Regional Differences in Equivalence Scales in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-6Keywords:
equivalence scales, child costs, regional equivalence scales, Engel curve, regional differences, almost ideal demand system, poverty measurement, poverty indicators, Turkey, HBS, NUTSAbstract
Equivalence scales have a crucial role in poverty measurement. For Turkey, there are no available up-to-date equivalence scales, representing Turkish data. There were no efforts for calculation of equivalence scales at the regional level. The aim of the paper is to calculate and propose an equivalence scale for Turkey and estimate regional differences. Besides the models with Engel method, different equivalence scales were estimated by Almost Ideal Demand System. The results of the first model of AIDS approach composed of 5 age groups, is proposed for Turkey, but for simplicity the results of the second AIDS model could be used as well. In this model, the equivalence scale for Turkey is calculated as 0.65 for each additional adult after the first one and 0.35 for each child. For regional equivalence scales, we use two methods and comare the results. In the first one, regressions were run for each region separately and in the second one, dummy variables introduced. The highest difference in the results of the two methods was observed in Istanbul region. The findings for the regional scales are less reliable as the household size is bigger. This limitation is due to the relatively small size of the data sets. Having surveys with higher sample sizes would enable better results. After getting the results some conclusions could be drawn especially with regard to child cost differences among regions. It was expected to have higher costs for children in poorer regions and the regional results have confirmed this hypothesis.References
Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Schmauss, G., &. Smeeding, T. (1988). Equivalence Scales, Well-being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database. Review of Income and Wealth, 34, 115-142.
Hagenaars, A. J. M., de Vos, K. & Zaidi, M. A. (1994). Poverty Statistics in the late 1980s: Research in micro-data. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg, 415.
Engel, E., (1895). Die Lebenskosten Belgischer Arbeiter-Familien Früher and Jetzt. International Statistical Institute Bulletin, 9, 1-74.
Barten, A. P. (1964). Family Composition, Prices and Expenditure Patterns. Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning. Ed. by Peter E. Hart, Gordon Mills, and John K. Whitaker. London: Butterworths (for Colston Res. Soc.), 320.
Gorman, T. (1976). Tricks With Utility Functions. Essays in Economic Analysis: Proceedings of the 1975 AUTE Conference, Sheffield. Ed. by M. J. Artis and A. R. Nobay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 292.
Pollak, R. A. & Wales, T. J. (1981). Demographic Variables in Demand Analysis. Econometrica, 49, 1533-1551.
Lewbel, A. (1985). A Unified Approach to Incorporating Demographic or Other Effects into Demand Systems. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 1-18.
Deaton, A. & Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. The American Economic Review, 70, 312-326.
Ray R. (1983) "Measuring the cost of children: an alternative approach" Journal of Public Economics, vol. 22, pp. 89-102.
Charlier, E. (2002). Equivalence scales in an intertemporal setting with an application to the former West Germany. Review of Income and Wealth, 48, 99-126.
Pendakur, K. (2005). Semiparametric estimation of lifetime equivalence scales. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20, 487-507.
Kot, S. (2014). Inter-temporal equivalence scales based on stochastic indifference criterion: the case of Poland. Paper presented to the IARIW 33rd General Conference, Rotterdam, August 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.iariw.org/papers/2014/KotPaper.pdf (date of access: 11.03.2016).
Betti, G. & Lundgren, L. (2012). The impact of remittances and equivalence scales on poverty in Tajikistan. Central Asian Survey, 31(4), 395-408.
Dudek, H. (2014). Do shares of food expenditure in the European Union converge? A country-level panel data analysis. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 48(4), 245-260.
Muellbauer, J. & Van de Ven, J. (2004). Equivalence Scales and Taxation: A Simulation Analysis. In Dagum C., Ferrari G. (Eds). Household Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. New York: Springer, 85-106.
Balli, F. & Tiezzi, S. (2010). Equivalence scales, the cost of children and household consumption patterns in Italy. Review of Economics of the Household, 8(4), 527-549.
Majumder, A. & Chakrabarty, M. (2010). Estimating Equivalence Scales Through Engel Curve Analysis. In: Basu B., Chakravarty S.R., Chakrabarti B.K., Gangopadhyay K. (Eds). Econophysics and Economics of Games, Social Choices and Quantitative Techniques. Springer: New York, 241-251.
Rojas, M. (2014). Household Equivalence Scale. Encyclopaedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 2947-2950.
Sengul, H. (2006). Equivalent Scale on Food Consumption in Turkey. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6, 1172-1175.
Sengul, S., & Cafri, R. (2010). Yoksulluk Ölçümünde Engel Ve Rothbarth Eçdegerlik Ölçekleri. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Cilt 19, Sayi 2, Sayfa 47-61.
Betti, G., Karadag, M. A., Sarica, O. & Ucar, B. (2016). How to Reduce the Impact of Equivalence Scales on Poverty Measurerement: Evidence from Turkey. Social Indicators Research. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1335-0.
Van Ginneken, W. (1982). Generating Internationally Comparable Income Distribution Data: Evidence from the Federal Republic of Germany (1974), Mexico (1968) and the United Kingdom (1979). The Review of Income and Wealth, 28, 365-379.
Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1986). On Measuring Child Costs: With Applications to Poor Countries. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 720-744.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Gianni Betti, Mehmet Ali Karadag, Ozlem Sarica, Baris Ucar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
