Influence of Anthropogenic Factors of the Industrial Production on the Quality of Life of the Population in the Region

Authors

  • Irina Stepanovna Belik Ural Federal University
  • Lyudmila Vladimirovna Kamdina Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Natalia Vladimirovna Starodubets Ural Federal University; Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-2050

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-15

Keywords:

quality of life of the population, anthropogenic factors of the industrial production, environmental quality, greenhouse gas emissions, household incomes, household expenses, energy conservation, integral index of the quality of life of the population, regional strategy

Abstract

In the contemporary world, the anthropogenic effect is increasing. At the same time, the quality of life of the population is strongly associated with the environmental quality, as there is growing understanding that rising economic income does not ensure the humanity's well-being. In this regard, issues connected with analysing the influence of the anthropogenic factor on changes in the quality of the life of the population become relevant. We believe that existing approaches to assessing the quality of life poorly reflect the current situation related to the speed of the environmental changes due to an increase in the scale and intensity of its pollution. Therefore, for assessing the quality of life, we suggest taking into account the environmental and energy components ofthe anthropogenic factor. To this end, the classification of anthropogenic factors is supplemented by the “industrial production” group, distinguished by the “source of impact” indicator, which allows analysing the groups influence on changing parameters ofthe quality of life ofthe population. The methodological basis ofthe study is a comprehensive approach to assessing the quality of life. Based on it, we structured the stages of the evolution of approaches to measuring and assessing the quality of life ofthe population. Moreover, we described key features of these approaches, and identified the fourth stage that substantiates the priority of environmental and energy criteria in assessing the quality of life. We propose to improve the methodology for assessing the quality of life of the population by introducing additional environmental and energy characteristics. The article presents the results of using this improved methodology. We tested it on the examples ofthe Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk regions. The obtained values of the integral indicators of the quality of life of the population show that the Sverdlovsk region has lower index values. That happened due to a more developed industrial sector and, as a result, the more deteriorated environmental situation. The proposed methodology for assessing the quality of life ofthe population can be used by regional leaders for making decisions related to the regional development aimed at improving the quality of life of the population.

Author Biographies

Irina Stepanovna Belik, Ural Federal University

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Ural Federal University (19, Mira St., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation; irinabelik2010@mail.ru).

Lyudmila Vladimirovna Kamdina, Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics and Finance, Ural Branch of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (58, Rabotnits St., Chelyabinsk, 454084, Russian Federation; e-mail: kamdina_prof@mail.ru).

Natalia Vladimirovna Starodubets, Ural Federal University; Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

PhD in Economics, Assistant Professor, Ural Federal University; Senior Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-2050 (19, Mira St., Ekaterinburg, 620002; 29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: n.v.starodubets@gmail.com).

References

Kuznetsov, S. V., Rastova, Yu. I. & Rastov, M. A. (2017). Reyting kak mera otsenki kachestva zhizni v rossiyskikh regionakh [Rating Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Russian Regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 13(1), 137–146. (In Russ.)

Belik, I. S. & Kamdina, L.V. (2018). Vzaimosvyaz antropogennogo vozdeystviya i kachestva zhizni naseleniya v Sverdlovskoy i Chelyabinskoy oblastyakh [Analysis of the Relationship between Human Impact and Quality of Population Life (on the Example of Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk Regions)]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 7(417), 39–48. (In Russ.)

Ignatov, V. G. & Kokin, A. V. (2002). Puti obespecheniya regionalnoy ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti v sbalansirovannom prirodopolzovanii [Ways to ensure the region’s environmental safety in a balanced nature management]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipalnoe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS [State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes], 2, 17–27. (In Russ.)

Triebskorn, R., Adam, S., Behrens, A., Beier, S., Böhmer, J., Braunbeck, T., … Traunspurger, W. (2003). Establishing Causality between Pollution and Effects at Different Levels of Biological Organization: The VALIMAR Project. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 9(1), 171–194. DOI: 10.1080/713609858.

Siesfeld, T., Cefola, J. & Neef, D. (1998). The Economic Impact of Knowledge. USA: Routledge, 398.

Filyukov, I. A. (2009). Genezis nauchnykh idey o kachestve zhizni naseleniya: otechestvennye i zarubezhnye podkhody [Genesis of scientific ideas concerning living standards: domestic and foreign approaches]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obshchestvennyye nauki [University proceedings. Volga region. Social sciences], 3, 50–59. (In Russ.)

Talalushkina, Yu. N. (2015). Istoriko-ekonomicheskie aspekty formirovaniya ponyatiya «kachestvo zhizni [Historical and economic aspects of the formation of the concept “quality of life”]. Istoriya i sovremennost [History and Modernity], 2(22), 59–68. (In Russ.)

Avraamova, E., Grishina, E., Maleva, T. & Polyakova, A. (2017). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie naseleniya: analiz tekushchikh trendov (po rezultatam regulyarnogo monitoringa INSAP RANKHIGS) [Social and Economic Position of the Population: Analysis of the Current Trends]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitiye Rossii [Russian Economic Developments], 2, 46–57. (In Russ.)

