Distribution of Cities in Federal Districts of Russia: Testing of the Zipf Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-1-7Keywords:
Zipf low, "rank-size", Pareto index, city, federal district, city size, population, interregional differentiation, distribution of cities, territorial distributionAbstract
At the modern stage of globalization pressures, imbalance in the distribution of cities in territorial space poses a threat to Russia’s economic development and social stability, which actualizes economic research on this issue. The purpose of the article is to analyze the distribution of cities within the boundaries of federal districts with the application of the Zipf law. I have chosen this law as it allows connecting the population of the city with its place in the hierarchy of the urban systems in regions, federal districts and the country, in general. The Zipf law holds if the distribution of the population is uniform. The information base is the data of the Federal State Statistics Service. For the study, I have formed a sample of cities for each Federal District. This sample included 10 most populous cities by 2015. The hypothesis about the lognormal distribution of cities within the borders of the Russian federal districts is tested using the method of least squares. The calculations determined the estimated parameter K in the range from 0.6 to 1.4, which demonstrates the uneven distribution of cities within the borders of the federal districts of Russia (the exception is Volga Federal District K = 1). In the Central Federal District, Northwestern Federal District and Ural Federal District, the population is concentrated in large cities: Moscow, St. Petersburg and Ekaterinburg. In the North Caucasian Federal District, Privolzhsky Federal District, Siberian Federal District and Far Eastern Federal District, the population is disproportionately dispersed. In the territory of Russia, there is no intermediate group of cities with the population from 2000 to 5000 thousand people. The identification of the peculiarities of the distribution of cities within the borders of the federal districts of Russia is necessary for the development of scientifically substantiated recommendations of social and economic policies. The conducted research is a stage in the development of methodological tools for choosing the location of industrial production in the territories and for determining the optimal size of a city.References
Eaton, J. & Eckstein, Z. (1997). Cities and growth: theory and evidence from France and Japan. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27, 443–474.
Auerbach, F. (1913). Das gesetz der bevölkerungskonzentration, Petermanns. Geographische Mitteilungen, 59, 74–76.
Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: an explanation. Quarterly journal of Economics, 114(3), 739–767. doi:
10.1162/003355399556133.
Córdoba, J.-C. (2008). On the distribution of city sizes. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 177–197.
Córdoba, J. C. (2008). A generalized Gibrat’s law. International Economic Review, 49, 1463–1468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468– 2354.2008.00518.x.
Duranton, G. (2007). Urban evolutions: Th e fast, the slow, and the still. Th e American Economic Review, 97, 197–221.
Rossi-Hansberg, E. & Wright, M. L. (2007). Urban structure and growth. Th e Review of Economic Studies, 74, 597–624.
Behrens, K., Duranton, G. & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2014). Productive cities: Sorting, selection, and agglomeration. Journal of Political Economy, 122, 507–553. doi: 10.1086/675534.
Hsu, W. T. (2012). Central place theory and city size distribution. Th e Economic Journal, 122, 903–932. doi:10.1111/ j.1468–0297.2012.02518.x.
Mansury, Y. & Gulyás, L. (2007). Th e emergence of Zipf’s Law in a system of cities: An agent-based simulation approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 2438–2460. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2006.08.002.
Krugman, P. (1996). Confronting the Mystery of Urban Hierarchy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10, 399–418.
Ioannides, Y. M. & Overman, H. G. (2003). Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 127–137. doi:10.1016 / S0166–0462 (02) 00006–6.
Berry, B. J. & Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2012). Th e city size distribution debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas. Cities, 29(1), 17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.007.
Ziqin, W. (2016). Zipf Law Analysis of Urban Scale in China. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 1, 53–58. doi:10.20849/ajsss.v1i1.21.
Schaff ar, A. & Dimou, M. (2012). Rank-size City Dynamics in China and India, 1981–2004. Regional Studies, 46, 707–721. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.521146.
Black, D. & Henderson, V. (2003). Urban evolution in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 343–372.
Eeckhout, J. (2009). Gibrat’s Law for (All) Cities: Reply. Th e American Economic Review, 99, 1676–1683.
Levy, M. (2009). Gibrat’s Law for (All) Cities: Comment. Th e American Economic Review, 99, 1672–1675.
Bee, M., Riccaboni, M. & Schiavo, S. (2013). Th e size distribution of US cities: Not Pareto, even in the tail. Economics Letters, 120, 232–237. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.035.
Soo, K. T. (2007). Zipf’s Law and Urban Growth in Malaysia. Urban Studies, 44, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/00420980601023869.
Pérez-Campuzano, E., Guzmán-Vargas, L. & Angulo-Brown, F. (2015). Distributions of city sizes in Mexico duringthe 20th century. Chaos, Solitons & Fractalsm, 73, 64–70.
Duran, H. E. & Ozkan, S. P. (2015). Trade Openness, Urban Concentration And City-Size Growth In Turkey. Regional Science Inquiry, 7, 35–46.
Kolomak, E. A. (2014). Razvitie gorodskikh sistem Rossii. Tendentsii i faktory [Development of Russian Urban System:Tendencies and Determinants]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Economics], 10, 82–96. (In Russ.)
Andreev, V. V., Lukiyanova, V. Yu. & Kadyshev, E. N. (2017). Analiz territorialnogo raspredeleniya naseleniya v subektakh Privolzhskogo federalnogo okruga s primeneniem zakona Tsipfa i Gibrata [Analysis of people territorial distribution in regions of the Volga Federal District on the base of Zipf and Gibrat laws]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 48, 97–121. (In Russ.)
Gabaix, X. & Ioannides, Y. M. (2004). Th e Evolution of City Size Distributions. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Cities and Geography, 2341–378.
Regiony Rossii. Osnovnye sotsialno-ekonomicheskie pokazateli gorodov [Regions of Russia. Th e main socio-economic indicators of the cities]. (2016). Federalnaya sluzhba Gosudarstvennoy statistiki [Federal State Statistics Service]. Retrieved from: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b16_14t/Main.htm (date of access: 09.02.2018). (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Inna Vladimirovna Manaeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
