Industrial Policy Priorities of Russia in the Context of Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Part 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-3-9Keywords:
industrial policy, fourth industrial revolution, digital economy, new priorities, tools of industrial policy, subject of industrial policy, social and ethical responsibility, leadershipAbstract
The article emphasizes the relevance of the digital economy development as one of the most important directions of the fourth industrial revolution. It is significant for a breakthrough in science and technology, social and economic development. I prove that the industrial policy is a reliable instrument for supporting digital economy. The followingfactors define the priorities of industrial policy: the level of socio-economic development of the country, the existing model of economic development, an image of the country’s future. I consider the evolution of the industrial policy priorities in Russia. In current situation, the essentially new priority is the support of digital economy. I find that pro-active digital economy formulation and management in collaboration of all branches of the government as well as the development of digital economy together with sector programmes and programmes of innovative development, etc. are of great importance. I have suggested steps, which could make the Industry Development Fund to support the new priorities connected with digital economy development. Furthermore, I have developed proposals on adjusting provisions, which define the possibility to apply special investment contracts for stimulating the digital economy development. I have defined the main directions of staffing the digital economy. The article emphasizes that «digital transformation of the industry» radically changes the idea targets and subjects of industrial policy. So-called related industries, as the association of goods, individuals, and technologies within the industrial system, the structures based on such special type of business models as technological platforms and the human needs become a new targets of the industrial policy. During the fourth industrial revolution, a system of interaction between federal and regional authorities and various business associations as well as civil society institutions becomes the main subject of industrial policy. This predetermines a multi-actor character of the industrial policy. The requirements to leaders of the state and business structures have increased. Therefore, their responsibility for preventing negative social and ethical consequences of the implementation of new technology solutions.References
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Buguin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P. & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive Technologies: Advances that will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy. McKinsey Global Institute, 164. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/disruptive-technologies (date of access: 24.05.2018).
Yakovleva, N. G. (2017). Promyshlennaya politika v ekonomike XXI veka. Sravnitelnyy analiz opyta Evropeyskogo soyuza i Rossii [Industrial policy in the economy of the 21st century: comparative analysis of E.U. — Russia experience]. Ekonomicheskoye vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], 3(53), 73–78. (In Russ.)
Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015–12–12/fourth-industrial-revolution (date of access: 24.05.2018).
Gaponenko, N. V. (2008). Forsayt. Teoriya. Metodologiya. Opyt [Forsythe. Theory. Methodology. Experience]. Moscow: Yuniti-Dana Publ., 239. (In Russ.)
Albright, R. (2002). A Roadmapping Perspective: Science-Driven Technologies. Global Advanced Technologies Innovation Workshop, Zurich. Retrieved from: http://www.albrightstrategy.com/papers/A_Roadmapping_Perspective-Albright-09–26–02.pdf (date of access: 24.05.2018).
Tatarkin, A. I., Romanova, O. A. & Akberdina, V. V. (2014). Promyshlennost industrialnogo regiona. Potentsial, prioritety i dinamika ekonomiko-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [Industry of industrial region. Potential, priorities and dynamics of economic and technological development]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN Publ., 632. (In Russ.)
Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 356.
Gaydar, E. (2005). Dolgoye vremya. Rossiya i mir. Ocherki ekonomicheskoy istorii [Long time. Russia and the world. Review of economic history]. Moscow: Delo Publ., 97. (In Russ.)
Leksin, V. (2009). Rossiya do, vo vremya i posle globalnogo krizisa [Russia before, in time and after global crisis]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal], 7–8, 3–34. (In Russ.)
Rossiya XXI veka: obraz zhelaemogo zavtra [Russia of 21st century: image of the desirable tomorrow]. (2010). Moscow: Ekon-Inform Publ., 66. (In Russ.)
Grinberg, R. S., Boldyrev, Yu. Yu., Delyagin M. G. & Dmitrieva, O. G. (2009). Po povodu pravitelstvennoy antikrizisnoy programmy [Concerning the government anti-recessionary program]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal], 3–4, 3–16 (In Russ.)
