Criteria, Probability and Degree of Instability of Employment Taking into Account the Features of the Russian Labour Market

Authors

  • Vyacheslav Nikolaevich Bobkov Russian Center of Living Standards; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
  • Vadim Grigoryevich Kvachev Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
  • Natalya Viktorovna Loktyukhina Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
  • Marco Ricceri Istituto Europeo di Studi Politici|Economici e Sociali - EURISPES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-3

Keywords:

precarization, precarious employment, criteria of precarious employment, informal employment, employment types, work status, precarious employment degree, expert survey, labour contract term, nature of labour relations, precarious terms of work

Abstract

The article reveals the issues of the global character of precarization and substantiates the criteria of precarious employment taking into account its special aspects in Russian Federation. The existing variability of approaches to the definition of precarious employment and the necessity to elaborate its optimal criteria in view of features of national labour have conditioned the relevance of the research. The paper involves international and Russian research on precarity and significantly uses the results of expert survey conducted by the authors in autumn 2016. The experts have considered groups of criteria based on: labour contract term, nature of labour relations, precarious terms of work. The experts also were asked to evaluate different forms of employment in which precarity may exert. As a result of the conducted research, we have elaborated the generalized criteria, which identify various forms of instability in labour market. The authors put forward a hypothesis that the criteria of the International Labour Organization (ILO) need to be adapted to the Russian realities when determining unstable employment, and the phenomenon of precarious employment has to be defined from the point of view of the probabilistic nature of its various manifestations. Based on the results of the research, the authors have qualified the relevance of International Labour Organization's (ILO) criteria in the Russian context. We also have substantiated the probable character of precarious employment and defined probability of precarity exertion in the flexible forms of employment. The set of precarious employment criteria is specified in accordance with Russian context: we have clarified and complemented them, and defined the probability of precarity exertion in different forms of employment. The main result of the research is the structure of criterial standards, which identifies precarious employment. The conceptual issues and findings of the paper can be used as a theoretical and methodological basis to identify the scale of precarious employment in Russia as well as to evaluate precarity exertion in individual workplace.

Author Biographies

Vyacheslav Nikolaevich Bobkov, Russian Center of Living Standards; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Director General, All-Russian Center of Living Standards; Chief Research Associate, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; Scopus Author ID 55960509800 (29, 4th Parkovaya St., Moscow, 105043; 36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 115093, Russian Federation; e-mail: bobkovvn@mail.ru).

Vadim Grigoryevich Kvachev, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

PhD of Sociology, Senior Lecturer, Department of Management of Human Resources, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 115093, Russian Federation; e-mail: kvachevvg@mail.ru).

Natalya Viktorovna Loktyukhina, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 115093, Russian Federation; e-mail: loktn@mail.ru).

Marco Ricceri, Istituto Europeo di Studi Politici|Economici e Sociali - EURISPES

Head of the Istituto Europeo di Studi Politici, Economici e Sociali — EURISPES (14, Via Cagliari, Rome, 00198, Italy; e-mail: riccerimarco@hotmail.com).

References

Bizyukov, P. V. (2013). Praktiki regulirovaniya trudovykh otnosheniy v usloviyakh neustoychivoy zanyatosti [Practice of labour regulation in the conditions of unstable employment]. Moscow: ANO Tsentr sotsialno-trudovykh prav Publ., 152. (In Russ.)

Bobkov, V. N., Chernykh, E. A., Aliev, U. T. & Kurilchenko, E. I. (2011). Neustoychivost zanyatosti. Negativnyye storony sovremennykh sotsialno-trudovykh otnosheniy [Instability of employment. Negative sides of the modern social and labour relations]. Uroven zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards in the Regions of Russia], 5, 13–26. (In Russ.)

Noosferizm — novyy put razvitiya: kollektivnaya monografiya [Noospherism– a new way of development: a collective monograph]. In 2 books. In: G. M. Imamova, A. A. Gorbunova (Eds). St. Peterburg: Asterion Publ., 920. (In Russ.)

Veredyuk, O. V. (2013). Neustoychivost zanyatosti. Teoreticheskie osnovy i otsenka masshtabov v Rossii [Instability of Employment: Theoretical Concept and Assessment of its Scale in Russia]. Vestnik SpbGU [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University], 1, 25–32. (5. Ekonomika). (In Russ.)

Gimpelson, V. & Kapelyushnikov, R. (2005). Nestandartnaya zanyatost i rossiyskiy rynok truda [Non-standard employment and Russian labour market]. Preprint WP3/2005/05. Moscow: GU VShE Publ., 36. (In Russ.)

