Threats to the Human Capacity of Regional Higher Education Institutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-8

Keywords:

strategy of scientific and technological development, higher education, framework of modernization, threat to the human capital, per capita funding, priorities of scientific activity, decrease in patent activity, portfolio of patents, income from results of intellectual activity, stimulation of innovative development of higher education institutions

Abstract

In recent years, the sphere of science and education in Russia undergoes significant reforms. However, the existing framework guiding the development of the higher education contradict the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of Russia. Wiese contradictions concern the conditions for building an integral system of personnel reserve and recruitment, which is necessary for the scientific and technological development of the country. We change of the funding model and the transition to two-tier higher education contribute to the outflow of talented youth to the cities where branded universities are concentrated. It creates threats to the human capacity of regional higher education institutions (both regarding staffing number, and regarding personnel reserve). Decreasing trend in number of students because of the federal budget appropriation and the existing system of per capita funding for regional higher education institutions are the threats for regional higher education. These threats can result in permanent reduction of the number of academic teaching staff and in potential decline in quality of education due to increasing teachers' workloads. The transition to the two-tier model of university education has changed the approach to evaluating the efficiency of scientific research. The number of publications in the journals, which are indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus, has increased, but the patent activity of the leading higher education institutions has decreased many times. The ratio of number of articles to the number of the granted patents in the leading Russian universities significantly exceeds a similar indicator of the leading foreign universities. It can be regarded as «brain drain». Furthermore, this fact explains why the specific weight of income from the results of intellectual activity in total income in the majority of the Russian universities is close to zero. Regional higher education institutions need a strategy of innovative development. This strategy assumes the change in the system of financing of higher education and the evaluation of the efficiency of scientific activity to stimulate the creation of disruptive social and technological innovations. Further research can be devoted to the identification of the agents of influence on education and science and the development of a methodology for the assessment of damage from their activity.

Author Biography

Evgeny Valentinovich Romanov, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University

Doctor of Education, Professor, Department of Management, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0071-1462; Researcher ID: E-4543–2017 (24, Lenina Ave., Magnitogorsk, 455000, Russian Federation; e-mail: menedgment73@mail.ru).

References

Kurbatova, M. P. & Kagan, E. S. (2015). Otsenka stepeni znachimosti effektov vneshnego kontrolya deyatelnosti prepodavateley vuzov [Significance assessment of the external control effects of lecturers]. Zhurnal institutsionalnykh issledovaniy [Journal of Institutional Studies], 7(3), 122–143. doi: 10.17835/2076–6297.2015.7.3.122–143. (In Russ.)

McPherson, M. S. & Schapiro, M. O. (1999). Tenure issues in higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 85–98.

Tarasevich, Yu. Yu. & Shinyaeva, T. S. (2015). Kriterii sostoyaniya i razvitiya nauchnykh issledovaniy na osnove analiza naukometricheskoy informatsii [Criteria for Assessment of Current Condition and Development of Research Studies Based on Scientometric Data Analysis]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2, 221–234. doi: 10.17323/1814–9545–2015–2-221–234. (In Russ.)

Volchik, V. V. & Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, D. D. (2015). Instituty, tekhnologii i vozrastayushchaya otdacha [Institutions, technologies and increasing returns]. Zhurnal institutsionalnykh issledovaniy [Journal of Institutional Studies], 7(1), 45–58. DOI: 10.17835/2076–6297.2015.7.1.045–058. (In Russ.)

Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. In: Flood R. & Gill R. (Eds). London, 21. Retrieved from: http://diafaneia.ee.auth.gr/sites/default/files/silence.pdf (date of access: 20.03.2017).

Head, S. (2011, January 13). The Grim Threat to British Universities. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jan/13/grim-threat-british-universities/ (date of access: 20.03.2017).

Baggaley, R. (2007, May 25). How the RAE is Smothering “big idea” books”. Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/how-the-rae-is-smothering-big-idea-books/209113.article?sectioncode=26&storycode=209113 (date of access: 20.03.2017).

Schuster, J. & Finkelstein, M. (2008). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Johns Hopkins University Press, 600.

