).

Agarkov, S. A., & Ivanova, M. V. (2024). Spatial Aspects of Sustainable Development of Arctic Fuel-Energy Resources in the New World Order: Global Challenges and Solutions. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], (56), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2024.56.5 (In Russ.)

Aksenov, Y., Popova, E. E., Yool, A., & Nurser, A. J. G. (2017). On the Future Navigability of Arctic Sea Routes: High-Resolution Projections of the Arctic Ocean and Sea Ice. Marine Policy, 75, 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.027

Berkman, P. A., Vylegzhanin, A. N., & Young, O. R. (2016). Governing the Bering Strait Region: Current Status, Emerging Issues and Future Options. Ocean Development & International Law, 47 (2), 186–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2016.1159091

Bezrukov, L. (2019). Eurasian Continental Integration: Prerequisites and Difficulties. Central Asian Cooperation Review, 20 (4), 7–18. https://doi.org/ 0.37178/ca-c.20.4.01

Boile, M., Theofanis, S., & Mittal, N. (2008). Empty Marine Container Logistics: Facts, Issues and Management Strategies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44 (2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.12.003

Castrellon, J. P., Sanchez-Diaz, I., Roso, V., Altuntas-Vural, C., Rogerson, S., & Santén, V. (2023). Assessing the Eco-Efficiency Benefits of Empty Container Repositioning Strategies via Dry Ports. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 119, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103778

Cocuzza, E., Ignaccolo, M., Marinacci, C., Ricci, S., Twrdy, E., & Zanne, M. (2025). Sustainable Strategies for Ports and Maritime Logistics: A Methodological Approach to Green Transition. Sustainability, 17 (13), 5739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135739

Cullinane, K., & Khanna, M. (2000). Economies of Scale in Large Containerships: Optimal Size and Geographical Implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 8 (3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00010-7

Chupin, A., Morkovkin, D., Bolsunovskaya, M., Boyko, A., & Leksashov, A. (2024). Techno-Economic Sustainability Potential of Large-Scale Systems: Forecasting Intermodal Freight Transportation Volumes. Sustainability, 16 (3), 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031265

Danilova, I. V., Savelyeva, I. P., & Rezepin, A. V. (2022). Impact of Inter-Territorial Cohesion on the Development of Regional Economic Spaces. Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Regions], 18 (1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-3 (In Russ.)

Filimonova, I. V., Ivanova, M. V., Kuznetsova, E. A., & Koz’menko, A. S. (2023). Assessment of Effectiveness of New Economic Growth Centers in the Arctic. Arktika i Sever [Arctic and North], (50), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2023.50.66 (In Russ.)

Havnes, H. (2020). The Polar Silk Road and China’s Role in Arctic Governance. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v4i1.1166

Jier, Zh., & Boyarko, G. Yu. (2025). Development Problems and Prospects of the Tomtor Niobium-Rare Earth Deposit

in the Arctic Zone of Russia: Ecological and Economic Aspects. Arktika: Ekologiya i Ekonomika [Arctic Ecology and Economy], 15 (2(58)), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2025-2-226-237 (In Russ.)

Joseph, L., Giles, T., Nishatabbas, R., & Smith, T. (2021). A Techno-Economic Environmental Cost Model for Arctic Shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 151, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.022

Kashka, M. M., Irlitsa, L. A., Efanskaya, E. A., Matviishina, K. A., & Golovinskiy, S. A. (2021). The Role of the Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet in Achieving the Russian Nation’s Objective of Increasing the Volume of Cargo Flow in the Waters

of the Northern Sea Route. Arktika: Ekologiya i Ekonomika [Arctic Ecology and Economy], 11 (1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2021-1-101-110 (In Russ.)

Komarova, E. D., & Savinov, Yu. A. (2021). Container Transport Problems in China’s Foreign Trade. Rossiiskii Vneshchneekonomicheskii Vestnik [Russian Foreign Economic Journal], (11), 124–132. http://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2021-11-124-132 (In Russ.)

Kryukov, V. A., & Kolomak, E. A. (2021). Spatial Development of Russia: Main Problems and Approaches to the Solution. Nauchnye Trudy Vol’nogo Ekonomicheskogo Obshchestva Rossii [VEO of Russia], (1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-92-114 (In Russ.)

