Regional Environmental Policy of the Far Eastern Federal District in the Context of National Strategic Goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-15Keywords:
environmental policy, green economy, content analysis, environmental programme, environmental protection, state programme, environmental indicators, ecological services of protected areasAbstract
In 2020, Russia and its regions adopted new national and regional development programmes, including in the field of environmental protection. Both strategic and tactical issues of environmental policy are addressed at the regional level. The results of previous programmes were disappointing for many reasons. Particularly, national interests are not always considered when developing regional environmental programmes. The present study analyses new environmental programmes adopted in regions of the Far Eastern Federal District and their connection to the federal environmental programme. It is hypothesised that there is a disconnect between the structure and objectives of regional programmes and federal environmental policy. The study analysed environmental safety regulations, government reports and environmental protection programmes of regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. Methods of quantitative and qualitative content analysis, comparative analysis, data visualisation, etc., were utilised. New environmental programmes of Far Eastern regions were reviewed. A conducted analysis of 153 target indicators for achieving the goals of regional programmes indicates a difference between them and the federal environmental programme. Only 50% of them take into account the federal programme guidelines. An internal content analysis of regional programmes revealed general priorities of the Far Eastern environmental policy: 44% of the indicators are related to the conservation of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, 21% of the indictors relate exclusively to issues of resource industries rather than to environmental protection; for example, 14% are related to the development of mineral resources. In general, 8 out of 11 programmes take into account the territory’s resource specialisation. Accordingly, recommendations for improving the structure and content of regional programmes were proposed. The results can be used to assess regional environmental policies and create environmental programmes for other territories.
References
Aganbegyan, A. G. (2019). Development of the Far East: a National Program in the Context of National Projects. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 15 (3), 165–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.3.165-181. (In Russ.)
Bobylev, S. N. (2007). Indikatory ustoychivogo razvitiya: regionalnoe izmerenie. Posobie po regionalnoy ekologicheskoy politike [Indicators of sustainable development: the regional dimension. A manual on regional environmental policy] . Moscow: Acropolis, CEPR, 60. (In Russ.)
Bobylev, S. N. (2019). New economic models and indicators of sustainable development. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [The Economic revival of Russia], 3 (61), 23-29. (In Russ.)
Bobylev, S. N., & Grigoriev, L. M. (2017). Doklad o chelovecheskom razvitii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2017 god. Ekologicheskie prioritety dlya Rossii [The 2017 Report on human development in the Russian Federation entitled “Environmental priorities for Russia”] . Moscow: Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, 292. (In Russ.)
Boev, P. A., Burenko, D. L., Shvarts, E. A., Diep, A., Hanscom, L., Iha, K., Kelly, R., Martindill, J., Wackernagel, M. & Zokai, G. (2017). Ekologicheskiy sled subektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Osnovnye vyvody i rekomendatsii [Ecological Footprint of the Russian Regions] . Moscow, Russia: WWF Russia, 72. (In Russ.)
Conceição, P. (2020). UNDP. Human Development Report . New York: United Nations, 397. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2020.pdf
Dobrolyubova, E. I. (2017). Methodological Issues of Evaluating Effectiveness of State Programs. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii [Regional economy. The south of Russia], 1 , 95-105. (In Russ.)
Eaton, D., & Zhou, X. (2019). The Macroeconomics of a green economy. In: Inclusive Green Economy: Policies and Practice (pp. 32-61). Zayed International Foundation for the Environment & Tongji University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335834858_The_Macroeconomics_of_a_green_economy
Farrow, A., Miller, K. A., & Myllyvirta, L. (2020). Toxic air: The price of fossil fuels . Seoul: Greenpeace Southeast Asia, 44.
Fomenko, G. A., Fomenko, M. A., Michaylova, A. V., & Michaylova, T. R. (2010). Ekonomicheskaya otsenka osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriy Kamchatki: prakticheskie rezultaty i ikh znachenie dlya sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya (na primere prirodnogo parka «Bystrinskiy») [Economic evaluation of Kamchatka specially protected natural territories: practical results and their importance for biodiversity conservation (by example of Natural park “Bystrinsky”)] . Yaroslavl, Russia: Cadaster Institute, 156. (In Russ.)
