Economic and Ecological Evaluation of Land Use Change (Evidence from Karelia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-8Keywords:
ecosystem services, land degradation, environmental economics, development scenarios, wetlands, peat mining, animal husbandry, comparative analysis, Karelia, RussiaAbstract
Land use change and a shift in economic activity often bring to unpredictable consequences for local ecosystems. There is a necessity of making preliminary evaluation and analysis of comparing the different types of economic and ecological transformation, including cost and benefit analysis, not only for business and local population, but for the whole environment. We give an example of a particular animal husbandry farm in Karelia and show how potential change in economic specialization can be effective on a 10 years horizon. Among other land use types, we chose peat mining and wetland conservation. Each type of activities was complexly evaluated with different types of costs and benefits. In the paper, we use a method of land use change evaluation including the value of ecosystem services. The monetary values of ecosystem services are given with the respect to foreign analogues and taking into account local realities and prices. Our results have shown that the most beneficial for the society and the environment is wetland conservation, due to their berries picking service, which are highly appreciated on the market, and due to low costs for the third parties, since wetlands contain regulative and refinery services for local ecosystems. As a contrary peat mining is a profitable business, but pollutes the environment because of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The current specialization for animal husbandry is neither an optimal solution because of low profitability of the chosen farm. The results of the research can be used for optimization in regional politics in the sphere of agriculture and environment economics in order to protect the ecological balance between human activities and nature.References
Von Braun, J., Gerber, N., Mirzabaev, A. & Nkonya, E. (2013). The Economics of Land Degradation. ZEF Working Paper Series, 1–35.
Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. (1996). Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science, 271, 785–788. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5250.785.
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G. & Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277, 504–509. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.504.
Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D. & Swackhamer, D. (2001). Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 292, 281–284. doi: 10.1126/science.1057544.
Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W. & Balmford, A. (2005). Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science, 307, 550–555. doi: 10.1126/science.1106049.
Foley, J., Ramankutty, N., Balzer, C., Bennett, E. M., Brauman, K. A., Carpenter, S. R., Cassidy, E., Gerber, J., Hill, J., Johnston, M., Monfreda, C., Mueller, N.D., O’Connell, C., Polasky, S., Ray, D.K., Rockström, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., West, P.C. & Zaks, D.P.M. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10452.
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O’Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes,
B. & Sirotenko, O. (2007). Agriculture. Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A. (Eds). Climate Change: Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York : Cambridge University Press, 851.
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 20260–20264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108.
Johnson, J. M. F., Franzluebbers, A. J., Weyers, S. L. & Reicosky, D. C. (2007). Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Pollution, 150, 107–124. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.030.
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D. & Gordon, L. J. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12, 1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461–0248.2009.01387.
Turner, R.K., Pearce, D. & Bateman, I. (1994). Environmental Economics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 328.
Costanza, R., dArge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., Oneill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.
Pattanayak, S. & Kramer, R. (2001). Pricing ecological services: Willingness to pay for draught mitigation from watershed protection in eastern Indonesia. Water Resources Research, 37(3), 771–778.
Jolejole, C., Swinton, S. & Lupi, F. (2009, July 26–28). Incentives to supply enhanced ecosystem services from cropland. Conference paper of Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting. Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Retrieved from: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/49356. (date of access: 5 sent. 2016).
Lankia, T., Neuvonen, M., Pouta, E. & Seivanen, T. (2014, August 26–29). Willingness to contribute to the management of recreational quality on private lands in Finland. Conference paper of International Congress. Ljubljana, Slovenia. Retrieved from: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/182651. (date of access: 5 sent. 2016).
Van der Ploeg, S. & de Groot, R. S. (2010). The TEEB Valuation Database — a searchable database of 1310 estimates of monetary values of ecosystem services. Wageningen: The Netherlands: Foundation for Sustainable Development, 26.
De Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L & van Beukering, P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50–61. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R. & Blair, R. (1995). Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits. Science, 267, 1117–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5201.1117.
Nkonya, E., Anderson, W., Kato, E., Koo, J., Mirzabaev, A., von Braun, J., Meyer, S. (2016). Global cost of land degradation in Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement. Nkonya, E, Mirzabaev, A & von Braun, J. (Eds). Ch. 5, pp 117–165. Springer, Netherlands, 695. DOI 10. 1007/978–3–319–19168–3_6.
Nkonya, E., Gerber, N., Baumgartner, P., von Braun, J., De Pinto, A., Graw, V., Kato, E., Kloos, J., Walter, T. (2011). The Economics of Land Degradation: toward an integrated global assessment. Heidhues, F., von Braun, J., and Zeller, M. (Eds). Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang GmbH, 262.
Johnson, K., Polasky, S., Nelson, E. & Pennington, D. (2012). Uncertainty in ecosystem services valuation and implications for assessing land use tradeoffs: An agricultural case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Ecological Economics, 79, 71–79. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.020.
Stoorvogel, J. J., Antle, J. M., Crissman, C. C. & Bowen, W. (2004). The Tradeoff Analysis Model: Integrated Bio-Physical and Economic Modeling of Agricultural Production Systems. Agricultural Systems, 80, 43–66. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.06.002.
DeFries, R. S., Foley, J. A. & Asner, G. P. (2004). Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), 249–257. DOI: 10.1890/1540–9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2.
Morozova, R. M. (1991). Lesnyye pochvy Karelii [Forest soils of Karelia]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 184. (In Russ.)
Nkonya, E., von Braun, J., Mirzabaev, A., Le, Q., Kwon, H., Kato, E., Kirui, O., Gerber, N. (2013). Economics of Land Degradation Initiative: Methods and Approach for Global and National Assessments (Basic standards for comparable assessments). Draft for discussion in ZEF, University of Bonn, 1–34.
Yudina, V. & Maksimova, T. (2005). Osobennosti plodonosheniya yagodnykh rasteniy na bolotakh Karelii [Peculiarities of fruitage of berries on the mires of southern Karelia]. Trudy nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Transactions of Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Petrozavodsk: Karelskiy NTs RAN Publ., 8, 163–168. (In Russ.)
Yudina, V. & Maksimova, T. (2005). Dinamika urozhaynosti klyukvy bolotnoy v Yuzhnoy Karelii [Dynamics of yielding capacity of small cranberry in southern Karelia]. Ekologiya [Russian journal of ecology], 4, 264–268. (In Russ.)
Dubgaard, A., Kallesøe, M. F., Petersen, M. L. & Ladenburg, J. (2000). Cost-benefit analysis of the Skjern River Project. Research report sonducted for the Danish Forest and Nature Agency as part of the investigations on biodiversity and nature protection by the Wilhjelm Committee, 1–40.
Kosz, M. (1996). Valuing riverside wetlands: the case of the “Donau-Auen” national park. Ecological Economics, 16(2), 109–127. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921–8009(95)00058–5.
Anielski, M. & Wilson, S. J. (2002). Counting Canada’s natural capital: assessing the real value of Canada’s boreal ecosystems. Canadian Boreal initiative, Pembina institute, Canadian, 1–90.
Alm, J., Talanov, A., Saarnio, S., Silvola, J., Ikkonen, E., Aaltonen, H., Nykänen, H. & Martikainen, P. J. (1997). Reconstruction of the carbon balance for microsites in a boreal oligotrophic pine fen, Finland. Oecologia, 110(3), 423–431. doi:10.1007/s004420050177
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 A.S. Strokov, E.N. Yakubovich, P.V. Krasilnikov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
