Economic Effects of Public Investment Activity in Rural Municipalities of Eastern Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-21Keywords:
investments, rural municipalities, Eastern Poland, geographical location, natural environment, interregional proximity, EU funds, demographic changes, unemployment rate, entrepreneurshipAbstract
For several years, the development of regions of Eastern Poland has been supported with funds from the European Union (EU) special programme entitled «Eastern Poland». Its goal is to stimulate the economic and social development of this part of Poland, which is one of the least developed regions in the EU. These funds are aimed at reducing development disproportions between Eastern Poland and other regions. Therefore, the question about the effects of applying financial support from public funds of these regions is justified. Our research attempts not only to find an answer to this question, but also to fill the research gap explaining the role of some factors in the reduction of regional disparities in rural areas. The paper aims to identify the factors and effects of public investment activity in rural municipalities in Eastern Poland against all rural municipalities in the country. The research hypothesis assumes that there is a positive relation between the level of municipal investment activity and the share of the municipalities’ tax revenue in the overall budget revenue, and that the level of municipal investment activity depends on geographical location of rural areas. The research covered all rural municipalities in five regions of Eastern Poland, while data have been obtained from Central Statistical Office in Poland for the period 2004-2017. A percentage share of investment spending of rural municipalities in the overall budget expenditure was used as a measure of investment activity. The study used a comparative analysis method, descriptive statistics (mean, coefficient of variation), as well as one-factor analysis of variance and linear correlation. The research has shown that investment activity in rural municipalities in Eastern Poland during the analysed period was slightly lower than in the country as a whole, with remarkable differentiation among particular municipalities. There is no single factor defining the investment capacities of local authorities, however, relatively big differences in the receipt of EU funds by rural municipalities in Eastern Poland. The findings show that the proximity to highly developed regions did not energise the economic growth of rural municipalities in Eastern Poland to the same extent as the proximity to larger cities. The research results can be used by public sector institutions in rural development programmes, including measures to improve the effectiveness of the financial investments from public funds to increase the quality of life of rural inhabitants.References
Niedzielski, E. (2015). Functions of rural areas and their development. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej [Problems of Agricultural Economics], 2, 84-93. DOI: 10.5604/00441600.1152187 (In Polish)
Wilkin, J. (2007). Rural areas in conditions of dynamization of structural changes. In: Ekspertyzy do strategii Rozwoju Spoleczno-Gospodarczego Polski Wschodniej do roku 2020. T. 1 [Expertise for strategy of Socio-Economic Development of Eastern Poland until 2020. Vol. 1] (pp. 593-616). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego. (In Polish)
Boltromiuk, A. (2011). Mechanisms of internalisation of environmental externalities of agriculture. Roczniki Naukowe SERiA [Annals PAAAE], XIII(4), 23-28. DOI: 10.18276/sip.2015.42/2-08 (In Polish).
Heley, J. & Jones, L. (2012). Relational rural: Some thoughts on relating things and theory in rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 208-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.011.
Heffner, K. (2015). The spatial conditions required for the development of rural areas in Poland. Wies i Rolnictwo [Village and Agriculture], 2(167), 83-103. (In Polish).
Green-Leigh, N. & Blakely, E. J. (2017). Planning local economic development - theory and practice. SAGE Publications Inc., 513.
Cork 2.0 Deklaracja.,Lepsze zycie na obszarach wiejskich" [Cork 2.0 Declaration.,Better life in rural areas"]. (2016). Urzqd Publikacji Unii Europejskiej, 30. (In Polish)
Lazarescu, C., Boita, M. & Pribeanu, G. (2016). Sustainable rural development in the current context. Lucrari Stiintifice, seria I, 18, 131-136.
Michalek, J. & Zarnekow, N. (2012). Application of the Rural Development Index to Analysis of Rural Regions in Poland and Slovakia. Social Indicators Research, 105(1), 1-37. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9765-6.
Baumgartner, D., Schulz, T. & Seidl, I. (2013). Quantifying entrepreneurship and its impact on local economic performance: A spatial assessment in rural Switzerland. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 25(3-4), 222-250. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2012.710266.
Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F. & Sotte, F. (2017). Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the UE space, Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 78-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005.
Czudec, A., Majka, A. & Zajqc, D. (2018). Impact of European Union Cohesion Policy at Local Level (Rural Areas of South Eastern Poland case study). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(4), 785-803.
Romanowski, R. & Ciechomski, W. (2016). The impact of public expenses for innovativeness and entrepreneurship on local development in the Eastern Poland. Problemy Zarzqdzania [Management Issues], 14/3(2), 225-249. DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.62.13. (In Polish)
Meador, J. E. & Skerratt, S. (2017). On a unified theory of development: New institutional economics and the charismatic leader. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 144-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.007.
