Innovative Activity of Business Managers as a Condition for Modernization of Regional Labour Potential

Authors

  • Vladimir Nikiforovich Belkin Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; South Ural State University
  • Nadezhda Andreyevna Belkina Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS
  • Olga Anatolyevna Antonova Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; South Ural State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-4-21

Keywords:

labour potential of a region, innovative activity of managers, innovative passivity of managers, incentive system for innovative activity of enterprise, innovation, innovator, innovative climate of an enterprise, incentives of innovative activity of managers, motives of innovative activity of managers, rationalization

Abstract

The article discusses the problems of the innovative activity of managers in Russian enterprises as one of the conditions for the development of the labour potential of a region. The paper shows the main reasons for the low innovative activity of Russian enterprises. The systems of labour relations that have developed, as a rule, generate labour and innovative passivity as well as the opportunistic behaviour of managers. Most Russian enterprises lack incentive schemes for managers’ innovative activity. We propose a systematic approach to stimulating the innovative activity of managers, relying on the authors’ experience of researching the innovative activity of managers in a number of enterprises. The authors’ system «Innovation», which is a Russian version of the Japanese lean manufacturing system, stimulates the innovative activity of personnel. Implementing this system in the enterprises of the Ural Federal District has convincingly shown that in modern conditions, a radical increase in the innovative activity of business managers is possible. It, therefore, stimulates the development of regional labour potential. Our hypothesis is that a high innovative activity of managers in Russian enterprises is possible by developing and implementing a two-sided incentive system for stimulating managers’ innovative activity. Such a system should provide not only incentives for innovative activity but also managers’ responsibility for their innovative passivity. We suggest a system of concepts of the innovative activity of personnel, which is necessary when organizing work to stimulate the innovative activity of enterprise managers. For the first time in the theory of incentives for staff and practical activities of enterprises, we propose to introduce a semi-annual assessment of the innovative activity of managers. The assessment of managers’ innovative activity is an instrument for incentives for an enterprise. Moreover, for managers, it becomes one of the motivational factors for the manifestation of innovation activity. The research results were applied in the development of the System of Innovative Activity of Managers in GAG Uralelectromed and GAG Shadrinsky Auto Aggregate Plant. The results of the research can be applied in industrial enterprises of different legal status and forms of ownership.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Nikiforovich Belkin, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; South Ural State University

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Professor, Department of Labor Economics and Human Resources Management, South Ural State University (87, Lenina Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454000; 76, Lenina Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian Federation; e -mail: akademiya28@bk.ru).

Nadezhda Andreyevna Belkina, Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Leading Research Associate, Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS (87, Lenina Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454000, Russian Federation; e-mail: akademiya28@bk.ru).

Olga Anatolyevna Antonova, Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; South Ural State University

PhD in Economics, Senior Research Associate, Chelyabinsk Branch of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Associate Professor, Department of Labor Economics and Personnel Management, South Ural State University; Associate Professor, Department of Economics of the Legal Foundations of Management, Chelyabinsk State University (87, Lenina Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454000; 76, Lenina Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080; 129, Bratyev Kashirinykh St., Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russian Federation; e-mail: akademiya28@bk.ru).

References

Statistika nauki i obrazovaniya. Vy. 4. Innovatsionnaya deyatelnost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Inf.-stat. mat. [Statistics of science and education. Iss. 4. Innovative activity in the Russian Federation. Info-stat. mat.]. (2017). Moscow: FGBNU NII RINKTSE Publ., 92. (In Russ.)

Lukicheva, L. I. (2010). Upravlenie intellektualnym kapitalom [Management of intellectual capital]. Moscow: Omega-L Publ., 239. (In Russ.)

Kibanov, A. Ya., Durakova, I. B., Esaulova I. A. et al. (2015). Upravlenie personalom v Rossii. Istoriya i sovremennost [Personnel management in Russia: History and Modernity]. In: A. Ya. Kibanov (Ed.). Moscow: Infra-M Publ., 240. (In Russ.)

