Transition of Agriculture to Digital, Intellectual and Robotics Technologies

Authors

  • Egor Artyomovich Skvortsov Ural State Agricultural University
  • Ekaterina Gennadyevna Skvortsova Ural State Agricultural University
  • Ivan Stepanovich Sandu All-Russian Research Institute of Rural Economics
  • Grigory Aleksandrovich Iovlev Ural State Agricultural University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-3-23

Keywords:

Robotics technology, agricultural robotics, digital technologies, intelligent technologies, robotics, robots, milking robotics, robotization density, organizational and economic mechanism, investments, training

Abstract

At present, the entities of the agrarian sector are moving towards the digital, intellectual and robotic technologies or the robotization of the industry. Robotics is used in the various fields of the agrarian sector, the most widespread is the milking robotics. From 2006 to 2016, in the agricultural enterprises of the Russian Federation, 393 units of robotics were introduced. While in the Sverdlovsk region at the beginning of 2018, 37 units of this equipment have been used. We suggest to use the indicator of “density of agricultural robotization” to characterize the effectiveness of the transition to robotics. This indicator for Russia increased from 0.02 to 0.78 units, and for the Sverdlovsk region - from 0.3 to 3.17 for the periods under review. However, the slowdown and low values of the density of agricultural robotics make it necessary to develop appropriate measures. The article proposes a model of an organizational and economic mechanism for the transition to robotics. It includes target, investment, technical and technological as well as personnel sections. The initial data on the state of the introduction of robotics in agricultural organizations was provided by the ministries and departments, as well as statistical bodies. We determined scenarios of inertial, targeted and system development of robotics in agriculture depending on the level of state support. We have determined that the investments needed for the robotization of agricultural enterprises in the Sverdlovsk region are at the level of 472 million rubles. Moreover, we have formulated the tasks, recommendations and the expected result from the training of personnel capable to master robotics in the industry. The most important measure is the reduction in the cost of this equipment due to its domestic production. The results of the research can be used by the executive authorities in developing programmes for the innovative development and technical modernization of agriculture.

Author Biographies

Egor Artyomovich Skvortsov, Ural State Agricultural University

PhD in Economics, Research Fellow, Ural State Agricultural University; Scopus Author ID: 57193737212 (23, Turgeneva St., Ekaterinburg, 620041, Russian Federation; e-mail: 9089267986@mail.ru).

Ekaterina Gennadyevna Skvortsova, Ural State Agricultural University

Senior Lecturer, Ural State Agricultural University (23, Turgeneva St., Ekaterinburg, 620041, Russian Federation; e-mail: uralmash91@list.ru).

Ivan Stepanovich Sandu, All-Russian Research Institute of Rural Economics

Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Problems of Scientific and Technological Development, All-Russian Research Institute of Rural Economics; Scopus Author ID: 56019631800 (35/2 Khoroshevskoe Shosse, Moscow, 123007, Russian Federation; e-mail: anna_gu@mail.ru).

Grigory Aleksandrovich Iovlev, Ural State Agricultural University

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Ural State Agricultural University (23, Turgeneva St., Ekaterinburg, 620041, Russian Federation; e-mail: 89222087846@mail.ru).

References

Voronin, B. A. & Fateeva, N. B. (2014). Obespechenie kvalifitsirovannymi spetsialistami APK: sotsialno-ekonomicheskie problemy. Na primere Sverdlovskoy oblasti [Providing qualified AIC: Socio-economic problems (illustrated Sverdlovsk Region)]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals], 11, 60–63. (In Russ.)

Kizhlay, G. M., Kochurova, E. V. & Rogaleva, N. S. (2016). Effektivnost ispolzovaniya trudovykh resursov kak faktor rosta proizvodstva selskokhozyaystvennoy produktsii [Efficiency of use of labour resources as a growth factor of production of agricultural products]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals], 6, 101–110. (In Russ.)

Blinova, T. V. & Bylina, S. G. (2014). Stsenarnyy prognoz chislennosti selskogo naseleniya Rossii na srednesrochnuyu perspektivu [Medium Term Scenario Forecast of the Rural Population in Russia]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 4, 298–308. (In Russ.)

