The Project Approach for Managing the Environmentally Oriented Development of the Regional Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-14Keywords:
project, classification, project approach, region, environmental management, environmental protection, efficiency, ecological economy, ecologically oriented development, project-oriented managementAbstract
In the article, we develop the project management methodology in the field of the environmental management and protection. The study's relevance is due to the need to develop the principles and mechanisms of project management. They are necessary for implementing the economy's environmentally oriented development, using the natural resources rationally, reducing the environmental burden and improving the quality of the population's life. We aimed to substantiate the implementation of new management technologies by combining the principles of the project and ecological approaches, providing the flexibility of resource management. We suggested the differentiated approach in the project management in accordance with the strategic goals and achievement of the established indicators of the territory development. This approach ensures the project's competitiveness, the possibility of its territorial geo-referencing, the efficiency of the project's implementation. Further, we developed theoretical approaches and practical recommendations for implementing the project approach for managing the region's environmentally oriented development. We incorporated the results of modern studies in developing the project management methodology in the regional economy. Moreover, we considered the preconditions of transitioning to project-oriented management in the sphere of the environmental management and protection. We identified characteristics of the ecologically oriented projects. Then we proposed their classification using the project's functional purpose, the results' purpose and direction, the project's sources of financing and its implementation level as the classification criteria. We analysed the practical experience of implementing the environmental projects in the Russian Federation and in certain regions of the country. Finally, we demonstrated the advantages of the project approach in comparison with the program-target management of economic development. The study's main provisions can be used as a theoretical, methodological and practical basis for substantiating, selecting and implementing the projects of environmental and economic orientation. They include the projects of production's ecological modernization, reduction of negative environmental impact, elimination of accumulated ecological damage, management of climate changes, Arctic's development, and development of the market of ecological goods and services.References
Charkina, E. S. (2017). Razvitie proektnogo podkhoda v sisteme gosurstvennogo upravleniya [Development of project approach in the system of public administration: methodology, experience, problems]. Moscow: IE RAS, 54. (In Russ.)
Tatarkin, A. I. (2012). Prostranstvennoe razvitie regionalnykh i territorialnykh ekonomicheskikh sistem s ispolzovaniem programmno-proektnykh podkhodov [Market institutions of spatial development of regional and territorial economic systems]. Problemy ekonomiki [The problems of economy], 3, 71–80. (In Russ.)
Kadyshev, E. N. & Petrova, I. V. (2014). Sotsialno orientirovannoe munitsipalnoe upravlenie na osnove proektnogo podkhoda [Socially-oriented municipal management based on a project approach]. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional economy: theory and practice], 35, 48–55. (In Russ.)
Smirnov, M. A. (2016). Ispolzovanie proektnogo podkhoda pri realizatsii gosudarstvennykh programm [The Project Approach Application in the Government Program Implementation]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 1, 79–88. (In Russ.)
Kirilchuk, S. P. & Shevchenko, E. V. (2018). Kompleksnyy analiz gotovnosti turistsko-rekreatsionnykh predpriyatiy k proektnomu podkhodu [Comprehensive analysis of willingness of tourist-and-recreational businesses in the project approach]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo ekonomicheskogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Izvestiya VSTU], 1, 9–15. (In Russ.)
Ragimov, F. I. (2010). Osobennosti i printsipy upravleniya innovatsionno-investitsionnoy deyatelnostyu predpriyatiy oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa [The Features and principles of management of urban investment programs on the basis of project approach]. Finansovaya zhizn [Financial life], 1, 17–21. (In Russ.)
Kandybko, N. V. (2013). Proektnyy podkhod k upravleniyu innovatsionno-investitsionnoy deyatelnostyu predpriyatiy oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa [Project Methods in Management of Defense-Industrial Complex Innovation and Investment Activity]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta im. S. Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika I upravleniya [Moscow Witte University Bulletin. Series 1: Economics and management], 2, 52–58. (In Russ.)
Yurieva, T. V. (2013). Krizisnyy menedzhment i proektnyy podkhod [Crisis management and project approach]. Effektivnoe antikrizisnoe upravlenie [Effective crisis management], 5, 74–79. (In Russ.)
Sergeev, N. N. (2011). Proektnyy podkhod v realizatsii politiki energosberezheniya na promyshlennom predpriyatii [Planning approach to realization of energy-saving policy in industrial enterprise]. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Vestnik of Astrakhan state technical University. Series: Economics], 1, 72–75. (In Russ.)
Stoikov, V. & Gassiy V. (2018) Energy efficiency of housing as a tool for sustainable development. VI International Scientific Conference “Integration, Partnership and Innovation in Construction Science and Education” (IPICSE–2018). MATEC Web of Conferences 251, 03061 (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2018/110/matecconf_ipicse2018_03061.pdf (Date of access: 17.01.2019).
Bozhko, L. M. (2014). Primenenie proektnogo podkhoda v upravlenii organizatsionnymi izmeneniyami: ogranicheniya i perspektivy [The application of project approach at organizational change management: the restrictions and the prospects]. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i Yuridicheskie nauki [News of the Tula state University. Economic and legal Sciences], 1–1, 08–113. (In Russ.)
Egorov, E. E., Anisenko, A. V., Burlakova, Y. V. & Bykova, N. S. (2016). Proektnaya deyatelnost kak innovatsionnaya tekhnologiya v sisteme sovremennykh podkhodov k obucheniyu [Project activities as an innovative technology in modern approaches to teaching system]. Mir nauki [World of science], 4(4), 12. (In Russ.)
