Design Model for the Development of Agrarian Economy: Food Aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-23Keywords:
agrarian policy, agroindustry, food independence, import substitution, agricultural production, state support, budgetary appropriations, strategic planning, forecasting, project managementAbstract
Based on the assessment of the agrarian economy development and generalization of the main directions of scientific thought, the article shows that in the last decade, the activation of agrarian policy has promoted positive shifts only in the certain directions. These shifts are not connected with a decrease in import dependence in the main food commodities. This has resulted in a low level of food self-sufficiency, seed and breeding raw materials for food production. On the example of Penza region, the authors reveal the main reasons of the low effectiveness of state measures, note their redistribution in favour of the large-scale enterprises, which cannot alone solve the import substitution problem. Using econometric methods and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) method, we have proved that the current state support mechanism is not connected with the extension of the food programme, and the subsidizing does not stimulate producers to increase the output of production. The method of statistical distribution allowed us to conclude that the problem consists in the current format of state regulation, which is implemented through financial instruments of monetary and credit institutes. Moreover, due to the low parameters of solvency and a lack of mortgage base of the most of the enterprises, it obviously deprives them of borrowed funds and budgetary provisions. On this basis, the authors draw the conclusion that a considerable part of agrarian resources in the region is not involved in the solution of food problems. We emphasize that the project management of agrarian production can become the main driver, allowing to the majority of producers to get the access to the attracted and budgetary resources. Moreover, as the received empirical model shows, the effectiveness of the operating support measures increases. The research on the basis of the theory of marginal efficiency of expenses has shown the considerable opportunities of increase in relative to a rouble of additional investments in the organizations with low financial performance providing corresponding conditions. The results of the research will be used for the development of the offers for the modernization of methods and models in strategic planning and forecasting of the development of agroindustry.References
Tarasov, V. I., Ivoylova, I. V. & Osinina, A. Yu. (2017). O strategicheskikh prognozakh i strategiyakh razvitiya agropromyshlennykh kompleksov gosudarstv EAES i regionalnykh integratsionnykh formirovaniy do 2030 goda [About strategic forecasts and development strategies of agro-industrial complexes of the states of EEU and regional integration forming till 2030]. Sovremennyye tendentsii razvitiya nauki i tekhnologiy [Current trends of development of science and technologies], 1–4, 134–137. (In Russ.)
Aganbegyan, A. G. & Porfiryev, B. N. (2015). Zameshchenie importa prodovolstviya i razvitie “zelenoy” agroekonomiki kak strategicheskie otvety na antirossiyskie sektoralnyye sanktsii [Replacement of Food Import and Development of ‘Green’ Agro-Economy as Strategic Answers to Antirussian Sectoral Sanctions]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of Agricultural and Processing Anterprises], 2, 16–27. (In Russ.)
Miloserdov, V. (2014). Sanktsii, embargo prodovolstviya, importozameshchenie [Sanctions, embargo of the food, import substitution]. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii [Economics of Agriculture of Russia], 11, 13–20. (In Russ.)
Altukhov, A. I., Drokin, V. V. & Zhuravlev, A. S. (2015). Prodovolstvennaya bezopasnost i importozameshchenie — osnovnyye strategicheskie zadachi sovremennoy agrarnoy politiki [Food Supply Security and Import Substitution as the Key Strategic Objectives of the Modern Agricultural Policy]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 3, 256–266. doi: 10.17059/2015–3–21. (In Russ.)
Samygin, D., Baryshnikov, N. & Shlapakova, N. (2015). Models of investment appeal of agribusiness in russian regions. J. Ponte, 73(2), 344–351. doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.2.29.
Bespakhotny, G. V. (2015). Zadachi gosudarstvennogo planirovaniya APK i metody ikh resheniya [Problems of state planning of agrarian and industrial complex and methods of their decision]. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii [Agrarian economics of Russia], 5, 2–7. (In Russ.)
Uzun, V. (2012). Rossiyskaya politika podderzhki selskogo khozyaystva i neobkhodimost ee korrektirovki posle vstupleniya v VTO [The Russian policy for the support of agriculture and the need of its adjustment after accession to WTO]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 10, 132–149. (In Russ.)