Bobkov, V. N., Veredyuk, O. V., Kolosova, R. P. & Razumova, T. O. (2014). Zanyatost i sotsialnaya prekarizatsiya v Rossii. Vvedenie v analiz [Employment and social precarization in Russia. Introduction to the analysis]. Moscow: TEIS Publ., 96. (In Russ.)

Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2005). Zanyatost v domashnikh khozyaystvakh naseleniya [Employment in population households]. Preprint WP3/2005/01. Moscow: GU VShE Publ., 60. (In Russ.)

Lyapin, A., Noynkheffer, G., Shershukova, L. & Bizyukov, P. (2007). Ekonomicheskaya perspektiva dlya rabotnikov. Neustoychivaya zanyatost i ee posledstviya dlya rabotnikov [Economic prospect for workers. Unstable employment and its consequences for workers]. Moscow: Tsentr sotsialno-trudovykh prav Publ., 48. (In Russ.)

Matveeva, T. A. (2014). Vliyanie neustoychivosti zanyatosti na trudovyye dokhody rossiyskikh rabotnikov i na ikh udovletvorennost trudom [Influence of instability of employment on labour income of Russian workers and their job satisfaction]. Uroven zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards in the Regions of Russia], 3, 56–68. (In Russ.)

Ricceri, M. (2015). Sotsialnaya prekarizatsiya i ustoychivoye razvitie: razmyshleniya na temu opasnykh protivorechiy [Social precarity and sustainable growth: reflections on a dangerous contradiction]. Uroven zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standards in the Regions of Russia], 3(1), 3–37. (In Russ.)

Sinyavskaya, O. V. (2005). Neformalnaya zanyatost v sovremennoy Rossii. Izmerenie, masshtaby, dinamika [Informal employment in modern Russia. Measurement, scales, dynamics]. Moscow: Pomatur Publ., 55. (In Russ.)

Bobkov, V., Csoba, J. & Herrmann, P. (Eds.). (2014). Labour Market and Precarity of Employment: Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Data from Hungary and Russia. Bremen: Wiener Verlag fuer Sozialforschung, 264.

Bobkov, V. N., Veredyuk, O. V. & Alijev, U. (2013). Risks of Society Stability and Precarity of Employment: A Look at Russia. International Journal on Social Quality, 3(1), 241–258.

Hepp, R.-D. (2012). Prekarisierung und Flexibilisierung (Precarity and Flexibilisation). Westfalisches dampfboot, 386.

Herrmann, P. & Kalaycioglu, S. (Eds). (2011). Precarity — More than a Challenge of Social Security Or: Cynicism of EU’s Concept of Economic Freedom. Bremen: Europäisher Hochschulverlag GmbH & Co. KG, 187.

Lee, Ch. K. & Kofman, Ye. (2012). The Politics of Precarity: Views Beyond the United States. Work and Occupations, 39(4), 388–408. DOI: 10.1177/0730888412446710.

17. Lehtonen, M. (2004). Social Interface of sustainable Development: Capabilities, Social Capital, Institutions. Ecological Economics, 9, 199–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.019.

Meadows, H. W., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens, III W.W. (1972). The limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicaments of Mankind. New York Universe, 205.

Rifkin, J. (1995). The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. Putnam Publishing Group, 400.

20. Bodei, R. (2010). Pensare il futuro, o dell’incertezza globale. Lettera Internazionale, 106, 3–10.

Senneth, R. (1999). The Culture of the New Capitalism. Milano: Ed. Feltrinelli, 214.

Stiglitz, J. E. & Sen, A. (2009). Fitoussi. J-P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris, 291.

Viola, F. (2008). The Existencial Precarious as a Social Identity: an Ideological Operation. Proteo. Retrieved from: http://www.proteo.rdbcub.it/article.php3?id_article=643 (date of access: 15.03.2017).

Vives, A., Amable, M., Ferrer, M. et al. (2010). The Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES): psychometric properties of a new tool for epidemiological studies among waged and salaried workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 67(8), 548–555. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2009.048967.

Vives, A. (2010). A multidimensional approach to precarious employment: measurement, association with poor mental health and prevalence in the Spanish workforce. Barcelona: Dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2010. — 341 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3777.4568.

Watta, L. (2008). Job quality in Europe. ETUI. Retrieved from: http://www.etui.org/Publications2/Working-Papers/Job-quality-in-Europe (date of access: 15.03.2017).

Downloads

Published

18.09.2017

How to Cite

Bobkov, V. N., Kvachev, V. G., Loktyukhina, N. V., & Ricceri, M. (2017). Criteria, Probability and Degree of Instability of Employment Taking into Account the Features of the Russian Labour Market. Economy of Regions, 13(3), 672–683. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-3-3

Issue

Section

Research articles