Quality Assessment of Online Learning in Regional Higher Education Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-15Keywords:
higher education, online learning, regional university, regional system, regionalisation of higher education, educational technology, education quality assessment, online learning students, gap analysis, SERVQUAL methodology, student satisfaction assessment, discrepancies between perceptions and expectationsAbstract
The quality of online learning mechanisms, widely implemented due to the COVID-19 pandemic, is a significant issue for regional higher education systems. The research aims to assess student satisfaction with the quality of online education by identifying discrepancies between their requirements and the actual learning process. In order to examine the gaps between students’ expectations and perceptions, a new approach was proposed based on the integrated use of Gap analysis and SERVQUAL methodology, combining qualitative and quantitative aspects. SERVQUAL questionnaires for measuring student satisfaction with online learning include the following criteria: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy. Full- and part-time undergraduates of humanitarian and socio-economic departments of two universities participated in the study. Ural Federal University bachelors, learning via Moodle and Microsoft Teams platforms, could directly communicate with their peers and professors, while students of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI were engaged in massive open online courses (MOOC). As a result, all five criteria were analysed in the proposed model for quality assessment of online learning to reveal the gaps between students’ expectations and perceptions of the educational process. Significant discrepancies in the «empathy» and «responsiveness» criteria in both groups demonstrate low student satisfaction with the quality of communication and individualisation of learning. The research findings can be used to construct resource allocation models for implementing educational programmes and developing support measures for regional higher education institutions.References
Denisov, I. V. & Kovalchuk, A. P. (2018). E-learning resources: implementation problems and their solution. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy internet-zhurnal [Russian Economics online-journal], 4(33). Retrieved from: https://readera.org/142220192 (Date of access: 23.02.2021). (In Russ.)
Ivanov, M. N. (2019). Digital transformation of the educational process. In: EdCrunch Tomsk. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii po novym obrazovatelnym tekhnologiyam [EdCrunch Tomsk: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Educational Technologies] (pp. 28–33). Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Dalsgaard, C. & Godsk, M. (2007). Transforming traditional lectures into problem‐based blended learning: challenges and experiences. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22(1), 29–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510601100143.
Frolov, S. Yu. (2015). Regional universities: problems of development in modernization of higher education. Vestnik CHelGU [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 9(364), 103–107. (In Russ.)
Abramyan, G. V. & Katasonova, G. R. (2020). Peculiarities of the organization of remote education in higher education institutions under conditions of self-insulation of citizens under the viral pandemia. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education], 3. Retrieved from: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29830 (Date of access: 22.02.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.29830. (In Russ.)
Shtykhno, D. A., Konstantinova, L. V. & Gagiev, N. N. (2020). Transition of Universities to Distance Mode during the Pandemic: Problems and Possible Risks. Otkrytoe obrazovanie [Open education], 5, 72–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818–4243–2020–5-72–81. (In Russ.)
Sergeev, A. G., Zhigalov, I. E. & Balandina, V. V. (2012). Vvedenie v elektronnoe obuchenie [Introduction to e-learning]. Vladimir: VlSU Publ., 182. (In Russ.)
Strizhenko, А. А. (2016). Online education: theory and practice. Ekonomika. Professiya. Bizness [Economics. Profession. Business], 1, 75–79. (In Russ.)
Dozhdikov, A. V. (2020). Online Learning as e-Learning: The Quality and Results (Critical Analysis). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 29(12), 21–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869–3617–2020–29–12–21–32. (In Russ.)
Fomina, А. S. (2016). Оnline learning in a higher school: methodology, content, technologies. Obshchestvo. Sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika [Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy], 1, 101–106. (In Russ.)
Grifoll, J. (2010). E-learning in the context of the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). In: J. Grifoll, E. Huertas, A. Prades, S. Rodríguez, Yu. Rubin, F. Mulder, E. Ossiannilsson, Quality Assurance of E-learning (pp. 7–10). Helsinki.
Malinin, N. V. (2014). E-learning quality models. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 3, 93–98. (In Russ.)
Krasnov, S. V., Kalmykova, S. V., Abushova, E. E. & Krasnov, A. S. (2018). Problems of Quality of Education in the Implementation of Online Courses in the Educational Process. In: 2018 International Conference on High Technology for Sustainable Development (HiTech). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HiTech.2018.8566618.
Peres, P., Lima, L., & Lima, V. (2014). B-learning Quality: Dimensions, Criteria and Pedagogical Approach. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 56–75. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014–0004.
Karasik, А. А. (2019). Quality assessment system of online courses in the project «Modern digital educational environment in the Russian Federation». In: EdCrunch Tomsk. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii po novym obrazovatelnym tekhnologiyam [EdCrunch Tomsk: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Educational Technologies] (pp. 205–209). Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Soboleva, E. Y. (2012). Expert projects for e-learning quality assessment. Prikladnaya informatika [Applied Informatics], 6(42), 15–23. (In Russ.)
Adelstein, D. & Barbour, M. K. (2017). Improving the K-12 Online Course Design Review Process: Experts Weigh in on iNACOL National Standards for Quality Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). DOI: http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2800.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/1251430.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/1251929.
Gritsova, О. А. & Tissen, Е. V. (2019). Approach to the assessment of the competitiveness of the master programs. In: Rossiyskie regiony v fokuse peremen. Sb. dokladov XIV mezhdunar. konf. 14–16 noyab. 2019 g. [XIV International Conference «Russian Regions in the Focus of Changes». November 14–16, 2019] (pp. 257–236). Ekaterinburg: UPI. (In Russ.)
Demtsura, S. S. (2017). Theoretic-methodological aspects of the problem of evaluation of customer satisfaction. Vestnik CHelGU [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 10(406), 7–14. (In Russ.)
Fedoskina, L. A. (2008). SERVQUAL methodology as a tool to increase innovation activity in service organizations. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative Economy], 3, 73–83. (In Russ.)
Nabokov, V. I., Mingalev, V. D., Pustuyev, A. L., Sharapova, V. M., Grytsova, O. A., Rubaeva, O. D. & Rasorvin, I. V. (2018). Marketing information analysis on educational service quality in terms of innovative activity. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 8(S-MRCHSPCL), 31–38. DOI: http://doi.org 10.7456/1080MSE/104.
Parasuraman, А. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Berry, L. L., Parasuraman, A. & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). The service-quality puzzle. Business Horizons, 31(5), 35–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007–6813(88)90053–5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Olga A. Gritsova, Elena V. Tissen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
