Energy Approach to Measure the Region's Assimilative Capacity

Authors

  • I.S. Belik Ural Federal University
  • Natalya Vladimirovna Starodubets Ural Federal University
  • Alena Igorevna Yachmeneva Ural Federal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-19

Keywords:

sustainable development, assimilative capacity, man's impact, energy approach, maximum permissible energy load, greenhouse gas emissions, absorbing capacity of the territory, fuel and energy balance, energy saving, energy strategy, regional planning

Abstract

One of the important problems of the environmental economics is the development of methodology for quantifying the assimilative capacity (AC) of a territory. The article analyzes the existing approaches to determining and assessing the AC of a territory. We justify the advantages of using the energy approach. We authors' method consists in using the maximum permissible energy load (MPEL) for quantitative assessment of the AC of a territory. MPEL is a value that the ecological and economic system can withstand for a long time without changing its properties. We determine MPEL on the basis of data on the ability of various categories of land to absorb greenhouse gases (GHG), as well as the specific GHG emissions per ton of conventional fuel. Further, we compare the calculated value of MPEL in fuel equivalents with the actual consumption of fuel resources for the needs of the national economy. These values ratio can serve as a standard for measuring and balancing the environmental and economic system. We authors have validated the described method on the example of the Sverdlovsk region, which is characterized by a high level of man's impact. Calculations show that the actual consumption of fossil fuels in the region exceeds MPEL. Wat indicates an imbalance in the ecological and economic system and may lead to further deterioration of the environmental quality in the region. We proposed methodological approach and calculations can be used when developing strategic planning documents for a territory, including its energy strategy.

Author Biographies

I.S. Belik, Ural Federal University

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Economic Security of Industrial Complexes, Ural Federal University (19, Mira St., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation; e-mail: irinabelik2010@mail.ru).

Natalya Vladimirovna Starodubets, Ural Federal University

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Ural Federal University (19, Mira St., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation; e-mail: n.v.starodubets@gmail.com).

Alena Igorevna Yachmeneva, Ural Federal University

PhD Student, Ural Federal University (21A, Syromolotova St., Ekaterinburg, 620072, Russian Federation; e-mail: alena.yachmenewa@yandex.ru).

References

Danilov-Danilyan, V. I. & Losev, K. S. (2000). Ekologicheskiy vyzov i ustoychivoye razvitie: ucheb. posobie [Environmental challenge and sustainable development: textbook]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 416. (In Russ.)

Pearce, D. W. & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 392.

Gilbert, A. & Janssen, R. (1998). Use of environmental functions to communicate the values of a mangrove ecosystem under different management regimes. Ecological Economics, 25(3), 323–346. DOI: 10.1016/S0921–8009(97)00064–5.

Lal, P. N. (1990). Conservation or Conversion of Mangroves in Fiji. Occasional Papers of the East-West Environment and Policy Institute № 11. Hawaii: East-West Center, 112.

Chichilnisky, G. & Heal, G. (1998). Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature, 391, 629–630.

Kreiger, D. J. (2011). Economic value of forest ecosystem services: A review. Washington, DC: The Wilderness Society, 40.

Peskin, H. M. & Delos Angeles, M. S. (2001). Accounting for environmental services: contrasting the SEEA and the ENRAP approaches. Review of Income and Wealth, 47(2), 2013–2019. DOI: 10.1111/1475–4991.00012.

Kokin, A. V. (2005). Assimilyatsionnyy potentsial biosfery [Population carrying capacity of the biosphere]. Rostov on Don: SKAGS Publ., 160. (In Russ.)

Golub, A. A. & Strukova, E. B. (2001). Ekonomika prirodnykh resursov: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov [Economy of natural resources: textbook for higher education institutions]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 319. (In Russ.)

Golub, A. A. & Strukova, E. B. (2005). Ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya [Environmental management economy]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 188. (In Russ.)

Gusev, A. A. (2003). Assimilyatsionnyy potentsial okruzhayushchey sredy v sisteme ekonomicheskikh otsenok i prav sobstvennosti na prirodnye resursy [Population carrying capacity of the environment in the system of economic estimates and the property rights to natural resources]. Ekonomicheskie problemy prirodopolzovaniya na rubezhe XXI veka [Economic problems of environmental management at a turn of the 21st century]. Moscow: TEIS Publ., 757. (236–455). (In Russ.)

Akimova, T. A., Khaskin, V. V., Sidorenko, S. N. & Zykov, V. N. (2005). Makroekologiya i osnovy ekorazvitiya: ucheb. posobie [Macroecology and ecodevelopment foundations: textbook]. Moscow: RUDN Publ., 367. (In Russ.)

Akimova, T. A. & Moseykin, Yu. N. (2009). Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya [Economy of sustainable development]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 430. (In Russ.)

Akimova, T. A. & Khaskin, V. V. (1994). Osnovy ekorazvitiya: ucheb. posobie [Ecodevelopment foundations: textbook]. Moscow: Rossiyskaya ekonomicheskaya akademiya Publ., 312. (In Russ.)

Lotosh, V. E. (2007). Ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya [Environmental economics]. Ekaterinburg: UrGUPS Publ., 449. (In Russ.)

WWF 2016. Living Planet Report 2016: Summary. WWF, Gland, Switzerland. 36.

Published

27.11.2017

How to Cite

Belik, I., Starodubets, N. V., & Yachmeneva, A. I. (2017). Energy Approach to Measure the Region’s Assimilative Capacity. Economy of Regions, 13(4), 1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-19

Issue

Section

Research articles