Akimov, A. (2016). Demograficheskiy vzryv, starenie naseleniya i trudosberegayushchie tekhnologii. Vzaimodeystvie v KHKHI v. [Demographic Burst, Population Ageing and Labor-saving Technologies: Interaction in the 21st Century]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World Economy and International Relations], 60(5), 50–60. (In Russ.)

Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization? Oxford: Oxford Martin School, 72.

Skvortsov, E. A. (2018). Povyshenie effektivnosti robotizatsii selskogo khozyaystva: avtoref. dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk [Increasing the effectiveness of agricultural robotics: Abstract of PhD thesis in Economics]. UrGAU [USAU]. Ekaterinburg, 24. (In Russ.)

Ivanov, Yu. A. (2014). Napravleniya nauchnykh issledovaniy po sozdaniyu innovatsionnoy tekhniki s intellektualnymi sistemami dlya zhivotnovodstva [Directions of scientific research on the creation of innovative technology with intelligent systems for livestock production]. Vestnik VNIIMZH [Journal of VNIIMZH], 3, 4–17. (In Russ.)

Kormanovskiy, L. P. (2013). Razvitie robotizatsii doeniya korov [Development of robotic milking cows]. Vestnik VNIIMZH [Journal of VNIIMZH], 2, 78–81. (In Russ.)

Skvortsov, E. A. Skvortsova, E. G., Nabokov, V. I. & Krivonogov, P. S. (2017). Primenenie doilnoy robototekhniki v regione [Robotic Milking Implementation in the Sverdlovsk Region]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 1, 249–260. doi 10.17059/2017–1–23. (In Russ.)

Ivanov, Yu. G. & Lapkin, A. G. (2013). Sravnitelnaya otsenka energo, trudo i ekspluatatsionnykh zatrat pri perevode korov s doeniya v molokoprovod na robot “lelyastronaut” [Comparative assessment of energy, labor and operating costs when translated from milking cows in the milk to the robot “Lely Astronaut”]. Vestnik VNIIMZH [Journal of VNIIMZH], 3, 188–191. (In Russ.)

Surovtsev, V. N., Bilkov, V. A. & Nikulina, Yu. N. (2013). Innovatsionnoye razvitie molochnogo zhivotnovodstva na severo-zapade RF kak osnova povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti proizvodstva moloka [Innovation development of dairy cattle breeding in the North-West of the Russian Federation as the basis for enhancing the competitiveness of milk production]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyye peremeny. Fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 4(28), 143–150. (In Russ.)

Gustafsson, M. & Benfalk, C. (2004). Different locations of instant cooling in the automatic milking system and the effect on milk quality. Proceedings of the international symposium Automatic Milking, a better understanding. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 526. DOI: 10.3920/978–90–8686–525–3.

Sumner, J. (1996). Farm production influences on milk hygiene quality. Proceedings of the IDF Symposium on Bacteriological Quality of Raw Milk. Wolfpassing, Austria, 94–102.

Mikulova, M. (2011). Content of free fatty acids lipolytic bacteria and somatic cells in relation to milking technology. Journal of Agrobiology, 28(1), 49–54. doi: 10.2478/v10146–011–0005–8.

Klungel, G. H., Slaghuis, B. A. & Hogeveen, H. (2000). The effect of the introduction of automatic milking on milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 1998–2003.

Abramova, N. I. & Serebrova, I. S. (2015). Vliyanie razlichnykh tekhnologiy proizvodstva moloka na molochnuyu produktivnost korov i soderzhanie somaticheskikh kletok [Effect of different milk production technology on milk yield of cows and somatic cell maintenance]. Molochnokhozyaystvennyy vestnik [Dairy Farming Journal], 4, 7–11. (In Russ.)

Skvortsov, E. A. (2016). Kadrovyy aspekt vnedreniya robototekhniki v selskom khozyaystve [Recruitment aspect of implementation of robotics in agriculture]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals], 2, 99–106. (In Russ.)

Keisner, A., Raffo, J. & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2016). Robotics: Breakthrough Technologies, Innovation, Intellectual Property. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(2), 7–27.