Czudec, A., Kata, R. & Mis, T. (2017). Efekty polityki rolnej Unii Europejskiej na poziomie regionalnym [The effects of the agricultural policy of the European Union at the regional level]. Poznan: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 251. (In Polish)
Czudec, A., Mis, T. & Zajqc, D. (2018b). Zrownowazony rozwoj obszarow wiejskich w wymiarze regionalnym [Sustainable development of rural areas in the regional dimension]. Poznan: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 145. (In Polish)
Jastrzqbska, M. (2016). The Conditions of Measuring Local Government Units Expenditure Efficiency. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia [Finance. Financial Market. Insurance], 6(84), 43-53. DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2016.84/1-04 (In Polish)
Poniatowicz, M. (2014). Determinants of investment activity by local governments in Poland under new EU financial perspective 2014-2020. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego, Ekonomiczne Problemy Uslug [Scientific Journals of the University of Szczecin, Economic Problems of Services], 115, 175-190. (In Polish)
Kozak, M. (2014). 10 years of cohesion policy in Poland. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne [Regional and Local Studies], 4(58), 25-49. (In Polish)
Parker, R. (2007). Networked governance or just networks? Local governance of the knowledge economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden). Political Studies, 55(1), 113-132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00624.x.
Bartz, K. & Fuchs-Schundeln, N. (2012). The role of borders, languages, and currencies as obstacles to labor market integration. European Economic Review, 56, 1148-1163. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.05.008.
Walther, O. & Reitel, B. (2013). Cross-border Policy Networks in the Basel Region: The Effect of National Borders and Brokerage Roles. Space and Polity, 17(2), 217-254. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2013.817515.
Cassi, L. & Plunket, A. (2014). Proximity, Network Formation and Inventive Performance: In Search of the Proximity Paradox. The Annals of Regional Science, 53(2), 395-422. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-014-0612-6.
Davids, M. & Frenken, K. (2018). Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process towards an integrated framework. Regional Studies, 52(1), 23-34. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349.
Jespersen, K., Rigamonti, D., Jensen, M. & Bysted, R. (2018). Analysis of SMEs partner proximity preferences for process innovation. Small Business Economics, 51(4), 879-904. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-017-9969-0.
Steiner, A. & Teasdale, S. (2019). Unlocking the potential of rural social enterprise. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 144-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.021.
Stimson, R. J. (2014). Proximity and endogenous regional development. In: A. Torre, F. Wallet (Eds.), Regional development and Proximity Relations (pp. 47-93). Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Katimertzopoulos, F. & Vlados, Ch. (2017). Local support mechanisms for entrepreneurship: The Approach of local development and innovation institutions. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10(1), 30-41. DOI: 10.25103/ijbesar.101.04.
Stanny, M. (2014). Zroznicowanie rozwoju obszarow wiejskich w Polsce [Differentiation of rural development in Poland]. Ossa: XV Kongres Gmin Wiejskich, 9. (In Polish)
McGranahan, D., Wojan, T. & Lambert, D. (2011). The rural growth trifecta: Outdoor amenities, creative class and entreneurial context. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(3), 529-557. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbq007.
Pender, J., Weber, G. W. & Brown, P. (2014). Sustainable Rural Development and Wealth Creation: Five Observations Based on Emerging Energy Opportunities. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(1), 73-86. DOI: 10.1177/0891242413513327.
Scott, M. (2013). Resilience: a Conceptual Lens for Rural Studies? Geography Compass, 7(9), 597-610. DOI: 10.1111/ gec3.12066.
Zajqc, D. (2014). Znaczenie pozarolniczej dzialalnosci gospodarczej rolnikow w procesie rozwoju wielofunkcyjnosci rolnictwa i obszarow wiejskich [The importance of non-farming business activities of farmers in the process of developing the multifunctional character of agriculture and rural areas]. Prace Naukowe Wydzialu Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, Seria: Monografie i Opracowania nr 17. Rzeszow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 385. (In Polish)
Spychalski, G. (2005). Mezoekonomiczne aspekty ksztaltowania rozwoju obszarow wiejskich [Mesoeconomic aspects of shaping the development of rural areas]. Warszawa: IRWiR PAN, 199. (In Polish)
Kasztelan, A. (2010). Environmental Competitiveness of Regions - Attempt of Conceptualization. Problemy Ekorozwoju [Problems of Sustainable Development], 5(2), 77-86. (In Polish)
Kutkowska, B. (Ed) (2010). Rozwoj zrownowazony rolnictwa i obszarow wiejskich na Dolnym Slqsku [Sustainable development of agriculture and rural areas on Lower Silesia]. Warszawa: IRWiR PAN, 287. (In Polish)
Czudec, A. (2011). Endogenous determinants of rural development (the example of Podkarpacie). In: W. Kaminska, K. Heffner (Eds.), Dychotomiczny rozwoj obszarow wiejskich? Czynniki progresji, czynniki peryferyzacji. Studia KPZK PAN, t. CXXXVIII [Dichotomous development of rural areas. Progression factors, peripherization factors. Studies KPZK PAS] (pp. 161-182). (In Polish)
Guzal-Dec, D., Siedlecka, A. & Zwolinska-Ligaj, M. (2015). Ekologiczne uwarunkowania i czynniki rozwoju funkcji gospodarczych na obszarach przyrodniczo cennych wojewodztwa lubelskiego [Ecological conditions and factors for the development of economic functions in the naturally valuable areas of the Lubelskie Voivodeship]. SERIA.,MONOGRAFIE I ROZPRAWY" nr 7. Biala Podlaska: Wydawnictwo PSW im. Papieza Jana Pawla II w Bialej Podlaskiej, 310. (In Polish)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Czudec, Dariusz Zajqc
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
