Comparative Positioning of SMEs in Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines

Авторы

  • Muhammad Mahboob Ali Dhaka School of Economics
  • Vichayanan Rattanawiboonsom Naresuan University
  • Candido M. Perez Philippines University
  • Abdullah Abusayed Khan Khulna University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-5

Ключевые слова:

Bangladesh, banking sector, community banking, capital market, economic boom, income, Philippine, poverty, SMEs, SDGs, Thailand, trade

Аннотация

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role in the nation’s economic development process. SMEs provide job opportunities, create wealth, promote modernization and contribute to technological changes. The Asia-Pacific Region is foreseen to be the next economic boom. A comparison of SMEs in Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines on their SMEs Landscape, Banking sector, Non-Banking sector and Capital Markets would give a picture of which strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats these countries face. The time period of the study is from August 2016 to January 2017. Based on the secondary sources of data, the research was conducted to examine real scenarios. The study aimed at getting information whether each country would have any benchmark to attain the best practices. The study found that SMEs credit and repayment schemes in these countries need to be gradually improved. Through proper utilization of SMEs, these countries can alleviate poverty and attain economic progress. Unfortunately, the informal sector of these countries is playing a large role. It should be transformed to formal sector by financial inclusion. This can be achieved by setting up SMEs in the formal sector.The creation of employment along with poverty reduction in the formal sector will enhance economic growth as well as fulfill the basic needs and create empowerment of people. Community banking is suggested to be introduced for accumulating micro-savings and allocating, distributing setting up SMEs in the formal sector through micro investment under the umbrella of community banking. Further, under the regional cooperation flagship of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) Bangladesh and Thailand may work in collaborative manner in the SMEs sector. The Philippines may join the regional body of BIMSTEC and collaborate with SMEs at the regional level. This may lead to achieve some goals of sustainable development goals (SDGs). SMEs can work more rigorously for lower income group people to improve their living standard. The further research on these three countries can consider primary sources of data to find out the way to implement community bank for transforming micro savings to micro investment for removing income inequality, disparity and attaining social justice.

Биографии авторов

Muhammad Mahboob Ali, Dhaka School of Economics

PhD in Social Sciences, Post Doctorate, Professor, Dhaka School of Economics (Economic Association Building, 4/C Eskaton Garden Road,Ramna, Dhaka1000, Bangladesh; e-mail:pipulbd@gmail.com).

Vichayanan Rattanawiboonsom, Naresuan University

PhD in Mangment, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Business, Economics and Communications, Naresuan University (Thaplo, Muang, Phitsanuloke 65000, Thailand; e-mail: vichayananr@nu.ac.th).

Candido M. Perez, Philippines University

PhD in Business, Professor, College of Business and Accountancy, Lyceum of the Philippines University (Laguna, Philippines; e-mail: candido_perez@lpulaguna.edu.com/candidomperez@yahoo.com).

Abdullah Abusayed Khan, Khulna University

PhD in Social Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Khulna University (Bangladesh; e-mail:khanbdnks@yahoo.com).

Библиографические ссылки

Wanida, W. (2015). The Japanese and local partner relationship on Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs) and International Joint ventures (IJVs). Performance in Thailand Industrial sectors. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 36(4), 1-24.

Watson, J. (2010). SME Performance: Separating Myth from Reality. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gibson, T. & Vander Vaart, H. J. (2008). Defining SMEs. A less imperfect way of defining Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries. Brookings Global Economy and Development, 1-29.

Moazzem, K. G. (2006, September). Meeting the Challenges in SME Development in Bangladesh: Special Reference to Government’s Budgetary Measures. KATALYST Bangladesh, p-30.

Hallberg, K. (2000). A Market-Oriented Strategy for Small and Medium Scale Enterprise. World Bank and International Finance Corporation, 22-23

Khan, E. A., Khan, M. S. & Md, N. A. (2005). Factors Affecting the Growth of Entrepreneurship in Small-Scale Business. Business Review, 5(1), 33-37.

Susman, G. I. (2007). Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and the Global Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, 1-10.

Mohiudddin, M. et al. (2 007). Entrepreneurship Development. MBA Program. School of Business. Bangladesh Open University, 343.

Tambunan, T. (2008, April). Development of SME in ASEAN with Reference to Indonesia and Thailand. Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics, 20(1), 53-83.

Ali, M. M. (2017). Socio-Economic Development of Bangladesh: Sustainability of BNF’s partner organizations and Beneficiaries, MTC Global. India, 9-77.

Raffiee, J. & Feng, J. (2014). Should I quit my day job? A Hybrid path to Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 936-963.

Hisrich, R. D. & Peter, M. (2002). Entrepreneurship, 5th ed. Tata McGrawhill Publishing Company Ltd., India.

Hoque, M. Z. (2004). Industrial Loan Default - The case of Bangladesh. The University Press Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh, 8-21.

Habaradas, R. B. (2009). The challenges of SME innovation and technology upgrading in developing economies: insights from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Journal of International Business Research, 8(1).

Moreno-Monroy, A. I. et al. (2014). Formal sector subcontracting and informal sector employment in Indian manufacturing. IZA Journal of Labor & Development, 3(1), 1. Springer. DOI: 10.1186/s40175-014-0022-2.

Rattanawiboonsom, V. & Ali, M. M. (2016). Factors affecting entrepreneurial management in Bangladesh: an empirical analysis. Student Ways, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Watson, J. (2010). SME Performance: Separating Myth from Reality. Edward Elgar Publishing, 3-153.

Hampel-Milagrosa, Aimee (2014). Micro and Small Enterprise Upgrading in the Philippines: The role of the entrepreneur, enterprise, networks and business environment, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik gGmbH, Bonn, pp. 9-14.

Sheng, A., Chow, S. N. & Edelmann, C. Asia Finance 2020. Framing a New Asian Financial Architecture. Oliver Wyman Fund Global Institute, p. 18.

Woolley, J. L. (2014). The Creation and Configuration of Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship in Emerging Domains of Activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 721-747. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12017.

Ahmad, Q. K. (2004). Development of Whom for Whom by Whom. Mowla Brothers, Dhaka, 10-334.

Baimai, C. & Mukherji, A. (2015). International entrepreneurial culture of Thai SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 5, 1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s40497-015-0041-8.

Roxas, B. & Chadee, D. (2016, November). Knowledge management view of environmental sustainability in manufacturing SMEs in the Philippines. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14(4), 514-524. DOI:10.1057/kmrp.2015.30.

Ahmad, Q. K. (2014). Sustainable development: Bangladesh Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal on Environment and Development, 22, 23, 81-90.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2017-06-13

Как цитировать

Ali, M. M., Rattanawiboonsom, V., Perez, C. M., & Khan, A. A. (2017). Comparative Positioning of SMEs in Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines. Экономика региона, 13(2), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-5

Выпуск

Раздел

Исследовательские статьи