Li, W., Gao, F., & Guo, P. (2025). China–Russia Cooperation in Arctic Governance and Sustainable Development:

A Conference Report from the 13th China–Russia Arctic Workshop. Marine Policy, 175, 106649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106649

Liu, C., Fan, H., Zhang, X., Fan, H., & Miao, H. (2024). Impact of the Primorsky International Transport Corridor on the Hinterland Competition Between Ports in Northeast China and Russian Far East. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 52, 101084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101084

Liu, N., & Solski, J. J. (2022). The Polar Silk Road and the Future Governance of the Northern Sea Route. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35 (4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000516

Martynova, E. (2023). International Transport Corridors as a Factor in Forming the Greater Eurasian Partnership. Rossiya i Novye Gosudarstva Evrazii [Russia and New States of Eurasia], (3(60)), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2023-3-68-77 (In Russ.)

Melia, N., Haines, K., & Hawkins, E. (2016). Sea ice decline and 21st century trans-Arctic shipping routes. Geophysical Research Letters, 43 (18), 9720–9728. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069315

Miler, R. K., Wach-Kloskowska, M., & Akoel, A. (2023). Determinants of Further Development and Management

of Modern Global Maritime Containerization (Redefinition after Covid-19 and War in Ukraine). The Business and Management Review, 14 (1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.24052/BMR/V14NU01/ART-04

Neustroeva, A. R. (2025). Problems and Prospects for the Development of Container Transportation Between Russia and China. Kitai v Mirovoi i Regional’noi Politike. Istoriya i Sovremennost’ [China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity], 30 (30), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.48647/ICCA.2025.73.99.024 (In Russ.)

Potravny, I., Novoselov, A., Novoselova, I., Chávez Ferreyra, K. Y., & Gassiy, V. (2022). Route Selection for Minerals’ Transportation to Ensure Sustainability of the Arctic. Sustainability, 14 (23), 16039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316039

Schøyen, H., & Bråthen, S. (2011). The Northern Sea Route Versus the Suez Canal: Cases from Bulk Shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 19 (4), 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.003

Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge, 840. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891742

Vinokurov, E. (2014). Emerging Eurasian Continental Integration: Trade, Investment, and Infrastructure. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 6 (1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910113511194

Wang, G., & Chen, M. (2025). Performance Evaluation and Strategic Analysis of Logistics Development for China Railway Express: A Spatial Connectivity Perspective. Systems, 13 (3), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030166

Xu, P., & Zhao, H. (2025). Geo-Economic Priorities and New Emphasis in the Partnership Between China and Russia

in Changing World Order. Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Regions], 21 (3), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-3-2

Yu, Q., Xiao, Y., Wang, G., & Cui, D. (2024). Sustainable Development of the China Railway Express under the Belt and Road Initiative: Focusing on Infrastructure Reliability and Trade Facilitation. Sustainability, 16 (18), 8167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188167

Zeng, Q., Lu, T., Lin, K.-C., Yuen, K. F., & Li, K. X. (2020). The Competitiveness of Arctic Shipping over Suez Canal and China–Europe Railway. Transport Policy, 86, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.11.005

Zhang, Y., Sun, X., Zha, Y., Wang, K., & Chen, C. (2023). Changing Arctic Northern Sea Route and Transpolar Sea Route: A Prediction of Route Changes and Navigation Potential Before Mid-21st Century. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11 (12), 2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122340

Zhao, Y., Liu, S., Zhou, J., & Ma, Y. (2024). Economic and Environmental Feasibility of the Northern Sea Route for Container Service: Impact by Ice-Besetting Events. Maritime Policy & Management, 51 (1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2084789

Additional Files

Published

29.09.2026

How to Cite

Ganshina , E. Y., & Krupnov , Y. A. (2026). Establishing the Core Transport Network in Russia as a Foundation for Advancing Russia–China Cooperation along the Polar Silk Road. Economy of Regions, 22(3), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2026-3-18

Issue

Section

Investment Projects in the Industries and Infrastructure of Greater Eurasia