Sablin, K. S. (2010). Institutsionalnaya teoriya gosudarstva. Gosudarstvo razvitiya v raznykh institutsionalnykh usloviyakh [The state of development in different institutional settings]. Journal of institutional studies [Zhurnal institutsionalnykh issledovaniy], 2(4), 30–38. (In Russ.)
Gorodetsky, A. E. (2017). Promyshlennaya politika: vyzovy novogo industrializma i neizbezhnost adekvatnogo politiko-ekonomicheskogo vybora [Industrial policy: challenges of new industrialism and inevitability of making an adequate political and economic choice]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], 4(54), 17–29. (In Russ.)
Abdrakhmanova, G. I., Bakhtin, P. D., Gokhberg, L. M. et al. (2017). Reyting innovatsionnogo razvitiya subektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Vyp. 5 [Rating of innovative development of territorial subjects of the Russian Federation. Issue 5]. Moscow: NIU VSHE Publ., 260. (In Russ.)
Kurakova, N., Tsvetkova, L. & Zinov, V. (2016). Patentnyy landshaft RF, sozdannyy rezidentami strany: analiz vyyavlennykh problem [Russian patent landscape, created by the residents of the country: analysis of the identified issues]. Ekonomika nauki [Economics of Science], 2(1), 64–79. (In Russ.)
Rakhmanov, B. (2017). Kapitalisticheskie klassy vedushchikh stran mira. Sravnitelnyy analiz [Capitalist Classes of the Leading Countries of the World: a Comparative Analysis]. EKO [ECO], 10, 62–84. (In Russ.)
Kortov, S. V., Shulgin, D. B., Tolmachev, D. B. & Egarmina, A. D. (2017). Analiz tekhnologicheskikh trendov na osnove postroeniya patentnykh landshaftov [Technology Trends Analysis Using Patent Landscaping]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 13(3), 935–947. (In Russ.)
Romanova, O. & Sirotin, D. V. (2015). New Technological Shape of Basic Branches of RF Industrial Regions. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 5(41), 27–44.
Towards knowledge driven reindusrialisation: European Competitiveness Report. (2013). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 196.
Feiguine, G. & Solovjova, J. (2014). ICT investment and internationalization of the Russian economy. International economics and economic policy, 11, 231–250.
Naude, W. (2010, September). Industrial Policy: Old and New Issues. Working Paper No. 2010/106. United Nations University. World Institute for the Development Economics Research. Retrieved from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/54072/1/63687043X.pdf (date of access: 24.05.2018).
Manturov, D. V. (2017). Gosudarstvo kak investor. Izmenenie roli gosudarstva v finansirovanii promyshlennosti za poslednie 20 let [The state as an investor: a shift in the role of a state in financing industry in the past 20 years]. Ekonomicheskoye vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], 2(52), 4–16. (In Russ.)
Vertakova, Yu. V., Plotnikova, N. A. & Plotnikov, V. A. (2017). Promyshlennaya politika Rossii. Napravlennost i instrumentariy [Russia’s industrial policy: directions and instruments]. Ekonomicheskoye vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], 3(53), 49–56. (In Russ.)
Popov, V. V. (2014). Promyshlennaya politika — kak opredelit otrasli, kotorye nado podderzhivat [Industrial Policy — How to Choose Industries that Should Be Supported]. Zhurnal novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2(22), 186–189. (In Russ.)
Vazhneyshaya zadacha — sozdanie usloviy dlya razvitiya ekonomik rossiyskikh regionov [The major task — creation of conditions for the development of economies of Russian regions]. (2018). Finansy [Finances], 2, 3–6. (In Russ.)
Rooney, D., Hearn, G. & Kastelle, T. (Eds). Handbook on the Knowledge Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 256.
Smit, A. (1997). Teoriya nravstvennykh chuvstv [The Theory of Moral Sentiments]. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russ.)
Nowak, M. A. & Highfield, R. (2012). SuperCooperators: altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. N.-Y Free Press, 352.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Olga Aleksandrovna Romanova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