Belik, I. S. & Kamdina, L. V. (2017). Vliyanie energeticheskogo faktora na kachestvo zhizni domokhozyaystv [Influence of the energy factor on the quality of household life]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences], 4, 18–22. (In Russ.)

Degtyarev, V. V. (2007). Some results of dredging effect studies of water quality and basins ecology. 17th Congress of IAHR, 6, 852–853.

Tatarkin, A. I. (2016). Regionalnaya napravlennost ekonomicheskoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak instituta prostranstvennogo obustroystva territoriy [Regional Targeting of the Economic Policy of the Russian Federation as an Institution of Regional Spatial Development]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 12(1), 9–27. DOI: 10.17059/2016–1–1 (In Russ.)

Environment and Human Health. Europe’s Environment: The Third Assessment. (2003). Copenhagen: EEA, 341.

Tropchenko, I. V. (Ed.). (2015). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i pravovye osnovy razvitiya ekonomiki: Kollektivnaya monografiya [Socio-economic and legal foundations of economic development]. Ufa: RIO MTSII OMEGA SAYNS, 208. (In Russ.)

Sadovaya, E. S. & Sautkina, V. A. (2012). Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya mira: izmerenie, tendentsii, instituty [Quality of life of the world population: measurement, trends and institutions]. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 208. (In Russ.)

Shulenina, N. V. (2003). Ekologicheskaya politika sovremennoy Rossii: ot imperativov k argumentam [The Environmental Policy of Contemporary Russia: from Demands to Arguments]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Politologiya [RUDN Journal of Political Science], 4, 43–54. (In Russ.)

Grishina, I. V., Polynev, A. O. & Timonin, S. A. (2012). Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii: metodologiya issledovaniya i rezultaty kompleksnoy otsenki [The quality of life of the population in the regions of Russia: a research meth- odology and the results of integrated assessment modelling]. Sovremennye proizvoditelnye sily [Modern Productive Forces], 1, 70–83. (In Russ.)

Golichenkov, A. K. (2001). Okhrana okruzhayushchey prirodnoy sredy, obespechenie ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti, obespechenie ratsionalnogo prirodopolzovaniya prirodnykh resursov: obshchee i osobennoe [Environmental protection, ensuring ecological security, ensuring the rational use of natural resources: general and special]. In: B. N. Alekseev, M. M. Brinchuk, N. M. Vasilchenko, … Yu. S. Tsaturov, Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost: problemy, poisk, resheniya [Ecological security: problems, search, solutions] (pp. 141–146). Moscow: Mak-tsentr. (In Russ.)

Arkhipova, M. Yu. (2013). Innovatsii i uroven zhizni naseleniya: issledovanie vzaimosvyazi i osnovnykh tendentsiy razvitiya [Innovations and living standards of population: analysis of interconnections and key development trends]. Voprosy statistiki, 4, 45–53. (In Russ.)

Wilson, R. & Spengler, J. (1996). Particles in Our Air: Concentrations and Health Effects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, 259.

Belik, I. S. & Kamdina, L. V. (2019). Vliyanie energeticheskikh i ekologicheskikh faktorov na kachestvo zhizni naseleniya [Influence of energy and environmental factors on the quality of life of the populatio]. In: Materialy 15-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii Rossiyskogo obshchestva ekologicheskoy ekonomiki “Strategiya i instrumenty ekologicheski ustoychivogo razvitiya ekonomiki” [Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference of the Russian Society of Ecological Economics (RSEE) “Strategies and Tools for Ecologically Sustainability Economic Development”] (pp. 248–254). Stavropol: «AGRUS». (In Russ.)

Zadesenets, E. E., Zarakovskiy, G. M. & Penova, I. V. (2010). Metodologiya izmereniya i otsenki kachestva zhizni naseleniya Rossii [Methodology of measuring and assessing the quality of life of Russian population]. Mir izmereniy [Measurements World], 2, 37–44. (In Russ.)

Anikiev, V. V. & Zakharova, P. V. (2002). Integralnyy kriteriy ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti [Integral criteria of ecological security]. Geoinformatika [Geoinformatics], 1, 8–16. (In Russ.)

Bobylev, S., Kudryavtseva, O. & Solovyeva, S. (2014). Indikatory ustoychivogo razvitiya dlya gorodov [Sustainable development indicators for cities]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 3, 101–110. (In Russ.)

Széll, G. & Széll, U. (2011). Quality of Life & Working Life in Comparison. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 24.

Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, S. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Yale University Press, 304.

Blyum, E. A. (2013). Obzor metodik otsenki investitsionnogo potentsiala regiona [Review of the methods for assess- ing the region’s investment potential]. Molodoy uchenyy [Young scientist], 7, 137–141. (In Russ.)

Published

27.12.2019

How to Cite

Belik, I. S., Kamdina, L. V., & Starodubets, N. V. (2019). Influence of Anthropogenic Factors of the Industrial Production on the Quality of Life of the Population in the Region. Economy of Regions, 15(4), 1156–1168. https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-15

Issue

Section

Research articles