Improving the Assessment of the Tourism Potential of the Russian Arctic

Authors

  • Vladimir N. Myakshin Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
  • Alexander E. Shaparov Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
  • Daria V. Tikhanova Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-18

Keywords:

Arctic tourism, tourist destinations, tourism potential, balanced assessment, territories of the Russian Arctic, balanced scorecard, key indicators, target values of indicators, tourism infrastructure, tourism cluster

Abstract

The development of the domestic tourism market, including the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, is important for overcoming the consequences of the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. A comprehensive and reliable methodology for assessing the tourism potential is necessary for effective decision making and attracting tourists. Based on the analysis of international and Russian experience of assessing tourist destinations, we identified the shortcomings of the existing methods and substantiated the necessity of a nuanced approach to assessing the tourism potential of regions using authors’ balanced scorecard. Our methodology relies on the balanced approach, demonstrating the compliance of the assessment results with the interests of tourism stakeholders. The developed method considers information needs and main interests of tourists, business representatives, regional population and authorities. Based on key parameters of the tourism potential of the Arctic zone, we defined the structure of the balanced scorecard (economic, infrastructural and cultural-natural aspects) using systems and structural-functional analysis. Further, using the multivariate mean (with target values of indicators as a standardised coefficient), we calculated integral indicators, eliminating the influence of dynamics of other regions on the assessment results. Structural and comparative analysis of a matrix of integral indicators allowed us to examine the dynamics of the tourism potential of the Russian Arctic and ways to improve it (on the example of Arkhangelsk oblast). Correlation analysis of the relations between the tourism potential and tourist flows within a time lag confirms the reliability of the developed methodology. Research results can be used by authorities managing the Russian Arctic for identifying the ways to increase its tourism potential.

Author Biographies

Vladimir N. Myakshin, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Law and Jurisprudence

Alexander E. Shaparov, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov

Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Regional Studies, International Relations and Political Science, Higher School ofSocial Sciences, Humanities and International Communication

Daria V. Tikhanova, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov

PhD student, Department of Financial Law and Jurisprudence, Higher School of Economics, Management and Law

References

Stonehouse, B. & Snyder, J. M. (2010). Polar tourism: an environmental perspective. Bristol: Channel View Publications, 217.

Grenier, А. А. & Muller, D. K. (2011). Polar tourism: a tool for regional development. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 270 p.

Lee, Y.-S., Weaver, D. & Prebensen, N. (2017). N. Arctic tourism experiences: production, consumption and sustainability. Wallingford, Boston, MA: CABI, 216 p.

Maher, P. T., Stewart, E. J. & Lück, M. (2011). Polar tourism: human, environmental and governance dimensions. Elmsford, USA: Cognizant Communication Corporation, 299 p.

Stewart, E. J., Liggett, D. & Dawson, J. (2017). The evolution of polar tourism scholarship: research themes, networks and agendas. Polar Geography, 40(1), 59–84. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2016.1274789.

Amundsen, H. (2012). Differing Discourses of Development in the Arctic: The Case of Nature-Based Tourism in Northern Norway. Northern Review, 35, 125–146.

Bystrowska, M. & Dawson, J. (2017). Making places: the role of Arctic cruise operators in “creating” tourism destinations. Polar Geography, 40(3), 208–226. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2017.1328465.

Korostelev, E. M. & Biletsky, A. V. (2014). Eco-geographical approach to the organization of regulated tourism in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Rossiyskiy zhurnal ustoychivogo turizma [Russian Journal Sustainable Tourism], 4, 12–16. (In Russ.)

Loktev, R. I. (2015). Tourism in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation: problems and development prospects. Nauchnyy vestnik YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Scientific Bulletin of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous district], 3(88), 48–56. (In Russ.)

Orlova, V. S. (2017). The Arctic tourism is the innovative impulse of the European North development. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii [ Intellect. Innovation. Investments], 4, 40–43. (In Russ.)

Sevastyanov, D. V. (2017). Arctic tourism and recreational nature management — a new vector of northern territories development. Rossiya v globalnom mire, 10(33), 75–88. (In Russ.)

Lukin, Yu. F. (Ed.). (2016). Arkticheskiy turizm v Rossii [Arctic tourism in Russia North]. Arhangelsk: SAFU, 256. (In Russ.)

Ilkevich, S. & Strömberg, P. (2017). Chapter 18: Arctic Tourism in Russia: Attractions, Experiences, Challenges and Potentials. In: Arctic tourism experiences: production, consumption and sustainability (pp. 169–180). Wallingford, Boston, MA: CABI. DOI: 10.1079/9781780648620.0169.

Heldt Cassel, S. & Pashkevich, A. (2018). Tourism development in the Russian Arctic: Reproducing or challenging the hegemonic masculinities of the frontier. Tourism, Culture & Communication, 18(1), 67–80. DOI: 10.3727/109830418X15180180585176.

Pashkevich, A. & Stjernström, O. (2014). Making Russian Arctic accessible for tourists: analysis of the institutional barriers. Polar Geography, 37(2), 137–156. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2014.919040.

Velichkina, A. V. (2014). The assessment of the regional tourism infrastructure development. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: Fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast], 2(32), 239–250. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2014.2.32.18 (In Russ.)

Saarinen, J. & Varnajot, A. (2019). The Arctic in tourism: complementing and contesting perspectives on tourism in the Arctic. Polar Geography, 42, 109–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2019.1578287.

Blain, C., Levy, S. E. & Ritchie, J. R. B. (2005). Destination branding: Insights and practices from destination management organizations. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4), 328–338.

Manhas, P. S., Manrai, L. A. & Manrai, A. K. (2016). Role of tourist destination development in building its brand image: A conceptual model. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 21(40), 25–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jefas.2016.01.001.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

Danilenko, N. N. & Rubtsova, N. V. (2013). The content of concept “tourism cluster”. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional economics: theory and practice], 33(312), 45–53. (In Russ.)

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard — Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, 51–60.

Myakshin, V. & Petrov, V. (2019). Evaluating the investment attractiveness of a region based on the balanced scorecard approach. Regional Science Inquiry. Retrieved from: http://www.rsijournal.eu/?p=3403 (Date of access: 26.06.2019).

Leiper, N. (2004). Tourism management. Third edition. Frenchs Forest, NSW, Pearson Education Australia, 445.

Published

29.03.2021

How to Cite

Myakshin, V. N., Shaparov, A. E., & Tikhanova, D. V. (2021). Improving the Assessment of the Tourism Potential of the Russian Arctic. Economy of Regions, 17(1), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-18

Issue

Section

Research articles