Fidarova, M. G. (2014). Model organizatsii proektnoy deyatelnosti studentov pri kompetentnostnom podkhode [Students’ project activity organization model with competence approach]. Diskussiya [Discussion], 6, 104–112. (In Russ.)
Bobylev, S. N., Goryachev, A. A. & Nemov, V. I. (2017). “Zelenaya” ekonomika: Proektnyy podkhod [Project management in green economy]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: Elektronnyy vestnik [Public administration. E-Journal], 64, 34–44. (In Russ.)
Leksin, V. N. & Porfiryev, B. N. (2015). Problemy i perspektivy ispolzovaniya proektnogo podkhoda v upravlenii rzvitiem rossiyskoy Arktiki [Issues and perspectives of using project-oriented approach in the Russian Arctic development management policy]. MIR. Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie [MIR. Modernization. Innovations. Research], 6(4–1), 10–18. (In Russ.)
Potravny, I. M. & Motorina, M. A. (2017). Razvitie opornykh zon v Rossiyskoy Arktike na osnove proektnogo podkhoda [The development of reference areas in the Russian Arctic on the basis of the design approach]. Gorizonty ekonomiki [The Horizons of the Economy], 6, 31–36. (In Russ.)
Dibo, A. P. A., Noble, B. F. & Sánchez, L .E. (2018). Perspectives on Driving Changes in Project-based Cumulative Effects Assessment for Biodiversity: Lessons from the Canadian Experience. Environmental Management, 62(5), 929–941.
Dino, G. A., Danielsen, S. W. & Chiappino, C. (2017). Recycling of rock materials as part of sustainable aggregate production in Norway and Italy. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 50(4), 412–416.
Fast, S. (2017) Assessing public participation tools during wind energy siting. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7(3), 386–393.
Gordon, B. L., Quesnel, K. J., Abs, R. & Ajami, N. K. (2018). A case-study based framework for assessing the multi-sector performance of green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 223, 371–384.
Josephs, L. I. & Humphries, A. T. (2018). Identifying social factors that undermine support for nature-based coastal management. Journal of Environmental Management, 212, 32–38.
Liu, H., Ou, X., Yuan, J. & Yan, X. (2018). Experience of producing natural gas from corn straw in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 216–224.
Tantanee, S., Wandee, K. & Tovichakchaikul, S. (2018). One page project management application on flood preparedness: Case study of Thailand. Procedia Engineering, 212, 363–370.
Tulyakova, I. V. (2017). Otsenka effektivnosti gosudarstvennykh program: problem i perspektivy [Assessment of the effectiveness of state programs: problems and prospects]. Finkontrol [Fincontrol], 4. Retrieved from: http://rufincontrol.ru/article/332551/ (In Russ.)
Dobrolyubova, E. I. (2017). Metodicheskie problemy otsenki effektivnosti gosudarstvennykh programm [Methodological issues of evaluating effectiveness of state programs]. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii [Regional economy. South of Russia], 1, 95–105. (In Russ.)
Breusova, A. G. (2015). Otsenka effektivnosti gosudarstvennykh program [Evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Herald of Omsk University. Series “Economics”], 2, 128–136. (In Russ.)
Yashalova, N. N. & Ruban, D. A. (2016). Spetsifika analiza prirodookhrannykh investitsiy v ramkakh problem ekologizatsii natsionalnoy ekonomiki [Nature protection investment as part of greening of national economy]. Finansovaya analitika: Problemy i resheniya [Financial Analytics: science and experience], 9(35), 2–12. (In Russ.)
Alikhadzhiyeva, D. S., Murtazova, H. M.-S. & Barsaiva, M. A. (2015). Ekologicxheskiy ausit territorii pri obosnovanii investitsionnykh proektov po razvitiyu alternativnykh istochnikov energii v upravlenii prirodopolzovaniem [Environmental audit of the territory in the justification of investment projects on development of alternative energy sources]. Ekonomika prirodopolzovaniya [Environmental Economics], 1, 98–107. (In Russ.)
Alikhadzhieva, D. S. (2017). Ekonomicheskoe obosnovanie proekta po proizvodstvu ekologichnykh stroitelnykh materialov za schet vnebyudzhetnykh istochnikov finansirovaniya [Economic justification of the project of the production of environmentally friendly building materials with extrabudgetary funding sources]. Gorizonty ekonomiki [The Horizons of the Economy], 4(37), 97–102. (In Russ.)
Gassiy, V. & Potravny, I. (2017). The assessment of the socio-economic damage of the indigenous peoples due to industrial development of Russian Arctic. Czech Polar Reports, 7(2), 257–270. DOI: 10.5817/CPR2017–2-25.
Loginov, V. G., Ignatyeva, M. N. & Balashenko, V. V. (2018). Etnosotsioekosistemnyy podkhod k otsenke zhiznedeyatelnosti korennykh malochislennykh narodov [Ethnic Social and Ecosystem Approach to the Evaluation of the Lifehoods of Small Indigenous Peoples of the North]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 14(3), 896–913. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Ivan Mikhailovich Potravny, Natalya Nikolaevna Yashalova, V.V. Gassiy, Ferreyra K. Y. Chavez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
