Public-Private Partnership as the Core Form of the Implementation of Russia’s Transport and Transit Potential

Authors

  • Valery Anatolyevich Tsvetkov Market Economy Institute of RAS
  • Kobilzhon Khodzhievich Zoidov Market Economy Institute of RAS
  • Alexey Anatolyevich Medkov Market Economy Institute of RAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-1

Keywords:

transport and transit potential, investment projects, public-private partnerships, international transport corridors, Euro-Asian routes, railway transport, shipping

Abstract

The article discusses the theory and practice of the implementation and development of transport and transit potential (TTP) of Russia. This could be an effective way to replace the natural resource rent as the main source of income for the state and economic actors. For the modernization of national economic system the key importance are innovative technologies in the development of transport and transit potential through the organization of the production of goods and services with the highest added value in Russia. We proposed and substantiated the hypothesis about the necessity of creation of a Federal company responsible for the financing and implementation of Russia’s transport and transit potential development projects on the principles of public-private partnership (PPP). The authors have revealed the economic, institutional and organizational prerequisites for the establishment of such a public-private partnership company. We have provided the opinions of scientists and experts showing the urgent need to create in one form or another a single operator to transport goods on the territory of Russia and the Eurasian economic Union. To prove the hypothesis, we presented a description and analysis of the factors affecting the value of transit freight transport on Euro-Asian routes. We paid the special attention to identify the reasons of the increasing competitive advantage of Maritime transport in the world’s goods movement system. The authors based the main conclusion that, first of all, the created public-private partnership company should be large due to tough competition of developing transit freight by land routes with the global Maritime container services. Secondly, it needs a significant state participation since the management of the worlds cargo flows requires the effort of foreign policy and geo-economic nature. We emphasized that this business entity would become an active proponent and lobbyist of the most effective projects for the development of transport infrastructure of the country. The research is based on the methods of system analysis, theory of structural and technological balance of economics, organization theory, evolution and institutional theory and utilizes historical approach. The results of the study can be used for the development of the state economic sectoral programmes of structural reforms; indicative plans of innovative development of rail, sea, road infrastructure and transport machine building; as well as for the preparation and implementation of specific projects of financing the development of transport and transit potential on a public-private partnership basis.

Author Biographies

Valery Anatolyevich Tsvetkov, Market Economy Institute of RAS

Corresponding Member of RAS, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Market Economy Institute of RAS (47, Nakhimovsky Ave., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; e-mail: tsvetkov@ipr-ras.ru).

Kobilzhon Khodzhievich Zoidov, Market Economy Institute of RAS

PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor, Head of Laboratory, Market Economy Institute of RAS (47, Nakhimovsky Ave., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; e-mail: kobiljonz@mail.ru).

Alexey Anatolyevich Medkov, Market Economy Institute of RAS

PhD in Economics, Leading Research Associate, Market Economy Institute of RAS (47, Nakhimovsky Ave., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; e-mail: medkov71@mail.ru).

References

Alpatov, A. A., Pushikn, A. V. & Dzhaparidze, R. M. (2010). GChP. Mekhanizmy realizatsii. In Russian [State-private partnership. Mechanisms of realization]. Moscow: Alpina Publ., 200.

Bazhenov, A. (2012). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoye partnerstvo — edinstvennyy mekhanizm razvitiya Dalnego Vostoka. In Russian [Public-private partnership is the only mechanism of development of the Far East]. Promyshlennik Rossii [Russian industrialist], 7–8(139), 35–37.

Varnavskiy, V. G., Klimenko, A. V. et al. (2010). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoye partnerstvo. Teoriya i praktika. In Russian [Public-private partnerships: theory and practice]. Moscow: GU-VShE Publ., 287.

Delmon, J. (2010). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoye partnerstvo v infrastrukture. Prakticheskoye rukovodstvo dlya organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti. In Russian [Public-private partnership in infrastructure. Practical cal guide for public authorities]. Astana: Apelsin Publ., 261.

Deryabina, M. (2008). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoye partnerstvo. Teoriya i praktika. In Russian [Public-private partnerships: theory and practice]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of economics], 8, 61–77.

Zeldner, A. G. (2011). Gosudarstvenno-chastnoye partnerstvo. Teoriya, metodologiya i praktika. In Russian [State-private partnership: theory, methodology and practice]. Moscow: IE RAN Publ., 212.

Kvashnina, N. A. & Oreshkova, M. E. (2011). Sistematizatsiya podkhodov k ponimaniyu gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v Rossii i za. In Russian [Systematization of approaches to understanding public-private partnerships in Russia and abroad]. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta [Bulletin of Financial University], 6(66), 5–12.

Litvyakov, S. S. (2013). Otbor i otsenka effektivnosti proektov v sfere razvitiya transportnoy infrastruktury dlya ikh realizatsii na osnove GChP [Selection and evaluation of the effectiveness of projects in the sphere of development of transport infrastructure for their realization on the basis of state-private partnership]. Natsionalnyye interesy. Prioritety i bezopasnost [National interests: priorities and security], 44(233), 36–47.

Kleyner, G. B. (2016). Ekonomika. Modelirovanie. Matematika. Izbrannye trudy [Economics. Modeling. Math. Selected works]. Moscow: TsEMI RAN Publ., 856.

Furubotn, E. G. & Rikhter, R. (2005). Instituty i ekonomicheskaya teoriya. Dostizheniya novoy institutsionalnoy ekonomicheskoy teorii. In Russian [Institutions and economic theory: Achievements of new institutional economic theory]. Trans. from English under ed. by V. S. Katkalo, N. P. Drozdovoy. St. Petersvurg: Sankt-Peterburgsky gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 34, 702.

Tsvetkov, V. A., Zoidov, K. Kh. & Medkov, A. A. (2014). Formirovanie evolyutsionnoy modeli transportno-tranzitnoy sistemy Rossii v usloviyakh integratsii i globalizatsii. In Russian [The evolutionary formation of model of transport-transit system of Russia in conditions of integration and globalization]. Moscow: IPR RAN Publ.; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 800.

Yakunin, V. I. (2006). Politologiya transporta. Politicheskoye izmerenie transportnogo razvitiya In Russian [Political science of transport. The political dimension of transport development]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 432.

Bult-Spiering, M. & Dewulf, G. (2006). Strategic Issues in Public-Private Partnerships: an International Perspective. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. UK, 216.

Flinders, M. (2005). The Politics of Public-Private Partnerships. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 215–239.

Kenneth, J., Button, R., David, A. & Hensher, A. (2005). Handbook of Transport Strategy, Policy and Institutions. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier, 12.

Lee, S. (2006). Public-Private Partnerships for Development: A Hand-book for Business. Washington, DC: USAID and the Committee for Economic Development, 30.

Downloads

Published

01.02.2017

How to Cite

Tsvetkov, V. A., Zoidov, K. K., & Medkov, A. A. (2017). Public-Private Partnership as the Core Form of the Implementation of Russia’s Transport and Transit Potential. Economy of Regions, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-1

Issue

Section

Research articles