Kotler, P. (2016). Konets kapitalizma? 14 antidotov ot bolezney rynochnoy ekonomiki [Confronting Capitalism: Real Solutions for a Troubled Economic System]. Trans. from English by K. Shashkova. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 288. (In Russ.)

Belkin, V. N. Belkina, N. A. & Antonova, O. A. (2017). Teoreticheskie osnovy stimulirovaniya innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti menedzherov predpriyatiy [Theoretical foundations of stimulation of innovative activity of managers of enterprises]. Vestnik fakulteta upravleniya ChelGU [Bulletin of Management Department of Chelyabinsk State University], 2, 164. (In Russ.)

Mescon, M., Albert, M. & Hedouri, F. (2007). Osnovy menedzhmenta: per. s angl. [Management: trans. from English]; 3rd ed. Moscow: Williams Publ., 672. (In Russ.)

Ozernikova, T. G. & Nosyreva, I. G. (2015). Oplata truda personala: ucheb. posobie [Staff salaries: textbook]. Irkutsk: BGUEP Publ., 390. (In Russ.)

Rother, M. (2014). Toyota Kata. Liderstvo, menedzhment i razvitie sotrudnikov dlya dostizheniya vydayushchikhsya rezultatov [Toyota Kata: Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness and Superior Results]. St. Petersburg: Piter Press, 304. (In Russ.)

Liker, J. (2011). Korporativnaya kultura Toyoty. Uroki dlya grupp kompaniy [Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way]. Moscow: Alpina Publ., 354. (In Russ.)

Berger, D. R. & Berger L. A. (Eds). (2008). Entsiklopediya sistem motivatsii i oplaty truda: per. s angl. [The Compensation Handbook: trans. from English]. Moscow: Al’pina Biznes Buks, 761. (In Russ.)

Allee, V. (2002). The Future of Knowledge: Increasing Prosperity through Value Network. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 232.

Luthy, D. H. (1998). Intellectual capital and its measurement. Proceedings of the Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (APIRA), Osaka, Japan, 16–17. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.200.5655&rep=rep1&type=pdf (date of access: 20.02.2018).

Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business, 240.

Bontis, N. (1996). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models? ASAC, 17th Annual McMaster Business Conference, Managing Intellectual Capital and Innovation, Hamilton, Canada, 24–25.

Rodov, I. & Leliaert, Ph. (2002). FiMIAM: financial method of intangible assets measurement. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 323–336.

Scarborough, H. & Elias, J. (2002). Evaluating Human Capital. GB: CIPD, 71.

Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual capital. The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday / Currency, 261.

Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston Massachusetts: Havard Business School Press, 1–7.

Chingos, P. T. (2004). Oplata po rezultatu. Iz opyta oplaty truda personala v SSHA: per. s angl. [Paying for Performance A Guide to Compensation Management: trans. from English]. Moscow: Williams Publ., 416. (In Russ.)

Belkin, V. N. (2011). Modernizatsiya trudovykh otnosheniy na rossiyskikh predpriyatiyakh [Modernization of labour relations at Russian enterprises]. Dostoynyy trud — osnova stabilnogo obshchestva. Mat-ly III mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [«Decent Work — the Basis of a Stable Society. Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference]. In: N. Z. Shaymardanov (Ed.). Ekaterinburg: Zakonodatelnoye Sobranie Sverdlovskoy oblasti Publ., 102; 30–41. (In Russ.)

Belkin, V. N., Belkina, N. A. & Antonova, O. A. (2016). Organizatsionnyy kapital predpriyatiya [Organizational Capital of the Enterprise]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 12(3), 826–838. (In Russ.)

Published

03.12.2018

How to Cite

Belkin, V. N., Belkina, N. A., & Antonova, O. A. (2018). Innovative Activity of Business Managers as a Condition for Modernization of Regional Labour Potential. Economy of Regions, 14(4), 1327–1340. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-4-21

Issue

Section

Research articles