Volkov, A., Livanov, D. & Fursenko, A. (2007). Vyssheye obrazovanie. Povestka 2008–2016 [The higher education: agenda of 2008–2016]. Innovatsionnoye obrazovanie i ekonomika [Innovation education and economic], 12(1), 8–12. (In Russ.)

Romanov, E. V. (2016). Metodologiya i teoriya innovatsionnogo razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii [Methodology and the theory of innovative development of the higher education in Russia]. Moscow: Infra-M Publ., 302. (Scientific thought). doi: 10.12737/17756. (In Russ.)

Romanov, E. V. (2015). Finansirovanie vuzov v tselyakh stimulirovaniya innovatsionnogo razvitiya. Podkhody i mekhanizmy [Financing of higher education institutions for stimulation of innovative development: approaches and mechanisms]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 4(98), 87–105. (In Russ.)

Winston, G. (1999). Subsidies, Hierarchies and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13‐36.

Khili, P. (2004). Vuzy. Bitva za professuru [Higher education institutions: fight for professorate]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 4, 89–101. (In Russ.)

Kurbatova, M. V. (2013). Effektivnyy kontrakt v vuze. Ot teoreticheskoy kontseptsii k realnomu izmeneniyu polozheniya prepodavatelya [The effective contract in higher education institution: from the theoretical concept to real change of position of the teacher]. Nauchnyye trudy Donetskogo natsionalnogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Scientific works of the Donetsk national technical university], 3(45), 41–50. (Series: Economics). (In Russ.)

Savitskaya, E. V. & Altunina, N. S. (2017). Vyssheye obrazovanie. Reputatsionnye effekty, signalnyye iskazheniya i blagopriyatnyy otbor [Higher education: reputational effects, distorted signaling and propitious selection]. Zhurnal institutsionalnykh issledovaniy [Journal of Institional Studies], 9(1), 117–133. DOI: 10.17835/2076–6297.2017.9.1.117–133(In Russ.)

Sanchez, A. M. & Bermejo, L. R. (2007). Public sector performance and efficiency in Europe the role of public R&D. Institute of Social and Economic Analysis: Madrid, 1, 41. Retrieved from: http://www3.uah.es/iaes/publicaciones/DT_01_07.pdf.

Ignatov, I. I. (2012). Rol akta Beya — Doula (Bayh-Dole Act-1980) v transfere nauchnykh znaniy i tekhnologiy iz amerikanskikh universitetov v korporativnyy sektor. Itogi tridtsatiletnego puti [The Role of Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 in the Knowledge and Technology Transfer from the U.S. Universities to the Corporate Sector: An Assessment of the 30-Year Way]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie [Science. Innovation. Education], 12, 159–188. (In Russ.)

Geiger, R. & Heller, D. E. (2011, January). Financial trends in higher education: The United States. Peking University Education Review. Working Paper, 6. Retrieved from: https://ed.psu.edu/cshe/working-papers/wp-6.

Kurakova, N. G., Tsvetkova, L. A. & Zinov, V. G. (2016). Patentnyy landshaft RF, sozdannyy rezidentami strany. Analiz vyyavlennykh problem [Russian patent landscape, created by the residents of the country: analysis of the identified issues]. Ekonomika nauki [The Economics of Science], 2(1), 64–79. (In Russ.)

Balatskiy, E. V. & Sergeeva, V. V. (2014). Nauchno-prakticheskaya rezultativnost rossiyskikh universitetov [Scientific and practical effectiveness of the Russian universities]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 2, 133–148. (In Russ.)

Glaysner, O. Yu. (2010). Vuzy Germanii. Nagruzka i zarplata [Higher education institutions of Germany: loading and salary]. Alma mater. Vestnik vysshey shkoly [Alma Mater. High School Herald], 4, 61–67. (In Russ.)

Tikhomirova, A. M. & Bannykh, G. A. (2014). Vyssheye obrazovanie v Chekhii glazami prepodavateley UrGEU [Higher Education in the Czech Republic through the Eyes of USUE Lecturers]. Upravlenets [The Manager], 4(50), 29–31. (In Russ.)

Published

26.02.2018

How to Cite

Romanov, E. V. (2018). Threats to the Human Capacity of Regional Higher Education Institutions. Economy of Regions, 14(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-8

Issue

Section

Research articles