Priority Development Areas in the Context of the Economic Security of Macro-Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-18Keywords:
priority development areas, economic security, macro-region, Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, the Far East, Primorsky Krai, trend forecast, assessment of the efficiency of priority development areas, indicators of the effectiveness of priority development areas, correlation and regression analysisAbstract
In March 2017, after the adoption of the Russian Federation Economic Security Strategy until 2030, the need for strengthening the security of the subjects of the Russian Federation including macro-regions became relevant. In this aspect, the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation deserves special attention as it is a strategically important not only for economic, but also the national security of the country. Therefore, at the present stage of the state development, the substantiation of the special measures for the stimulation of the macro-regions development to ensure its economic security is a relevant and priority task. The authors have analysed the intermediate results of some priority development areas since their creation in 2014. We have concluded that not enough time has passed to estimate whether this mechanism was effective or not in stimulating the regional growth and development of the business. Therefore, despite the traditional financial indicators of investment efficiency, we have included the estimation of quantitative change of one productive indicator depending on the change of a number of the parameters influencing this indicator in the assessment of the efficiency of priority development areas. We have estimated this quantitative change by means of the instruments of correlation and regression, and trend modelling. To apply this approach, we have designed a dependency model of the index of industrial production of Primorsky Krai as one of the indicators of the Economic Security Strategy on revealed factors, which cause the growth or decrease of this index. The economic interpretation of the model outputs consists in the following. When investments into fixed capital increase by 1 million rubbles, the index of industrial production in the region grows by 0,9 %. When the indicator of the real monetary income of the population increases by 1 thousand rubbles, the index of industrial production in the region decreases by 1,36 %. Trend forecasting has allowed to define such indicators as the investments into fixed capital and the real income of the population continue to change, the index of industrial production will show a steady downward trend for three next years. This proves that the policy of management of priority development areas in Primorsky Krai is inefficient. The research has concluded that from the perspective of ensuring the economic security of the macro-region, the creation of priority development areas in the Arctic will be effective only when all shortcomings of its functioning are eliminated. It is defined on the basis of the analysis of the corresponding experience of the Far East. High-quality forecasts will contribute to a positive impact from the creation of priority development area not only on the socio-economic sphere of the Arctic, but also on the strengthening the economic security of the macro-region in general. The results of the research can be used for the regional governance, monitoring of regional economic security, as well as for the increase in the scientific validity of state decisions.References
Belyaevskaya-Plotnik, L. A. (2017). Analiz normativnykh pravovykh aktov v sfere razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii v tselyakh obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti makroregiona [Analysis of Normative Legal Acts in the Sphere of Development of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation in Order to Provide the Economic Stability of the Macroregion]. Nauchnyye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika [Scientific Research and Development. Economics], 5(5), 46–50. doi:10.12737/274.39158261. (In Russ.)
Belyaevskaya-Plotnik, L. A. & Sorokina, N. Yu. (2017). Podkhody k otsenke urovnya ekonomicheskoy integratsii regionov v sisteme natsionalnoy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Approaches to assessment of level of economic integration of regions in the system of a national economic safety]. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic sciences], 6(151), 39–42. (In Russ.)
Chichkanov, V. P. & Belyaevskaya-Plotnik, L. A. (2016). Analiz podkhodov k otsenke regionalnykh protsessov formirovaniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [Analysis of the Approaches to the Assessment of Regional Processes of Formation of Social and Economic Security]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 12(3), 654–669. doi: 10.17059/2016–3-4. (In Russ.)
Belyaevskaya-Plotnik, L. A. (2009). Ispolzovanie stsenarnogo podkhoda pri obosnovanii napravleniy gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya nalogooblozheniem [The use of scenario approach at the substantiation of the directions of state regulation by the taxation]. Biznes Inform [Business Inform], 12(2), 116–119. (In Russ.)
Senchagov, V. K. (2002). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost: geopolitika, globalizatsiya, samosokhranenie i razvitie [Economic security: geopolitics, globalization, self-preservation and development]. Moscow: ZAO “Finstatinform” Publ., 128. (In Russ.)
Ismagilov, R. F., Salnikov, V. P. & Stepashin, S. V. (2001). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost Rossii. Kontseptsiya. Pravovye osnovy. Politika [Economic security of Russia. Concept. Legal foundations. Policy.]. St. Petersburg: Fond “Universitet”, 288. (In Russ.)
Senchagov, V. K. & Ivanov, E. A. (2015). Struktura mekhanizma sovremennogo monitoringa ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossii. Institut ekonomiki RAN [Structure of the mechanism of modern monitoring of economic security of Russia. Institute of Economics of RAS]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN. Tsentr finansovykh issledovaniy Publ., 46. (In Russ.)
