Assessing the Adaptation of the Population of Russian Regions to Digital Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-21Abstract
Currently, digitalisation of public life is one of the most important external challenges that requires active adaptation of the population to new realities. Russia has been quite successfully implementing digital technologies, ranking in the middle of various world ratings. However, Russian regions significantly differ in terms of the population adaptation to digital technologies. We hypothesise that adaptation speed depends on demographic characteristics of the regional population. In this regard, the paper aims to develop a methodology and tools for assessing the adaptation of the population of Russian regions to digital technologies. The study employs data of a sample observation on the state of the information society in 2014–2020 obtained from the Federal State Statistics Service. Methods of statistical, cartographic, factor and regression analysis, as well as the econometric estimates conducted in the R software environment were used. Constructed econometric models show that gender and place of residence (urban or rural settlement) are the most important adaptation factors in Russian regions. In particular, urban women more actively use the Internet for shopping, while urban women and rural men use it to receive public services. Active acquisition of digital competencies by the population reduces the importance of some barrier factors (restrictions), such as the cost of connection (Internet connection becomes a basic need) and the lack of skills. While the identified effects differ in magnitude, they are significant for almost all Russian regions. The developed research methodology can be applied in future studies to analyse other aspects of social and economic adaptation of the regional population to current challenges. The findings can be used for justifying and implementing the public policy measures, in particular, the national project “Digital Economy”.
References
Balakrishnan, V. & Shuib, N. L. M. (2021). Drivers and inhibitors for digital payment adoption using the Cashless Society Readiness-Adoption model in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 65, 101554. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101554.
Banhidi, Z., Dobos, I. & Nemeslaki, A. (2020). What the overall Digital Economy and Society Index reveals: A statistical analysis of the DESI EU28 dimensions. Regional Statistics, 10(2), 42-62. DOI: 10.15196/RS100209.
Bekbergeneva, D. E. (2021). Examining the Digital Mentality of Regional Population. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and management], 27(8), 603-611. DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-8-603-611 (In Russ.)
Cazacu, M., Titan, E., Manea, D. & Mihai, M. (2021). Offensive Strategy Approach of Aging Population in the Context of a Digital Society. Romanian Statistical Review, 3, 37-46.
Choy, B. G. (2020). Random Interaction Effect of Digital Transformation on General Price Level and Economic Growth. Foresight and STI Governance, 14(1), 29-47. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.1.29.47.
Doroshenko, S. V. & Trushkova, E. A. (2019). A Macromodel of Population Adaptation in Changing Economic Conditions: Approaches and Solutions. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(4), 617-629. DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.2 (In Russ.)
Egard, H. & Hansson, K. (2021). The digital society comes sneaking in. An emerging field and its disabling barriers. Disability & Society. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2021.1960275.
Elliott, K., Price, R., Shaw, P., Spiliotopoulos, T., Ng, M., Coopamootoo, K. & van Moorsel, A. (2021). Towards an Equitable Digital Society: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Corporate Digital Responsibility (CDR). Society, 58(3), 179-188. DOI: 10.1007/s12115-021-00594-8.
Fossen, F. & Sorgner, A. (2019). Mapping the Future of Occupations: Transformative and Destructive Effects of New Digital Technologies on Jobs. Foresight and STI Governance, 13(2), 10-18. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.10.18.
Galllego Trijueque, S. & Vinader-Segura, R. (2019). Digital social capital: digital tools as amplifiers of civil society. Barataria-Revista Castellano-Manchega De Ciencias Sociales, 26, 31-48. DOI: 10.20932/barataria.v0i26.458.
Hantrais, L. & Lenihan, A. T. (2021). Social dimensions of evidence-based policy in a digital society. Contemporary Social Science, 16(2), 141-155. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2021.1887508.
Irkhin, Yu. V. (2020). Classical and digital approaches in public administration: New trends in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ars Administrandi, 12(3), 367-384. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2020-3-367-384. (In Russ.)
