Transformation of Pension Systems in the Countries of Eurasian Economic Union

Authors

  • Sergey Aleksandrovich Dyatlov Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7724-6373
  • Grigory Feliksovich Feygin Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics
  • Lyudmila Fedorovna Lebedeva Institute for the USA and Canadian Studies of RAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-14

Keywords:

pension system, pension reform, comparative analysis, countries, Eurasian Economic Union, harmonization of the pension systems, pension law, structure, pension payment, integration

Abstract

Current integration processes, develop actively on the territory of Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). A single labour market has been created. Building a model of social interaction between the State Parties of EEU is crucial for the development of longterm strategy of the EEU. The Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union (2014) provides identifying factors, threats and potential areas of cooperation between the EEU countries in the sphere of pension services. This identification requires systematizing the key indicators of EEU national pension systems. There is a necessity to improve not only the pension system of every country individually but also to search the possibilities for their coordination in the future. From the beginning of 1990th, in all EEU countries, the pension systems have been establishing and developing. The authors present the brief review and comparative analysis of these systems. We identify their similarities and differences according to set criteria and determine possible areas for integration of pension systems in EEU. We consider both the socio-economic parameters (including retirement age, amount of pension payments, pension payment procedures and pattern of pension payments) and the demographic features of the EEU countries. The paper systematizes the macroeconomic and population indicators. On their basis, we reveal the opportunities and risks for the EEU countries cooperation in the sphere of pension system. To investigate the pension systems of EEU countries, we applied the methods of logical, comparative and statistical analysis. The results of this study indicate that the coordination of the pension systems of EEU countries needs cooperation in four directions. First of all, it is necessary to elaborate the single principles of social guarantees for retirees. Secondly, there is a need to ensure guaranteed retirement income. Thirdly, single basic approaches for the regulation of investment activities of pension funds should be elaborated. Last, single data bank for pension provision can be created.

Author Biographies

Sergey Aleksandrovich Dyatlov, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics; Scopus Author ID: 56755378700, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7724-6373 (21, Sadovaya St., Saint-Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation; e-mail: oetdsa@yandex.ru).

Grigory Feliksovich Feygin, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics (21, Sadovaya St., Saint-Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation; e-mail: fgrig@list.ru).

Lyudmila Fedorovna Lebedeva, Institute for the USA and Canadian Studies of RAS

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Centre for Social and Economic Research and Projects, Institute for the USA and Canadian Studies of RAS; Scopus Author ID: 56808936800, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4464-2916, Researcher ID: S-6937–2016 (2/3 Khlebny Lane, Moscow, 123995, Russian Federation; e-mail: liudran@mail.ru).

References

ЕAndresen, B. (2001). Chancen und Risiken für die betriebliche Altersversorgung nach der Rentenreform. Altersvorsorge in 3 Säulen, 41–71.

Davis, E. (1998). Policy implementation issues in reforming pension system, EBRD. London, 22.

Fougerelles, J. (1996). Pension Privatization in Latin America — Lessons for Central and Eastern Europe. Russian and East-European Finance and Trade. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 32(3), 86–104.

Müller, K. (1999). The political economy of pension reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham & Northampton MA: Edward Elgar, 154.

Rürup, B. (2001). Licht und Schatten der Rentenreform. Altersvorsorge in 3 Säulen, 75–96.

Lodahl, M. (2001). Demographische Probleme belasten Wirtschaft. Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 2, 171–184.

Schrooten, M. & Lodahl, M. (1998). Transformation des polnischen Rentensystems. Osteuropa-Wirtschaft, 3, 199–208.

Lebedeva, L. & Feiguine, G. (2015). The Pension Systems in the Group of Seven Countries: The Current State, Prospects of Development, and References for Russia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 388–394.

Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A. & Tabellini, G. (2002). Pension Reforms and the Options of European Citizens. American Economic Review, 92(2), 396–401.

Börsch-Supan, A. & Wilke, C. (2004). The German Public Pension System: How it was, how it will be. MRC Working paper 41. Michigan Retirement research center, 57.

Maurer, R. (2004). Welche Sicherheit und Rendite bietet die kapitalgedeckte Alterssicherung. Kritische Vierteljahreszeitschrift fuer Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, 3, 318–324.

Gurvich, E. (2011). Printsipy novoy pensionnoy reformy [Principles of new pension reform]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 4, 4–31. (In Russ.)

Karabchuk, T. S., Kostenko, V. V., Almakaeva, A. M., Soboleva, N. E. & Zhyusten, A. (2014). Mobilnost pensii v ramkakh Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza i SNG Doklad № 24 [Mobility of pension within the Eurasian Economic Union and the CIS. Report № 24]. Saint Petersburg: Tsentr integratsionnykh issledovaniy Publ., 103. (In Russ.)

Zverev, P. B. (Ed.). O zakonodatelnoy praktike pensionnogo obespecheniya v gosudarstvakh Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva [On the legislative practice of pension coverage in the states of the Euroasian economic community]. Materialy zasedaniya po itogam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, SPb., 22 dek. 2011 g. [Proceedings following the results of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. St. Petersburg, December 22, 2011]. Saint Petersburg: Levsha Publ., 144. (In Russ.)

Borisenko, I. (2010). Pensionnaya reforma i pensionnyye nakopleniya [Increasing Importance of Savings Mechanisms for Forming Pensions in Modern Conditions]. Rossiyskoye predprinimatelstvo [Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship], 2, 41–46. (In Russ.)

Eroshenkov, S. (2001). Pensionnaya reforma v rossiyskikh usloviyakh [Pension reform in the Russian conditions]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economy], 10, 155–174. (In Russ.)

Kann, M. (2006). Reformirovanie pensionnoy sistemy v Rossii [Reforming of pension system in Russia]. EKO [ECO], 6, 30–46. (In Russ.)

Maleva, T. M. & Sinyavskaya, O. V. (2005). Pensionnaya reforma v Rossii. O politicheskoy ekonomii populizma [Pension reform in Russia: about political economy of populism]. Otechestvennyye zapiski [National Proceedings], 3, 14–26. (In Russ.)

Teslenko, M. O. (2015). Izmeneniya v pensionnoy sisteme Rossii v 2016 godu [Changes in the pension system of Russia in 2016]. Molodoy uchenyy [Young Scientist], 24, 599–601. (In Russ.)

Maurer, R., Feygin, G. F. & Rogalla, R. (2011). Nakopitelnaya chast pensii kak element formirovaniya pensionnykh sistem v Rossii i Germanii [Rent capitalization as a part of pension reforms in Germany and Russia]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov [Proceedings of Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics], 6, 13–20. (In Russ.)

Dyatlov, S. A., Vasiltsova, V. M., Vasiltsov, V. S., Bezrukova, T. L. & Bezrukov, B. A. (2015). Methodology of Management Innovation Hypercompetition. Asian Social Science, 11(20), 165–169.

Published

27.11.2017

How to Cite

Dyatlov, S. A., Feygin, G. F., & Lebedeva, L. F. (2017). Transformation of Pension Systems in the Countries of Eurasian Economic Union. Economy of Regions, 13(4), 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-14

Issue

Section

Research articles