General Assembly. (2015). Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . New York: United Nations, 35. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
Georgeson, L., Maslin, M., & Poessinouw, M. (2017). The global green economy: a review of concepts, definitions, measurement methodologies and their interactions. Geo: Geography and Environment, 4 (1), e00036. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.36
Karaganov, S. A. (Ed.) (2021). Povorot k prirode: novaya ekologicheskaya politika Rossii v usloviyakh “zelenoy” transformatsii mirovoy ekonomiki i politiki: doklad po itogam serii situatsionnykh analizov [Turning to Nature: Russia’s New Environmental Policy in “Green” Transformation of the Global Economy and Politics: Report based on the results of situational analyses series] . Moscow: International relations, 97. (In Russ.)
Minakir, P. A. (2019). ‘Program’ Economy: The Far East. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 15 (2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.2.007-016 (In Russ.)
Minakir, P. A., & Prokapalo, O. M. (2017). Economy of the Far East of Russia: State and Prospects. Regionalistika [Regionalistics], 4 (3), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.14530/reg.2017.3 (In Russ.)
Mirzekhanova, Z. G. & Koltsova, A. A. (2022). National Strategic Goals in the Environmental Programs of the Far Eastern Regions. Tikhookeanskaya geografiya [Pacific Geography], 3 (11), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.35735/26870509_2022_11_1 (In Russ.)
Mirzekhanova, Z. G. (2020). Implementing the Green Economy Concepts in the Russian Far East: Environmental Preconditions. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 16 (2), 449-463. http://doi.org/10.17059/2020-2-9 (In Russ.)
Mirzekhanova, Z. G. (2021). Regional Environmental Programs: Problems of Implementation. Geography and Natural Resources, 42 (2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1875372821020098
Nazarenko, A. E., & Krasnoyarova, B. A. (2018). Cost evaluation of ecosystem services for carbon sequestration by Altai krai ecosystems as a component of transition to sustainable development. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov [Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of regions], 4 ((14)3), 89-99. (In Russ.)
OECD. (2012). Environmental Outlook to 2050: Consequences of Inaction. OESD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264122246-en
OECD. (2017). Green Growth Indicators 2017 . OECD Green Growth Studies, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268586-en
OECD. (2019). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences . OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307452-en
Potravny, I. M., Yashalova, N. N., Gassiy, V. V., & Chávez Ferreyra, K. Y. (2019). The Project Approach for Managing the Environmentally Oriented Development of the Regional Economy. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 15 (3), 806–821. https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-14 (In Russ.)
Shkiperova, G. T. (2016). Environmental policy as a mechanism to correlate interests of economic development and economic security. Natsionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 12 (6), 97-110.
Shkiperova, G. T., & Druzhinin, P. V. (2018). Evaluating the efficiency of the environmental security policy in the Russian regions. Natsionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 14 (12), 2356–2372. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.14.12.2356 (In Russ.)
Tulyakova, I. V. (2017). Evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs. Problems and prospects. Finkontrol [Financial control], 4 . http://rufincontrol.ru/article/332551 (In Russ.)
Turtseva, Ch. P. (2022). Vectors of the Russian Regional Environmental Policy Design: State Programs Analysis. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science], 16 (3), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-3-27-40 (In Russ.)
Yashalova, N. N. (2014). Development of green economy indicators at the regional level. Natsionalnye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 10 (40), 26-34. (In Russ.)
Yurak, V. V., Ignatyeva, M. N., & Polyanskaya, I. G. (2021). Evaluation Theory in Environmental Economics: Territorial Aspect. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions], 17 (4), 1059-1078. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-2 (In Russ.)
Zavadskaya, A. V., Nikolaeva, E. A., Sazhin, V. A., Shpilenok, T. I., & Shuvalova, O. A. (2017). Ekonomicheskaya otsenka prirodnykh resursov i ekosistem uslug Kronotskogo zapovednika i Yuzhno-Kamchatskogo zakaznika [Values and Ecosystem Services of Kronotsky Reserve and South Kamchatka Sanctuary] . Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: Kamchatpress, 244. (In Russ.)
Zomonova, E. M. (2015). Strategiya perekhoda k «zelenoy» ekonomike: opyt i metody izmereniya [Strategy for the transition to a green economy: experience and measurement methods: an analytical overview] . Novosibirsk: State Public Scientific and Technical Library SB RAS, 283. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zoya G. Mirzekhanova , Anastasiya A. Koltsova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

