Regional Aspect of the Russian Insurance Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-4-17Keywords:
insurance markets, indicators, insurance security, requirements for the financial condition of insurance companies, insurance supervision, regulationAbstract
Regional disproportions of the Russian insurance market have a considerable impact on insurance coverage of regional needs. The development of insurance relationship results from high-quality and structural changes in insurance interests both in corporate and in retail insurance, in voluntary and mandatory forms. Regional conditions define the quality and dynamics of insurance offer. At the same time, organizational, legal, financial requirements to insurance companies do not consider their specificity. Therefore, regional organizations are driven out from the market. Moreover, an insurer, especially in personal insurance and property and casualty insurance, remains with representative offices of the federal companies offering the uniform customs and not assuming individual approach. The results of the study have proved that during the development of Russian insurance based on market principles, territorial disproportions had a significant impact on the satisfaction of insurance interests. Currently, the situation has been aggravated due to increased insurance supervision, increased requirements for the authorized capital of insurance organizations, asset quality, significant additional costs for the transition to a new chart of accounts, XBRL data formats at the request of the Central Bank of Russia, the development of insolvency, temporary administration, bankruptcy. Additional diversion of resources to counter «insurance lawyers», the settlement of problems with the Federal Anti-Monopoly Service (FAS) significantly affects the financial condition of insurance organizations, which are not in the list of the top 50 insurers. However, the access to the insurance services is not equal. Thus, in any region and locality in the country, consumers can not obtain insurance products of the required quality, even in the case of MPTL insurance for car owners. The conditions are unequal even for the settlement of claims in the area of insurance risks. We have considered the characteristics of the regional development of the insurance market and proposed additional criteria for their evaluation. We have identified the main problems of regional development, proposed a number of organizational and regulatory innovations to optimize the structure of the market. On the basis of the system comparative analysis of the regional insurance markets of Russia, we have concluded that there is a need for different approaches to determining the directions and key indicators for the development of regional insurance markets. The state of regional insurance is compared with the specificity of the regional economy, which is the basis for the development of insurance. We propose different requirements for the federal and regional insurance organizations. We have suggested new approaches to the regulation of regional insurance companies, which will allow to equalize supply and to improve the quality of insurance services in regional insurance markets.References
Kirillova, N. V. (2013). Regionalnyye aspekty razvitiya rossiyskogo strakhovogo rynka [Regional Aspects of the Russian InsuranceMarketDevelopment]. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo [Economics. Taxes. Law], 6, 81–86. (In Russ.)
Kirillova, N. V. (2013). Finansovaya ustoychivost konkurentnogo strakhovogo rynka. Kompleksy pokazateley, otrazhayushchikh finansovuyu ustoychivost konkurentnogo strakhovogo rynka [Financial sustainability of the competitive insurance market. Sets of indicators, reflecting the financial stability of a competitive insurance market]. Strakhovoye delo [Insurance business], 12, 3–10. (In Russ.)
Kuklin, A. A., Chichkanov, V. P., Chistova, E. V., Pecherkina, M. S., Nikulina, N. L., Pykhov, P. A., Kashina, T. O., Vasilyeva, A. V., Naslunga, K. S., Bykov, D. S., Shipitsyna, S. E., Krivenko, N. V. (2017). Kompleksnaya metodika diagnostiki blagosostoyaniya lichnosti i territorii prozhivaniya [Comprehensive methodology for diagnosing the welfare of an individual and a territory of residence]. In: A. A. Kuklin & V. P. Chichkanov (Eds). 2nd revised and enlarged ed.Ekaterinburg : Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN Publ., 162. DOI: 10.17059/583–0. (In Russ.)
Kuklin, A. A., Pecherkina, M. S., Tyrsin, A. N. & Surina, A. A. (2017). Metodicheskiy instrumentariy diagnostiki riskov blagosostoyaniya lichnosti i territorii prozhivaniya [Methodological Tools for the Detection of Risks to the Welfare of the Individuals and the Territory of Residence]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 13(4), 1030–1043. doi 10.17059/2017–4–55. (In Russ.)
Kuklin, A. A., Shipitsyna, S. E. & Naslunga, K. S. (2016). Sopostavlenie effektivnosti byudzhetnogo finansirovaniya i sotsialnoy bezopasnosti regiona [Comparison of the Efficiency of Budget Financing and the Social Security of a Region]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 12(3), 638–653. doi 10.17059/2016–3–3. (In Russ.)
Tsyganov, A. A. (2017). Razvitie strakhovogo rynka kak funktsiya razvitiya natsionalnoy ekonomiki [The development of insurance market as a function of the nation economics development]. Strakhovanie i upravlenie riskami. Problemy i perspektivy [Insurance and risk-management: problems and prospects]. Moscow, 140–152. (In Russ.)
Porfiryev, B. N. (2010). Ekonomicheskiy krizis. Problemy upravleniya i zadachi innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Economic crisis: management problems and tasks of innovative development]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 5, 20–26. (In Russ.)
