Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-6Keywords:
modern industrial policy, institutional environment, fundamental science, digital economy, humanitarian and technological revolution, industrial development fund, special investment contract, cooperation agreements between Industrial Development Fund and the regions, ethical responsibility, philosophy of personalismAbstract
The article substantiates the importance of industrial policy as one of the basic institutions shaping the institutional environment of any country. We demonstrated that institutional factors for accelerating the processes of social and economic development are more important for the Russian economy than for the world economy. We revealed institutional innovations in scientific support of implementing industrial policy priorities. In modern conditions, the basic institution of development is fundamental science. From these positions we analysed institutional innovations in the field of fundamental science. Then we described the innovations that allow industrial policy’s tools to maintain the direction of development. This direction is defined and shaped not only by «big challenges», but public needs, too. The analysis demonstrated that nowadays industrial policies around the world aim to support the development of digital technologies. We considered the stages of the digital economy’s development. Then, we hypothesised that a particularly important consequence of digital transformation is the formation of the prerequisites for changing the entire system of social relations defining the states institutional framework and industrial policy’s economic content. We emphasised that the development of the sharing economy (as one of the new trends in the world economic development) will significantly influence the change of industrial policy’s priorities and tools. The analysis of the use of the industrial policy’s tools in Russia showed the effectiveness of using the Industrial Development Fund (IDF). Furthermore, we structured the expected conceptual changes of the terms for concluding Special Investment Contracts (SIC). The analysis of the distribution of loans from IDF and SIC revealed a large discrepancy between the activities of the regions in obtaining the aforementioned loans. We noted there is a high probability of unpredictable consequences of digital technologies not only in the economic development of society, but also in the possible transformation of the universal «lifeworld». Finally, we emphasised that in the context of the digital state’s formation, the search for a balance between technological and moral and ethical aspects in the processes of implementing industrial policy becomes urgent.References
Hinssen, P. (2011). The New Normal: Explore the Limits of the Digital World. Teilt, Lannoo Publishers, 202.
Pack, H. & Saggi, K. (2006). Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey. World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), 267–297.
Beath, J. (2002). UK Industrial Policy: Old Tunes on New Instruments? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 221−239.
Warwick, K. (2013). Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 2, OECD Publishing, 56. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4869clw0xp-en (Date of access: 03.13.2019).
Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nishchety [Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty]. Trans. from English. Moscow: AST, 720. (In Russ.)
Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. KSG Working Paper. No. RWP04–047. Cambridge, Massachusetts: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 57.
Afontsev, S. (2019). Novye tendentsii v razvitii mirovoy ekonomiki [New trends in global economy]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 5, 36–46. DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2019–63–5-36–46 (In Russ.)
Dynkin, A. A. (2019). Sotsialno-gumanitarnoe izmerenie otvetov na bolshie voprosy [Social and humanitarian measurement of responses to grand challenges]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk], 4(89), 384–389. DOI: 10.31857/S0869–5873894384–389. (In Russ.)
Kalyaev, I. A. (2019). Prioritet nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya “Perekhod k peredovym tsifrovym, intellektualnym proizvodstvennym tekhnologiyam, robotizirovannym sistemam, novym materialam i sposobam konstruirovaniya, sozdanie system obrabotki bolshykh obemov dannykh, mashinnogo obucheniya i iskustvennogo intellekta”. Vstypitelnoe slovo predsedatelya soveta po prioritety akademika RAN I. A. Kalyaeva [Priority of scientific and technological development «The transition to advanced digital, intelligent manufacturing technologies, robotic systems, new materials and methods of design, the creation of systems for processing large amounts of data, machine learning and artificial intelligence». Opening speech of the chairman of the priority council of RAS academician I. A. Kalyaev]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk], 4(89), 348–350. DOI: 10.31857/S0869–5873894348–350 (In Russ.)
Trader, T. (2018). Eni Takes the Lead Industrial Supercomputing. Retrieved from: https://www.hpcwire. com/2018/01/23/eni-takes-lead-industrial-supercomputing/ ( Date of access: 25.07.2019)
Voevodin, V. V. (2019). Superkompyuternye tekhnologii v tsifrovom mire: teoriya, praktika, obrazovanie [Supercomputing technologies in the digital world: theory, practice, education]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk], 4(89), 351–354. DOI: 10.31857/S0869–5873894351–354 (In Russ.)
Schaeffer, E. (2017). Industrial Manufacturers Must Extract More Value from Digital Innovation. Industry Week. Retrieved from: https://www.industryweek.com/technology/industrial-manufacturers-must-extract-more-value-digital-in- novation (Date of access: 01.08.2019).
Belova L. G. (2019). Vnedrenie tekhnologii blokchein v sheringovyyu ekonomiku peredovykh zarubezhnykh stran [The introduction of blockchain technology in the sharing economy of advanced foreign countries]. In: S. A. Afontseva, L. G. Belova (Eds.), Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nuchnoy konferentsii “Tsifrovizatsiya Evrazii”: novye perspektivy ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestvai razvitiya” (28 noyabrya, 2018) [Materials of the International Scientific Conference «Digitalization of Eurasia»: New Prospects for Economic Cooperation and Development. (November 28, 2018)] (pp. 67–78). Moscow: Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University M.V. Lomonosov. (In Russ.)
Romanova, O. A. (2018). Prioritety promyshlennoy politiki Rossii v kontekste vyzovov chetvertoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii. Chast 2 [Industrial Policy Priorities of Russia in the Context of Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Part 2]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 3(14), 806–819. DOI: 10.17059/2018–3-9 (In Russ.)
Romanova, O. A. & Ponomareva, A. O. (2019). Teoreticheskie, institutsionalnye I eticheskie osnovaaniya realizatsii sovremennoy promyshlennoy politiki. Chast 1 [Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part I]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 1(15), 13–28. DOI: 10.17059/2019–1-2 (In Russ.)
Smith, A. (1997). Teoriya nravstvennykh chuvstv [Theory of moral sentiments]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Republic, 351. (In Russ.)
Schwab, K. (2016). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The fourth industrial revolution]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Eksmo, 208. (In Russ.)
Bloommaert, T. & van den Broek, S. (2019). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya i biznes. Kak konkurirovat I razvivatsya v epokhu singulyarnsti [Management in Singularity: From linear to exponential management]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 204. (In Russ.)
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Intellekt, prinosyashchiy uspekh [Successful Intelligence: How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life]. Trans. from English. Minsk: LLC «Potpourri», 368. (In Russ.)
Ivanov, V. (2019). Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya politika v usloviyakh novoy strategii [Science and technology policy in context of new development strategy for Russia]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 4(246), 3–7. DOI: 10.26310/2071–3010.2019.246.4.001 (In Russ.)
Shanahan, M. (2015). The Technological Singularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, 272.
Gibson, R. (2015). The Four Lenses of Innovation: A Power Tool for Creative Thinking. Wiley, 304.
Ivanov, V. V., Malinetskiy, G. G. & Sirenko, S. N. (Eds.). (2018). Kontury tsifrovoy realnosti: gumanitarno-tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya i vybor budushchego [The contours of digital reality: Humanitarian-technological revolution and the choice of the future]. Moscow: LENAND, 344. (In Russ.)
Piketti T. (2016). Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the twenty-first century]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Marginem Press. 592. (In Russ.)
Idrisov, G. I., Knyaginin, V. N., Kudrin, A. L. & Rozhkova, E. S. (2018). Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya: Vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya ekonomiki [New technological revolution: challenges and opportunities for Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 4, 5–25. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Olga Aleksandrovna Romanova, Alena Olegovna Ponomareva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