Kalmus, V. & Opermann, Si. (2020). Personal time capital in the digital society: an alternative look at social stratification among three generations of highly skilled professionals in Estonia. Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 24(1), 3-25. DOI:10.3176/tr.2020.1.01.
Kashyap, R., Fatehkia, M., Al Tamime, R. & Weber, I. (2020). Monitoring global digital gender inequality using the online populations of Facebook and Google. Demographic Research, 43, 779-816. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.27.
Kozlova, O. A. & Makarova, M. N. (2020). Reducing household resource inequality under digitalization of the economy: Issue statement. Ars Administrandi, 12(3), 527-540. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2020-3-527-540. (In Russ.)
Kuchmaeva, O. V. & Arkhipova, M. Yu. (2021). Digital Technologies in Everyday Life of the Russians. Voprosy statistiki, 28(3), 45-55. DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-3-45-55. (In Russ.)
Lanshina, T. A., Barinova, V. A., Kondratiev, A. D. & Romantsov, M. V. (2020). Sustainable Development and Digitalization: The Unusual COVID-19 Crisis Requires Original Solutions. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy [International Organisations Research Journal], 15(4), 91-114. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-05. (In Russ.)
Lapidus, L. V., Sorokina, L. A. & Gostilovich, A. O. (2020). Generation Z awareness of digital transformation technologies under a technological shift. Ars Administrandi, 12(4), 618-638. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2020-4-618-638. (In Russ.)
Lee, R. L. M. (2021). Collectivity, connectivity and control: reframing mass society in the digital era. International Review of Sociology-Revue Internationale De Sociologie, 31 (Special Issue), 204-221. DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2021.1913546.
Pedersen, J. S. & Wilkinson, A. (2018). The digital society and provision of welfare services. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(3-4), 194-209. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-05-2017-0062.
Polak, P. (2021). Welcome to the Digital Era-the Impact of AI on Business and Society. Society, 58(3), 177-178. DOI:10.1007/s12115-021-00588-6.
Rovinskaya, T. (2021). The role of new digital technologies in a time of crisis. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 65(6), 95-106. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-6-95-106. (In Russ.)
Sahanenko, S., Popov, M., Holynska, O., Kolisnichenko, N., Davtian, S. & Motyhin, D. (2021). Digital Tools of Territorial Communities in Improving the Quality of Services to the Population. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 39(7), e5007. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i7.5007.
Sharifyanov, T. F. & Gainanov, D. A. (2016). A model to bridge the digital divide in small remote locations through public-private partnership. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Teoriya i praktika [Regional economics: theory and practice], 8, 19-32. (In Russ.)
Sharikov, A. (2016). Digital literacy: a four-component model. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 14(1), 87-98. (In Russ.)
Simeao, L. Q., Goncalves, C. D. & Clara, A. (2020). Digital civil liability: the information society and the limits of freedom of expression within social networks. Humanidades & Inovacao, 7(19), 245-257.
Skvortsova, E. E. (2021). The relationship between digitalization and quality of life: measurement and interpretation. Narodonaselenie [Population], 24(2), 66-75. DOI: 10.19181/population.2021.24.2.6. (In Russ.)
Smirnykh, L. I. (2020). Digital literacy of the elderly population and digitalization of enterprises: Experience of European countries. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 104-124. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-12-104-124 (In Russ.)
Stoica, M., Ghilic-Micu, B. & Mircea, M. (2021). The telework paradigm in the IoE ecosystem — a model for the teleworker residence choice in context of digital economy and society. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 55(3), 263-278. DOI:10.24818/18423264/55.3.21.17.
Subramaniam, Y., Masron, T. A., Hadiya, N. & Hassan, S. H. (2020). The digital divide in developing countries. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy [International Organisations Research Journal], 15(4), 115-139. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-06. (In Russ.)
Veselov, Yu. V. & Skvortsov, N. G. (2021). Trust in the Age of Digital Transformations: a Sociological Study. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 6, 57-68. DOI: 10.31857/5013216250012556-4. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Economy of Regions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