Tatarkin, A. I., Krivenko, N. V. & Kuznetsova, N. L. (2015). Dialektika ratsionalnogo upravleniya izmeneniyami v regionalnykh sotsialnykh sistemakh [Dialectics of Rational Change Management in Regional Social Systems]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2, 125–136. DOI: 10.17059/2015–2–10. (In Russ.)
Bryan, S. G. & Pruitt, T. K. S. (2015). Systemic risk and the macroeconomy: an empirical evaluation. NBER working paper 20963, 64. Retrieved from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w20963.pdf. (date of accesse: 04.01.2018).
Chavas, J-P. (2004). Risk Analysis in Theory and Practice. Academic Press, 247. Retrieved from: http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/research/papers/portfolio_text.pdf (date of access: 04.01.2018).
Crocker, K. J. & Snow, A. Teory of Risk Classication. Retrieved from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/ist/handbookchapter.pdf (date of access: 04.01.2018).
Risk Classification and Health Insurance. CIRRELT-2011–67, 55. Retrieved from: https://www.cirrelt.ca/DocumentsTravail/CIRRELT-2011–67.pdf (date of access: 04.01.2018).
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: HarperCollins, 164.
Mill, J. S. (1909). Principles of political economy with some applications to social philosophy. Library of liberty. In: William James Ashley (Ed.).; 7th ed. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 808. Retrieved from: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/101 (date of access: 24.10.2018).
Porrini, D. (2015). Risk Classification Eciency and the Insurance Market Regulation. Risks, 3, 445–454.
Just, R. E. & Just, D. R. (2011). Global identification of risk preferences with revealed preference data. Journal of Econometrics, 162(1), 6–17.
Kirillova, N. V. (2001). Finansovaya ustoychivost i nesostoyatelnost strakhovykh kompaniy [The Financial Stability of the competitive insurance market]. Strakhovoe delo [Insurance business], 5, 17–21. (In Russ.)
Gryzenkova, Yu. V. (2014). Problemy organizatsii strakhovaniya na sluchay prirodnykh i tekhnogennykh katastrof v Rossii [Problems of insurance of natural and man-made disasters in Russia]. Ekonomika i politika [Economics and Politics], 2(3), 43–45. (In Russ.)
Shipitsyna, S. E. (2009). Otsenka strakhovogo potentsiala regiona [Estimation of insurance potential of region]. Ekonomika regiona [Ekonomika regiona], 2, 91–99. (In Russ.)
Nikulina, N. L. & Sinenko, A. I. (2013). Diagnostika finansovoy bezopasno-sti regiona [Diagnosing the Financial Security of a Region]. Upravlenets [The Manager], 4(44), 54–59. (In Russ.)
Orlov, A. I. & Pugach, O. V. (2012). Podkhody k obshchey teorii riska [Approaches to the general theory of risk]. Upravlenie bolshimi sistemami [Large-Scale Systems Control], 40, 49–82. (In Russ.)
Rezakhani, P. (2012). Classifying key risk factors in construction projects. Buletinul institutului politehnic din IAŞI, LVIII (LXII), 2, 22–38.
Tyrsin, A. N. (2015). O modelirovanii riska v sistemakh kritichnykh infrastruktur [On the modeling of risk in the systems of critical infrastructures]. Ekonomicheskie i tekhnicheskie aspekty bezopasnosti stroitelnykh kritichnykh infrastruktur. Tezisy mezhdunar. konf. 10–11 iyunya 2015 g. [Economic and technical aspects of the safety of critical infrastructures. Theses of International Conference. June 10–11, 2015]. Ekaterinburg: UrFU Publ., 205–208. Retrieved from: http://elar.urfu.ru/ bitstream/10995/33468/1/safety_2015.pdf (date of access: 27.01.2018). (In Russ.)
Tyrsin, A. N., Surina, A. A. & Stepanov, A. N. (2016). O modelirovanii riska v ekonomicheskikh sistemakh [On the modeling of risk in economic systems]. Sovremennyye tendentsii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologiy [Current trends in the development of science and technology], 10–1, 117–126. (In Russ.)
Rossel, E. E., Vorobyov, A. P., Kovaleva, G. A., Bespamyatnykh, N. N., Dukhova, N. I., Stepanova, M. V., Tatarkin, A. I., Kuklin, A. A., Romanova, O. A., Kalina, A. V., Chenenova, R. I., Myzin, A. L., Bogatyrev, L. L., Bochegov, A. V., Popov, D. V. & Osintsev, D. A. (2003). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost Sverdlovskoy oblasti [Economic security of the Sverdlovsk region]. In: Kovaleva, G. A. & A. A. Kuklin (Eds). Ekaterinburg: Ural Un-t Publ., 455. doi 10.17059/2017–4–5. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Aleksander Andreevich Tsyganov, Nadezda Victorovna Kirillova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
