Institutional Framework for Synthesis of Market and A Priori Approaches to Industrial Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-8Abstract
The spread of anti-globalisation trends against various forms of economic internationalisation requires the adjustment of the system of economic management in general and industrial policy in particular. Using new institutional approaches, the paper examines industrial policy along with the market subsystem and non-market regulated sectors. All these subsystems interact through the intersection of conventions between economic agents. Industrial convention is characterised by continuous production, technology demands compliance, and standards as an information source (as opposed to the market convention that relies on prices). The research shows that the circulation of production means cannot function only based on universal norms of market behaviour, as it happens in the movement of high liquidity consumer goods. Circulation of production means can be determined by long-term agreements, engineering performance specifications and set prices. The paper demonstrates that the inefficient use of market instruments in the innovation sector may lead to state intervention in the circulation of production means. Therefore, by choosing a coordinated, associative management approach, industrial policy can focus on the creation and implementation of relevant strategic documents, as well as on the adjustment of interactions between economic agents and authorities. The presented findings can be used as a methodology for developing regional and national industrial policies.
References
Akhremenko, A. S., Lokshin, I. M. & Yureskul, Y. A. (2015). Economic Growth and Policy Choice in Authoritarian Regimes: “The Missing Link”. Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz [Politeia], 3(78), 50–74. DOI: 10.30570/2078–5089–2015–78–3-50–74. (In Russ.)
Ambroziak, A. A. (2017). A Theoretical Concept of a Modern Industrial Policy. In: A. Ambroziak (Eds.), The New Industrial Policy of the European Union. Contributions to Economics (pp. 173–186). Springer, Cham. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–39070–3_7.
Arsakhanova, Z. A., Aliev, B. H. & Sultanov, G. S. (2015). Need of industrial policy for economic development of the state. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya [Fundamental research], 9–2, 323–326. (In Russ.)
Baena, F., Guarina, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J. & Retat, S. (2017). Learning Factory: The Path to Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 73–80.
Carrubba, C. J., Yuen, A. & Zorn, Ch. (2007). In defense of comparative statics: Specifying empirical tests of models of strategic interaction. Political Analysis, 15, 465–482.
Coase, R. (2007). The Firm, the Market and the Law [Firma, rynok i pravo]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Novoye izdatelstvo Publishing, 224. (In Russ.)
Degtyarev, A. A. (2010). Prikladnoy politicheskiy analiz [Applied Political Analysis]. Moscow: MGIMO University, 546. (In Russ.)
Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economics Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frolov, V. G. & Kaminchenko, D. I. (2019). Methods of political-economic analysis application for conducting effective coordinated industrial policy in the digital economy context. Ekonomika, predprinimatelstvo i pravo [Journal of economics, entrepreneurship and law], 4(9), 289–300. DOI: doi.org/10.18334/epp.9.4.41417. (In Russ.)
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Rational Behaviors. In: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 263–268). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and Institutions. A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 365.
Imai, K. & Strauss, A. (2011). Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects from randomized experiments, with application to the optimal planning of the Get-Out-the-Vote campaign. Political Analysis, 19, 1–19.
Kayukov, A. V. (2006). Sovershenstvovanie mekhanizma obespecheniya promyshlennykh predpriyatiy kreditnymi resursami: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. Na primere Severo-Zapada Rossii: dis…kand. ekon. nauk. [Improving the mechanism of providing industrial enterprises with credit resources: theory, methodology, practice (on the example of the North-West of Russia). Abstract of the Thesis of Cand. Sci. (Econ.)]. Syktyvkar, 24. (In Russ.)
Kayukov, V. V. (1996). Stanovlenie rynka investitsionnykh tovarov v Rossii: dis. … d-ra ekon. nauk [Formation of the market of investment goods in Russia: the dissertation of a doctor of economic sciences. Thesis of Dr. Sci. (Econ.)]. Saint-Petersburg, 289. (In Russ.)
Leontief, W. (1990). Essays in economics. Theories, theorizing, facts and policies [Ekonomicheskiye esse. Teorii, issledovaniya, fakty i politika]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Politizdat, 415. (In Russ.)
Lyakin, A. N. (2014). The State’s Secret. Bookreview: Grinberg R. S., Rubinstein A. Y. The Individual & the State: economic dilemma. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta [St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies], 4(Series 5), 128–131. (In Russ.)
Nowak, M. & Highfield, R. (2012). SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. N.Y.: Free-Press, 352.
Nureev, R. M. (2005). Teoriya obshchestvennogo vybora [Theory of Public Choice]. Мoscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 531. (In Russ.)
Rap, E. (2007). Cultural performance, resource flows and passion in politics: A situational analysis of an election rally in Western Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 39, 595–625.
Romanova, O. A. (2018). Industrial policy as a modern instrument of forming ecologically and socially friendly space. Izvestiya UGGU [News of the Ural State Mining University], 2(50), 135–141. DOI: doi.org/10.21440/2307–2091–2018–2-135–141. (In Russ.)
Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A. C., Araújo, M. & Ares, E. (2017). Towards Industry 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 972–979.
Tarando, E. (2017). On the question of public goods and public property. Ekonomist [Economist], 6, 49–54. (In Russ.)
Tatarkin, A. I. & Romanova, O. A. (2007). The industrial policy and the mechanism of its realization: the system approach. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 3, 19–31. (In Russ.)
Thévenot, L. (1997). The multiplicity of methods of coordination: Balance and rationality in a complex world. Trans. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 10, 69–84. (In Russ.)
Thévenot, L. (2006). Convention Theory: The Role of Institutional Inhomogeneity [Teoriya soglasheniy. Rol neodnorodnosti institutsionalnoy sredy]. Trans. Retrieved from: http://sbiblio.com/biblio/archive/teveno_nauka/ (Date of access: 20.06.2020). (In Russ.)
Tjahjono, B., Esplugues, C., Ares, E. & Pelaez, G. (2017). What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain? Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1175–1182.
Wolf, Jr. C. (1988). Markets or Governments. Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Economy of Regions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
