Management of the Structural Transformation of Regional Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-4Keywords:
structure of the economy, integration of the economy, regional structural policy, social economy, evaluation model of structural shift, optimization approach, input-output balance, dual assessment, regional separatism, competitiveness of the economyAbstract
The article presents the research of the structural transformation of the economy. The authors have formulated the theoretical concept and the basic reasons for structural transformation of the economy in regions. According to the authors’ approach, the economy should function as a whole system. This defining principle is aimed at the systemic effect. The loss of regions’ control, and, in some cases, deviation from the national goals are the main reasons for the reduction in the Russian economic efficiency. As a result of the liberalization of the economy, the principle of selective investments has become the dominant one as a result of the liberalization of the economy. It broke the synergetic principle used for the formulation of economic strategy. The authors recommend to structure an efficient economy on the basis of the specificity of the economic situation due to its internal state and international realities. We also advise to achieve the balance between regional development and the development of country’s economic competitiveness. The article substantiates the need to overcome the growth of negative trends. These trends are due to the deformation of the most important economic principles and relationships as a result of weakness in the structural and investment policy. Thus, the high-priority task is the orientation of economic development to ensure the technical and technological independence of the economic system. This strategy contains the determining directions for the next development stages. We propose to focus the modernization of the structure of regional economy on the combination of the conceptual foundations of the federal structural policy and regional conditions for its implementation. Regional economy should balance economic initiative and independence in terms of the methods and means for its implementation. We recommend to combine the economic growth with the regional environmental management and the regulation of the natural environment. The authors propose a mathematical model for the management and evaluation of structural shift in economic systems as well as the regional evaluation model of structural shift. We also offer an optimization approach in management improving the economic structure to ensure an effective balance of its components.References
Galbraith, J. K. (1973). Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 334.
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N. Y.: Basic Books, 507.
Kornai, J. (1998). The System Paradigm — William Davidson institute Working Papers Series 278. William Davidson institute at the University of Michigan, 1998. — 26 p.
Gubanov, S. S. (2010). Put razvitiya Rossii. Nazrevsheye utochnenie [The way of development of Russia: urgent clarification]. Ekonomist [Economist], 4, 3–5. (In Russ.)
Amosov, A. (2010). Razmyshleniya ob ideologii razvitiya [Reflections on the ideology of development]. Ekonomist [Economist], 7, 20–27. (In Russ.)
Krylov, O. V. (2000). Ogranichennost resursov kak prichina predstoyashchego krizisa [Limited resources as the cause of the forthcoming crisis]. Vestnik RAN [Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 70(2), 136–146. (In Russ.)
Terentyev, D. (2015). Chem bogaty rossiyskie nedra [The rich Russian subsoil]. Argumenty nedeli [Arguments of the week], 45. (In Russ.)
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2011). O strategii razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii [Development Strategy of the Russian Economy]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economics of Contemporary Russia], 3, 7–31. (In Russ.)
Garipov, F. N. & Garipova, Z. F. (2017). Resursnyye problemy ekonomicheskogo razvitiya na sovremennom etape [Resource problems of economic development at the present stage]. Ufa: Mir pechati Publ., 111. (In Russ.)
Lvov, D. S. (1997). O sushchestve ekonomicheskikh reform [The essence of economic reforms]. Regionalnaya strategiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Mezhregionalnaya NPK. Ekaterinburg [Regional strategy for socio-economic development. Interregional CDD. Ekaterinburg], 1, 3–23. (In Russ.)
Gizatullin, Kh. N. (1997). Regionalnaya politika i strategiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh preobrazovaniy [Regional policy and strategy for socio-economic transformation]. Ufa: VEGU Publ., 91. (In Russ.)
Sachs, J. D. & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER Working Paper, 5398. Retrieved from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w5398.pdf. (date of access: 01.09.2017).
Corden, W. M. & Neary, P. J. (1982). Booming sectors and deindustrialization in small open economy. The Economic Journal, 92, 825–848.
Kachalov, R. M. & Yakovleva, N. V. (2014). Kompleksnyy podkhod k analizu kachestva upravleniya sotsialno-ekonomicheskim razvitiem regiona [Integrated Approach To The Analysis Of The Quality Of Socio-Economic Regional Development Governance]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 4, 131–137. (In Russ.)
Ulrich, P. (2008). Integrative economic ethics. Foundations of a civilized market economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 484.
Kleiner, G. B. (2011). Sistemnyy resurs ekonomika [Economy as a system resource]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 1, 89–100. (In Russ.)
Gizatullin, Kh. N. & Garipov, F. N. (2014). Sintez modeley V. Leontyeva i L. Kantorovicha dlya upravleniya strukturnymi preobrazovaniyami v ekonomike [Synthesis of Models of V. Leontief and L. Kantorovich for Managing the Structural Changes in the Economy]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of Economics Theory], 2, 21–28. (In Russ.)
Takumbetov, M. I. & Sultanov, M. K. (1985). Effektivnost proizvodstva i prirosta selkhozproduktov v kolkhozakh po zonam Bashkirskoy ASSR [Efficiency of production and the growth of agricultural products in collective farms in the zones of the Bashkir ASSR]. Razvitie mezhkhozyaystvennykh i vnutrikhozyaystvennykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy v selskom khozyaystve [Development of inter-economic and intra-economic relations in agriculture], 119–136. (In Russ.)
Bellman, R. & Dreyfus, S. (1965). Prikladnyye zadachi dinamicheskogo programmirovaniya: per. s angl. [Applied dynamic programming: trans. from English]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 460. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 K.N. Gizatullin, F.N. Garipov, Z.F. Garipova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