Morozov, N. M. & Gorbachev, M. I. (2008). Ekonomicheskie aspekty avtomatizatsii doeniya korov [Economic aspects of cow-milking automation]. Vestnik Federalnogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatelnogo uchrezhdeniya vysshego professionalnogo obrazovaniya “Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy agroinzhenernyy universitet im. V. P. Goryachkina” [Vestnik of the Federal state educational institution of higher professional education “Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V. P. Goryachkin”], 5, 13–15. (In Russ.)

Wauters E., Mathijs E. (2004). The economic implications of automatic milking: a simulation analysis for Belgium, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. In: Automatic milking, a better understanding. In: Meijering A., Hogeveen H., de Koning C. J. A. M. (Eds.) Wageningen. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 526; 68–74.

Surovtsev, V. N., Nikulina, Yu. N. & Bilkov, V. A. (2015). Povyshenie effektivnosti truda v molochnom skotovodstve na osnove innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Improving labor efficiency in dairy cattle breeding on the basis of innovative technologies]. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii [Economics of agriculture of Russia], 6, 28–36. (In Russ.)

Autor, D. H. Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. American Association for the Advancement of science. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6186/843.full?ijkey=75Wfa..Upt6b6&keytype=ref&siteid=sci. (date of access: 19.07.2017).

Meskens, L. & Mathijs, E. (2002). Socio-economic aspects of automatic milking, Motivation and characteristics of farmers in vesting in automatic milking systems. Deliverable D2 project EU: Implications of the introduction of automatic milking systems (QLK5–2000–31006), 16.

Mathijs, E. (2004). Socio-economic aspects of automatic milking. Proceedings of the international symposium Automatic Milking, a better understanding. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, 526. DOI: 10.3920/978–90–8686–525–3.

Krugman, P. (2012, December 9). Robors and Robber Barons. New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/opinion/krugman-robots-and-robber-barons.html?gwh=054BD73AB17F28CD31B3999AABFD7E86 (date of access: 19.07.2017).

Zemtsov, S. P. (2017). Roboty i potentsialnaya tekhnologicheskaya bezrabotitsa v regionakh Rossii. Opyt izucheniya i predvaritelnyye otsenki [Robots and potential technological unemployment in the Russian regions: Review and preliminary results]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Economics], 7, 142–157. (In Russ.)

Zakharov, A. P. (2009). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskiy mekhanizm innovatsionnogo razvitiya selskogo khozyaystva regiona. Na materialakh Penzenskoy oblasti: dis. … kand. ekon. nauk [Organizational and economic mechanism of innovative development of agriculture in the region (on the materials of the Penza region): PhD thesis in Economics]. Moscow, 137. (In Russ.)

Shumeyko, N. N. (2012). Povyshenie effektivnosti razvitiya molochno-produktovogo podkompleksa na osnove innovatsiy. Na primere Smolenskoy oblasti: dis. …kand. ekon. nauk [Increase of efficiency of development of a dairy product subcomplex on the basis of innovations (on an example of the Smolensk area): PhD thesis in Economics]. Moscow, 168. (In Russ.)

Nekrasov, K. V. (2013). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskiy mekhanizm innovatsionnogo razvitiya pererabatyvayushchikh organizatsiy molochno-produktovogo podkompleksa regiona: dis. … kand. ekon. nauk [Organizational and economic mechanism of innovative development of processing organizations of the dairy product subcomplex of the region: PhD thesis in Economics]. Ekaterinburg, 187. (In Russ.)

Mishurov, N. P., Solovyeva, N. F. & Tsoy Yu. A. (2010). Sovremennyye roboty v selskom khozyaystve [Agricultural Robots in Present-Day Conditions]. Tekhnika i oborudovanie dlya sela [Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area], 5, 46–48. (In Russ.)

Published

09.09.2018

How to Cite

Skvortsov, E. A., Skvortsova, E. G., Sandu, I. S., & Iovlev, G. A. (2018). Transition of Agriculture to Digital, Intellectual and Robotics Technologies. Economy of Regions, 14(3), 1014–1028. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-3-23

Issue

Section

Research articles