Sustainability of the EU-28 Trade with China and the USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-17Keywords:
foreign trade, surplus, deficit, Europe, China, USA, competitiveness, factors of growth, sustainability, germanyAbstract
There has been a lot of debate in global politics about fair trade, surpluses (also called positive trade accounts), and deficits (negative trade accounts) among the USA, China and the European Union (EU). The study aims to analyse the countries’ trade accounts through the lenses of international finance theory. Based on financial analytical models, the countries’ competitiveness and changes in their net foreign wealth were examined. The factors considered in the literature review are as follows: exchange rate, government tariff and tax policies, saving rate, manufacturing base, investments, natural resource abundance and others. The computation of the trade accounts was conducted using the ten-year international trade data (2009-2018) for the EU-28 member countries that became the main importer for China instead of the USA in 2019. The conducted empirical research showed that Chinese trade has continuous deficits throughout European countries, and in some countries, it could be considered as an increasingly important structural issue (for example, in Poland and the Czech Republic). Trade with the USA, in turn, typically produces surplus for European countries, where Germany is the leader. The provided conclusions hold value for international trade managers in terms of their potential influence on public policy in the researched countries. In light of the financial crisis, the current export shock could be used by countries as an occasion to change the course and depart from the assumptions, which do not advocate for free trade.References
Steinbock, D. (2018). U.S.-China trade war and it global impacts. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(4), 515–542.
Liu, L-J., Creutxig, F., Yao, Y-F., Wei, Y-M. & Liang, Q-M. (2020). Environmental and economic impacts of trade barriers: The example of China-US trade friction. Resource and Energy Economics, 59, 101144.
Năsulea, C., Crețu, B. N. & Spînu, D. F. (2015). How sanctions on Russia impact the economy of the European Union. Studies in Business and Economics, 10(3), 147–157.
Rickards, J. (2011). Currency Wars — The making of the next global crisis. Penguin Books, New York, USA, 318.
The Economist (2018). Exit the dragon — A Chinese ban on rubbish imports is shaking up the global junk trade. The Economist, 428(9111), 7–8.
Wang, C., Xhao, L., Lim, M. K., Chen, W-Q. & Sutherland, J. W. (2020). Structure of the global plastic waste trade network and the impact of China’s import ban. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 153, 104591.
Falkowski, K. (2018). Competitiveness of the Baltic States in international hightechnology goods trade. Comparative Economic Research, 21(1), 25–43.
Czarny, E. & Zmuda, M. (2018). Competitiveness as the ability to adjust: The EU–10 exports structure and its convergence to the German pattern. Comparative Economic Research, 21(1), 119–133.
Kordalska, A. & Olczyk, M. (2014). Impact of the manufacturing sector on the export competitiveness of European countries — A spatial panel analysis. Comparative Economic Research, 17(4), 105–120.
Priewe, J. (2018). A time bomb for the Euro? Understanding Germany’s current account surplus. IMK Studies No. 59. IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, 96.
Hill, C. W. L & Hult, G. T. M. (2018). International Business. University of Washington, USA, 715.
Briman, A. & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed). Oxford University: United Kingdom Press, UK, 806.
Novikov, A. M. & Novikov, D. A. (2010). Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya [Methodology of Scientific Research]. Moscow: LIBROKOM, 660. (In Russ.)
Krugman, P. R., Obstefeld, M. & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International Finance: Theory and Policy. Pearson Education, London, UK, 465.
Miles, H. E. (1922). Hearings Before Committee on Finance, United States Senate, on the Proposed Tariff Act of 1921 (HR 7456). US Government Printing Office, USA, 5419.
Makin, A. J. (2007). Does China’s huge external surplus imply an undervalued Renminbi? China & World Economy, 15(3), 89–102.
Mastel, G. & Szamosszegi, A. Z. (1997). China’s growing trade surplus: Why it matters. Washington Quarterly, 20(2), 201–212.
Gräf, B. (2007). US current account deficit: No reason to panic! CESifo Forum, 8(4), 31–38.
Leightner, J. E. (2010). Are the forces that cause China’s trade surplus with the USA good? Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 3(1), 43–53.
Springford, J. & Tilford, S. (2013). Why Germany’s trade surplus is bad for the Eurozone. CER Bulletin, 93, 3–4.
Hays, J., Lim, J. & Spoon, J-J. (2019). The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Electoral Studies, 60, 102038.
Milberg, W. & Winkler, D. (2013). Outsourcing Economics — Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 345.
Jain, N., Girotra, K. & Netessine S. (2014). Managing global sourcing: Inventory performance. Management Science, 60(5), 1202–1222.
Bhalla, S. S. (2012). Devaluing to Prosperity: Misaligned currencies and their growth consequences. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, USA, 263.
Das, S. (2012). Traders, Guns and Money. Financial Times Publishing, Great Britain, 401.
Makin, T. & PMB, G. C. (2006). China’s growing trade surplus: causes, consequences and policy implications. In: ACESA2006 Emerging China: Internal Challenges and Global Implications (pp. 13–14). Victoria University, Melbourne.
Garcia-Herrero, A. & Koivu, T. (2007). Can the Chinese trade surplus be reduced through exchange rate policy? BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 6/2007. Institute for Economics in Transition, Helsinki, Finland, 36.
Palley, T. I. (2011). The rise and fall of export led growth. Levy Economics Institute of Bard University working paper, No. 675, 24.
Zhang, Z. (2010). China in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6638–6653.
Simon, H. (1992). Service policies of German manufacturers: Critical factors in international competition. European Management Journal, 10(4), 404–411.
Andreson, J. E., Larch, M. & Yotov, Y. V. (2019). Trade and investment in the global economy: A multi-country dynamic analysis. European Economic Review, 120, 103311.
Jean, S., Martin, P. & Sapir, A. (2018). International trade under attack: what strategy for Europe? Notes du conseil d’analyse économique, 46, 1–12.
Torvik, R. (2009). Why do some resource-abundant countries succeed while others do not? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 241–256.
Ullah, I., Shah, M. & Khan, F. U. (2014). Domestic investment, foreign direct investment, and economic growth nexus: A case of Pakistan. Economics Research International, 1, 1–5.
Poole, W. & Wheelock, D. (2008). Stable Prices, Stable Economy. The Regional Economist, 9.
Mishkin, F. S. (2001). From monetary targeting to inflation targeting: lessons from industrialized countries. The World Bank, 39.
Lederman, D. & Maloney, W. F. (2003). Trade structure and growth. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, Washington, USA, 23.
Stewart, J. (2011). Corporation Tax: How Important is the 12.5 % Corporate Tax Rate in Ireland? Financial Times, 8, 12.
Chen, C. H., Mai, C. C. & Yu, H. C. (2006). The effect of export tax rebates on export performance: Theory and evidence from China. China Economic Review, 17(2), 226–235.
Chandra, P. & Long, C. (2013). VAT rebates and export performance in China: Firm-level evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 102(C), 13–22.
Choroś-Mrozowska, D. (2019). The Chinese belt and road initiative from the Polish perspective. Comparative Economic Research, 22(2), 39–53.
Varoufakis, Y. (2016). And the Weak Suffer What They Must? Vintage, Penguin Random House, London, UK, 336.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). The Euro: How Common Currency Threatens the Future of Europe. First Edition. W. W. Norton & Company, London, UK, 395.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Olli-Pekka Hilmola, Yulia Panova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
