Quality of Life in Portuguese Municipalities: A Multidimensional Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-3-16Keywords:
quality of life, well-being, territorial asymmetry, regional development, multivariate approach, cluster analysisAbstract
The estimation of the level of development of a territory is an issue that has had different approaches and methodologies. If the first attempts were associated with determining the income generated and retained by the territory, the most recent indicators of quality of life or well-being are based on a multidimensional concept, improved by adding other dimensions including several variables. On the other hand, despite the statistical difficulties, analysis of smaller geographic units is closer to reality, allowing researchers to draw relevant and effective final considerations. Focusing on the case of Portugal mainland, an old country with strong and persistent development asymmetries, this work sought to examine the similarities and differences in various dimensions of the concept of quality of life, in the positioning of the chosen territorial units, the municipalities. Then, after collecting recent annual variables at the municipality level, data were processed using multivariate analysis. The construction of clusters revealed affinities between the municipalities. The results obtained show the asymmetries of development and well-being in the national territory, and their disaggregation, both in terms of the multiple dimensions under analysis and in terms of the municipalities. The study offers a greater and deeper understanding of the regional reality and consequently can favour the efficiency of cohesion policies.
References
Amado, C. A. F., Barreira, A. P., Santos, S. P. & Guimarães, M. H. (2019). Comparing the quality of life of cities that gained and lost population: An assessment with DEA and the Malmquist index. Regional Science, 98(5), 2075-2097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12448
Calcagnini, G. & Perugini, F. (2019). Social capital and well-being in the Italian provinces. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.005
Carrasco-Campos, Á., Moreno, A. & Martínez, L. (2017). Quality of Life, Well-Being and Social Policies in European Countries. In: Quality of Life and Quality of Working Life. InTech Open. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/68003
Christodoulou, A., Blioumis, V., Stamatellos, G. & Menexes, G. (2008). Nature and quality of life: the case of Kolindros, prefecture of Pieria, Greece. An application of multidimensional data analysis methods. New Medit, 2, 57-63.
Dardha, E. & Rogge, N. (2020). How’s Life in Your Region? Measuring Regional Material Living Conditions, Quality of Life and Subjective Well-Being in OECD Countries Using a Robust, Conditional Benefit-of-the-Doubt Model. Social Indicators Research, 151(3), 1015-1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02411-x
Diniz, F. & Sequeira, T. (2008). A social and economic development index — NUTS ranking in Portugal. Interações, 9(1), 19-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-70122008000100003 (In Port.)
Dionísio, A. & Rego, C. (2020). Quality of Life — Urban versus Rural analysis based on fuzzy sets approach. In: V. Andersen (Ed.), An Introduction to Fuzzy Sets. Nova Science Publishers.
Ehrlich, J., Medcalfe, S. & Sanders, S. (2021). Composite Index Ranking of Economic Well-Being in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: How Prevalent are Rank Anomalies? Social Indicators Research, 157(2), 543-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02673-z
Goletsis, Y. & Chletsos, M. (2011). Measurement of development and regional disparities in Greek periphery: A multivariate approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(4), 174–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2011.06.002.
Gonzalez, E., Carcaba, A., Ventura, J. & Garcia, J. (2011). Measuring Quality of Life in Spanish Municipalities. Local Government Studies, 37(2), 171-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.554826
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall, 816.
Landeiro, G. M. B., Pedrozo, C. C. R., Gomes, M. J. & Oliveira, E. R. de A. (2011). Systematic review of studies on quality of life indexed on the SciELO database. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(10), 4257–4266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011001100031 (In Port.)
Maricic, M. (2019). Assessing the quality of life in the European Union: The European Index of Life Satisfaction (EILS). Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 35(2), 261–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-180481
Oliveira Martins, J. (2021). Regional policy narratives and the ‘geographies of discontent’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14, 625–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab024
Özgür, A. & Aylin, Ç. Ç (2011). Quality of Life in Ageing Societies: Italy, Portugal, and Turkey. Educational Gerontology, 37(11), 945–966. DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2010.492730
Pinto, H. & Guerreiro, J. (2010). Innovation regional planning and latent dimensions: the case of the Algarve region. Annals of Regional Science, 44(2), 315–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0264-5
Rego, C. & Baltazar, M. S. (2011). Interactions between the local and the global: the perspective of territorial development. In: M. S. Baltazar, C. Rego (Eds.), Globalização e Desenvolvimento [Globalization and Development] (pp. 11-36). Lisboa: Caleidoscópio. (In Port.)
Rego, C., Ramos, I. J., Lucas, M. R., Baltazar, M. S. & Dionísio, A. (2021). New geography in old territories: a multivariate approach based on Portuguese regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 25–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1860807
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Saha, S., Basu, S. & Pandit, D. (2020). Identifying Factors Influencing Perceived Quality of Life (QoL) of Indian Elderly: Case Study of Kolkata, India. Social Indicators Research, 160, 867–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02493-7
Shams, K. & Kadow, A. (2019). The Relationship Between Subjective Well-Being and Work–Life Balance Among Labourers in Pakistan. Journal of Family & Economic Issues, 40(4), 681–690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-019-09631-5
Shi, T., Zhu, W. & Fu, S. (2021). Quality of life in Chinese cities. China Economic Review, 69, 101682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101682
Silva Ferentz, L. M., Mello Garcias, C. & Ferreira Setim, L. C. (2020). Proposal for an indicator of sustainable development based on quality of life, welfare and happiness: a pilot study in Curitiba city, Brasil. Análise Social [Social Analysis], LV(1), 168-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31447/as00032573.2020234.07 (In Port.)
Soares, J. O., Marquês, M. M. L. & Monteiro, C. M. F. (2003). A multivariate methodology to uncover regional disparities: A contribution to improve European Union and governmental decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 121–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00146-7
Stiglitz, J. E., Fitoussi, J.-P. & Durand, M. (Eds.). (2018). Beyond GDP: Measuring what counts for economic and social performance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307292-en
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: Institutnational de la statistique et des études économiques, 292.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Дионисио Андреа , Рего Мария Консейсан , Секейра Тереза
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