Utkin, E. A. & Denisov, A. F. (2002). Gosudarstvennoye i regionalnoye upravlenie [Public and regional government]. Moscow: IKF “EKMOS”, 320. (In Russ.)
Barsukov, V. N. (2016). Trudovaya aktivnost naseleniya pensionnogo vozrasta kak faktor sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territorii [Labor Activity of the Population of Retirement Age as a Factor in Socio-Economic Development of the Territory]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 1(43), 195–213. doi: 10.15838/esc/2016.1.43.13. (In Russ.)
Glazyev, S. Yu. & Lokosov, V. V. (2012). Otsenka predelno kriticheskikh znacheniy pokazateley sostoyaniya rossiyskogo obshchestva i ikh ispolzovanie v upravlenii sotsialno-ekonomicheskim razvitiem [Assessment of the critical threshold values of the indicators of the state of Russian society and their use in the socio-economic development management]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyye peremeny. Fakty. Tendentsii. Prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 4, 22–41. (In Russ.)
Kondratiev, V. V. (2012). Rol monitoringa v obespechenii ustoychivogo razvitiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh protsessov v regione [Monitoring role in ensuring sustainable development of socio-economic processes in a region]. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic Sciences], 2(87), 168–171. (In Russ.)
Smirnov, M. A. (2015). Territorii operezhayushchego razvitiya. Vysokie riski i neobkhodimost aktivnoy otraslevoy gosudarstvennoy politiki [Advanced development territories: high risks and the need for an active sectoral policy of the State]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya [Financial Analytics: Science and Experience], 8(16), 58–68. (In Russ.)
Loginov, D. A. (2017). Puti obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti rossiyskikh regionov v usloviyakh nedostatochnoy ekonomicheskoy aktivnosti [Ways to suuport economic security of Russian regions in the conditions of insufficient economic activity]. Innovatsionnoye razvitie ekonomiki [Innovative Development of Economy], 4(40), 266–271. (In Russ.)
Goridko, N. P. (2012). Regressionnoye modelirovanie inflyatsionnykh protsessov [Regression modeling of inflationary processes]. Moscow: RosNOU Publ., 248. (In Russ.)
Nizhegorodtsev, R. M. (2011). Neravnovesnaya dinamika makrosistem i mekhanizmy preodoleniya mirovogo krizisa [Nonequilibrium dynamics of macrosystems and mechanisms to overcome world crisis]. Novocherkassk: NOK Publ., 100. (In Russ.)
Vlasov, M. P. & Shimko, P. D. (2005). Modelirovanie ekonomicheskikh protsessov [Modeling of economic processes]. Rostov on Don: Feniks Publ., 409. (In Russ.)
Granberg, A. G., Kistanov, V. V. & Adamesku, A. A. (2003). Gosudarstvenno-territorialnoye ustroystvo Rossii [State and territorial organization of Russia]. Moscow: DeKA Publ., 448. (In Russ.)
Fujita, M. & Thisse, J. (2003). Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Losses from it? The Japanese Economic Review, 54(2), 121–145. DOI:10.1111/1468–5876.00250.
Beugelsdijk, S., Klasing, M. J. & Milionis. P. (2017). Regional economic development in Europe: the role of total factor productivity. Regional studies. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00343404.2017.1334118 (date of access: 11.12.2017). doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1334118.
Acemoglu, D. & Dell, M. (2010). Productivity differences between and within countries. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), 169–188. doi:10.1257/mac.2.1.169.
Akcomak, I. S., Webbink, D. & ter Weel, B. (2016). Why did the Netherlands develop so early? The legacy of the brethren of the common life. Economic Journal, 126(593), 821–860. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12193.
Beugelsdijk, S., Klasing, M. J. & Milionis, P. (2017). Value diversity and regional economic development. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. doi:10.1111/sjoe.12253.
Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H. & von Ehrlich, M. (2013). Absorptive capacity and the growth and investment effects of regional transfers: A regression discontinuity design with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(4), 29–77. doi: 10.1257/pol.5.4.29.
Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 107–182. doi: 10.2307/2534639.
Kvasov, I. N. (2009). Adaptatsiya molodezhi k predprinimatelskoy deyatelnosti kak odna iz osnov ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona [Adaptation of the youth to business activity as one of the bases of regional economic security]. Natsionalnyye interesy. Prioritety i bezopasnost [National interests. Priorities and security], 18, 37–41. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 V.P. Chichkanov, L.A. Belyaevskaya-Plotnik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

