Relationship between Regional Socio-Economic Development and Corporate Ratings of Russian Companies

Authors

  • Elena Yu. Makeeva National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
  • Irina V. Ivashkovskaya National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
  • Liudmila S. Ruzhanskaya Ural Federal University
  • Konstantin A. Popov National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-7

Keywords:

socio-economic development of regions, investment attractiveness of regions, rating of socio-economic development of Russian regions, sustainable development of (cities) regions, non-financial sector, corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility, environmental responsibility, corporate ratings, performance

Abstract

The search for new sources of regional development is important due to the slowdown in economic growth and the need to shift the emphasis of industrial policy from the macro level to the level of regions and individual companies. In this regard, we consider the participation of companies in reputation ratings as a new source for increasing the investment attractiveness of regions. Additionally, we examine the relationship between corporate and regional ratings: corporate ratings demonstrate a company’s compliance with the sustainable development goals, which, in turn, improves the socio-economic performance of regions. We revealed the positive influence of high corporate ratings on the socio-economic development of regions, opening a new area for interdisciplinary research combining corporate finance and regional economics. On the example of 130 biggest Russian public non-financial companies, we obtained several significant results that allow determining the impact of corporate ratings on the socio-economic situation of regions and corporate financial performance. The ratings include Sustainable development Index of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RUIE), Environmental responsibility rating of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Russia, and Corporate social responsibility rating of the Association of Managers of Russia (AMR). The calculations showed that the participation of companies in the ratings of WWF Russia and RUIE positively affects the indicators sustainable development of regions where these companies are located. Simultaneously, the influence of companies’ participation in the rating of WWF Russia is higher than the influence of participation in the RUIE rating. In addition, reputation ratings have a positive impact on the return on assets and market capitalisation of Russian companies. Thus, we proved that participation in corporate ratings leads to an increase in performance. However, the effects of participation in various ratings differ. For example, to increase its conditions and performance, a company should be a leader of the rating of RUIE and just participate in the rating of WWF Russia. The rating of AMR influences the market capitalisation the most. The obtained findings indicate the need for expanding the participation of Russian companies in corporate ratings and enable research in the field of sustainable development of companies.

Author Biographies

Elena Yu. Makeeva, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the School of Finance, Faculty of Economic Sciences

Irina V. Ivashkovskaya, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Tenured Professor, Head of the School of Finance, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Head of Corporate Finance Center

Liudmila S. Ruzhanskaya, Ural Federal University

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Head of the Academic Department of International Economics and Management, Graduate School of Economics and Management

Konstantin A. Popov, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

PhD Student of Doctoral School of Economics

References

Karminskiy, A. M. & Trofimova, E. A. (2011). The role of ratings in the development of business processes of russian banks. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta [MGIMO Review of International Relations], 4, 12–26. (In Russ.)

Savaley, V. V. (2017). Gross regional product as an indicator of territorial economy efficiency and development level. Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostey. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa [The Territory of New Opportunities. The Herald of Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service], 2, 31–43. (In Russ.)

Smirnova, N. A. (2005). Regional asymmetry in the Russian Federation: a statistical aspect. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta [St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies], 2, 118–125. (In Russ.)

Dertishnikova, E. N. (2011). Integrative evaluation of socio-economic development of Russia’s regions. Problemy razvitiya territorii [Problems of territory’s development], 1(53), 25–35. (In Russ.)

Kuklin, A. A. & Korobkov, I. V. (2018). Selection of an Effective Trajectory of Regional Socio-Economic Development. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 14(4), 1145–1155. (In Russ.)

Fombrun, C. J. & Rindova, V. P. (1996). Who’s tops and who decides? The social construction of corporate reputations. Working Paper. New York University, Stern School of Business.

Flatt, S. J., & Kowalczyk, S. J. (2000). Do corporate reputations partly reflect external perceptions of organizational culture? Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4), 351–358. DOI: doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540125.

Min, M., Desmoulins-Lebeault, F. & Esposito, M. (2017). Should pharmaceutical companies engage in corporate social responsibility? Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 58–70. DOI: doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09–2014–0103.

Chernev, A. & Blair, S. (2015). Doing well by doing good: the benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412–1425. DOI: doi.org/10.1086/680089.

Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978.

Cao, Y., Myers, L. A. & Omer, T. C. (2011). Does company reputation matter for financial reporting quality: Evidence from restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 956–990. DOI: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1317343.

Huynh, Q. L. (2018). Earnings quality with reputation and performance. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(2), 269–278. DOI: doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.82.269.278.

Luchs, C., Stuebs, M. & Sun, L. (2009) Corporate reputation and earnings quality. Journal of Applied Business Research, 25(4), 47–54. DOI: doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v25i4.1016.

Tan, H. S. (2008). Does the reputation matter: Corporate reputation and earnings quality. Journal of Modern Accounting & Auditing, 4(8), 53–70. DOI: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1013127.

Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–0335.2009.00843.x.

Krueger, P. (2015). Corporate Goodness and Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329. DOI: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2287089.

Wang, Y.-S. & Chen, Y.-J. (2017) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Event study cases. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 12(2), 193–219. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11403–015–0161–9.

Ankudinov, A. B. & Borisov, D. M. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Factor for Long-Term Growth. Isvestiya Uralskogo gosudarsvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Journal of the Ural State University of Economics], 1(45), 109–114. (In Russ.)

Sackley, H. W. & Vashakmadze, T. T. (2014). The enhancement of equity valuations in developed and emerging markets through the use of sustainable investment indicators. Korporativnye finansy [Journal of Corporate Finance Research], 2(30), 53–57. DOI: doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073–0438.8.2.2014.54–58/

Kelchevskaya, N. R., Chernenko, I. M. & Popova, E. V. (2017). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Investment Attractiveness of the Russian Companies. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 13(1), 157–169. (In Russ.)

Carini, C., Comincioli, N., Poddi, L. & Vergalli, S. (2017). Measure the performance with the Market Value Added: Evidence from CSR companies. Sustainability, 9(12), 1–19. DOI: doi.org/10.3390/su9122171.

Gizatullin, A. V. (2007). Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian management journal], 5(1), 35–66. (In Russ.)

Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.

Bowman, Е. H. & Mason, Н. (1975). A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18, 49–58. DOI: doi.org/10.2307/41164638.

Altman, E. I. & Hotchkiss, E. S. (2006). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt. 3rd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 368.

Delcoure N. (2007). The determinants of capital structure in transitional economies. International Review of Economics and Finance, 16(3), 400–415. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2005.03.005.

Published

29.03.2021

How to Cite

Makeeva, E. Y., Ivashkovskaya, I. V., Ruzhanskaya, L. S., & Popov, K. A. (2021). Relationship between Regional Socio-Economic Development and Corporate Ratings of Russian Companies. Economy of Regions, 17(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-7

Issue

Section

Research articles