Electricity Consumption Growth in Russian Regions as a Factor of Their Socio-Economic Development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-2-15

Keywords:

specific electricity consumption, structural stability of the economy, technocenosis theory, labour productivity

Abstract

The indicator of specific (per capita) electricity consumption (SEC) is stabilising in developed countries and increasing in developing economies. At least since the mid-2000s, the difference between the two groups of countries in terms of available power has been decreasing. In contrast to this trend, the transition of Russia to a market economy is characterised by the divergence of regions in terms of SEC. SEC of regions, being on average similar to that of the Netherlands, France, Germany, Great Britain, began to differ by 20 times. The technocenosis theory shows the need to change this negative trend. The low electricity consumption of developing countries depends on their inability to increase its production. In Russia, the problem is due to the low potential of the consumption sector, primarily in regions with SEC below 4 MWh/person per year. The solution of this macroeconomic problem, namely, the reduction of the existing differentiation in regional specific electricity consumption will help maintain the structural stability of the Russian economy and ensure its functioning in the context of external environment changes. Creation of conditions for the energy consumption development in industrial and agricultural enterprises is not a sectoral task of the electric power industry. Considering the sanctions imposed on Russia, structural stability of the national economy can be increased by improving the investment climate resulting from a decline in electricity prices for new non-residential consumers in regions with SEC below
the level of developing countries. For these subsidy depending “outsider” regions, an increase in the availability
of electricity, rather than the construction of new energy facilities, stimulates the labour productivity growth, re-industrialisation, and emergence of growth points. 

Author Biography

Sergey A. Nekrasov, Leading Economic Mathematical Institute of RAS

Doctor of Sciences (Econ.), Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Research Associate; Scopus Author ID: AAC-6526-2020; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7649-0515 (47, Nakhimovskiy Ave., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; e-mail: San693@mail.ru).

References

Barbieri, P., Ciabuschi, F., Fratocchi, L. & Vignoli, M. (2018). What do we know about manufacturing reshoring? Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 1, 79–122. DOI: 10.1108/JGOSS-02–2017–0004

Bertoldi, P. (2017). Are current policies promoting a change in behaviour, conservation and sufficiency? An analysis of existing policies and recommendations for new and effective policies. In: ECEEE Summer Study proceedings (p. 201–211). Stockholm: ECEEE.

Bogdanov, A. A. (1989). Tektologiya. Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka. V 2-kh knigakh [Tektology: The General Science of Organization. In 2 volumes]. Moscow : Economics, 304, 352. (In Russ.)

Bushuev, V. V. (2006). Energeticheskiy potentsial i ustoychivoe razvitie [Energy potential and sustainable development]. Moscow: IAC «Energy», 320. (In Russ.)

Coe, N. M. & Yeung, H. W.-Ch. (2019). Global production networks: mapping recent conceptual developments. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 775–801. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbz018.

Fufaev, V. V. (2006). Ekonomicheskie tsenozy organizatsiy [Economic cenoses of organizations]. Moscow, Abakan: Center for System Research, 86. (In Russ.)

Gnatyuk, V. I. (2005). Zakon optimalnogo postroeniya tekhnotsenozov [The law of optimal construction of technocenoses]. M.: TSU, Center for System Research, 384. (In Russ.)

Kondrat’ev, V. B. (2017). Reshoring as a form of reindustrialization. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 61(9), 54–65. (In Russ.)

Krzhizhanovsky, G. (1920). Osnovnye zadachi elektrifikatsii Rossii [The main tasks of electrification of Russia]. Kharkov: All-Ukrainian State Publishing House, 60. (In Russ.)

Kudrin, B. I. (2001). Electricity: The annual rating of Russian regions by electricity consumption for 1990–1999. Elektrika, 6, 3–12. (In Russ.)

Kudrin, B. I. (2006). Klassika tekhnicheskikh tsenozov. Obshchaya i prikladnaya tsenologiya. Vyp. 31. «Tsenologicheskie issledovaniya [Classic technical cenoses. General and applied cenology, 31, «Cenological studies»]. Tomsk: TSU, Center for System Research, 220. (In Russ.)

Kudrin, B. I. (2010). Energy efficiency: Rating of Russian regions by electricity consumption for 1990–2010. Elektrika, 8, 3–15. (In Russ.)

Kutovoy, G. P. (2017). 80 years old: a formula for success. Regionalnaya energetika i energosberezhenie [Regional Energy and Energy Saving], 5–6, 23–26. (In Russ.)

Kuzminov, A. N. (2007). Cenological features of regional market modeling as a resource allocation mechanism. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Economic Herald of Rostov State University], 5(4–2), 127–131. (In Russ.)

Kuzminov, A. N. (2009). Cenologiсal model of the region resistance management. Ekonomika region [Economy of region], 7(2), 28–32. (In Russ.)

Maza, A. & Villaverde, J. (2008). The world per capita electricity consumption distribution: Signs of convergence? Energy policy, 36(11), 4255–4261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.036.

Nekrasov, S. A. & Grachev, I. D. (2020). Renewable energy: prospects for energy development correction in Russia. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 1, 99–109. (In Russ.)

Nekrasov, S. A. & Shevchenko, I. S. (2011). An alternative approach to determining the required electricity generation in the Russian Federation. Energetika Tatarstana [Energy of Tatarstan], 1, 50–56. (In Russ.)

Nekrasov, S. A. (2011). Prospects of growth of electricity consumption in Russia on the basis of international comparative analysis. Natsionalnye interesy. Prioritety i bezopasnost [National interests: priorities and security], 7(44), 37–50. (In Russ.)

Rosenow, J., Fawcett, T., Eyre, N. & Oikonomou, V. (2016). Energy efficiency and the policy mix. Building Research & Information, 44, 562–574.

Shove, E. (2017). What is wrong with energy efficiency? Building Research & Information, 46, 779–789. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746.

Simonov, N. S. (2017). Nachalo elektroenergetiki Rossiyskoy imperii i SSSR, kak problema tekhnotsenoza [The beginning of the electric power industry of the Russian Empire and the USSR as a problem of technocenosis]. Moscow: Infra-Engineering, 640. (In Russ.)

Tregenna, F. (2016). Deindustrialization and Premature Deindustrialization. In: J. Ghosh, R. Kattel, E. Reinert (Eds.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development (pp. 710–728). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781782544685.00046

Velikhov, E. P. (2011). Energy in the economy of the world of the XXI century. Trudy Moskovskogo fiziko-tekhnicheskogo institute [Proceedings of Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology], 3(4), 6–15. (In Russ.)

Wilk, R. (2002). Consumption, human needs, and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 12, 5–13.

Published

30.06.2022

How to Cite

Nekrasov, S. A. (2022). Electricity Consumption Growth in Russian Regions as a Factor of Their Socio-Economic Development. Economy of Regions, 18(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-2-15

Issue

Section

Research articles