Buzdalov, I. N. (2016). Nauchnyye osnovy i sovremennaya strategiya agrarnoy politiki v Rossii [Scientific bases and modern strategy of agrarian policy in Russia]. APK. Ekonomika, upravlenie [AIC: Economy, management], 3, 8–21. (In Russ.)
Ushachev, I. G. (2016). Strategicheskie napravleniya ustoychivogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii [Strategic directions for sustainable development of the agroindustrial complex of Russia]. APK. Ekonomika, upravlenie [AIC: Economy, management], 11, 4–15. (In Russ.)
Bespakhotnyy, G. V. (2016). Finansirovanie gosudarstvennykh programm po importozameshcheniyu v selskom khozyaystve [Financing the State Programs on Import Substitution in Agriculture]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 1, 19–22. (In Russ.)
Buzdalov, I. (2016). O fundamentalnykh osnovakh agrarnoy politiki [On fundamental basis agricultural policy]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and economy], 5, 46–61. (In Russ.)
Karkh, D. A., Gayanova, V. M. & Aymel, F. (2015). Prioritetnyye napravleniya povysheniya effektivnosti regionalnogo prodovolstvennogo kompleksa [Priority Directions of the Regional Food Complex Effectiveness Increase]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 2, 260–271. doi 10.17059/2015–2–21. (In Russ.)
Tatarkin, A. I. (2014). Dialektika gosudarstvennogo i rynochnogo regulirovaniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov i munitsipalitetov [Dialectics of public and market regulation of a region and municipality socio-economic development]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 1(37), 9–33. (In Russ.)
Bespakhotnyy, G. V., Baryshnikov, N. G., Kapitonov, A. A. et al. (2006). Metodika planirovaniya byudzhetnykh subsidiy dlya selskokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva [Techniques for the planning of the budgetary subsidies for agricultural production]. Ekaterinburg: UrGSKhA Publ., 49. (In Russ.)
Borkhunov, N. A., Zaruk, N. F., Maslova V. V. et al. (2006). Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po opredeleniyu ukrupnennykh normativov byudzhetnogo finansirovaniya selskogo khozyaystva na federalnom i regionalnom urovnyakh [Methodical recommendations on the definition of the integrated standards of the budgetary financing of agriculture at the federal and regional levels]. Moscow: VNIIESKh Publ., 34. (In Russ.)
Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 1, 79–93.
Gummesson, E. (2005). Qualitative research in marketing Road-map for a wilderness of complexity and unpredictability. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3–4), 309–327.
Davis, Ellery W. (1981). Review: Calcul des Probabilités, par J. Bertrand. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1(1), 16–25. doi:10.1090/s0002–9904–1891–00020–6.
Chamberlin, E. H. (1948). Proportionality, Divisibility and Economics of Scale. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62(2), 229–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1883221.
Krutova, I. N. (2010). Formirovanie i razvitie sistemy proektnogo finansirovaniya predpriyatiy APK. Teoriya, metodologiya, praktika [Formation and development of system for a project financing of the agro-industrial enterprises: theory, methodology, practice]. Saransk: Mordov. un-t Publ., 240. (In Russ.)
Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2015). Towards a Developmental Turn in Evolutionary Economic Geography? Regional Studies, 49(5), 712–732, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.899431.
Gataullin, R. F., Askarov, A. A., Khuzhakhmetova, G. N. & Yarkov, N. V. (2015). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskie formy i effektivnyye metody gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya selskogo khozyaystva [Organizational and Economic Forms and Effective Methods of State Regulation of Agriculture]. (In Russ.) Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2, 271–284. doi 10.17059/2015–2–22.
Moon, R. W. (1976). Business mergers and take-over bids. London: Gee&Co (publishers) Ltd., fifth edition, 268.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 761.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Denis Yuryevich Samygin, Nikolaj Georgievich Baryshnikov, Ljudmila Alekseevna Mizjurkina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
