Implementing the Potential of Intellectual Products’ Commercialisation in the International Trading System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-1-19Keywords:
intellectual products, objects of intellectual property, scientific and technological security, reproductive methodology, endogenous potential of commercialisation, competence-based "failure" ("trap"), international trade, system of indicators, analytical and epistemological method, economic-legal methodAbstract
The contradiction between relatively high level of domestic inventive activity and low effectiveness of the country’s participation in international trade is a relevant problem. That contradiction poses a hypothesis: the effectiveness of intellectual products’ commercialisation is determined not only by well-known institutional factors, but also by specific multi-faceted endogenous potential of these products. The implementation of this potential in practice, including international trade, depends on the level of professionalism, intellectual competence and creativity of the relevant specialists. The purpose of the study is to identify and justify the leading factors that allow the fullest realization of intellectual products’ potential and their successful commercialization for ensuring country’s scientific and technological security. Factual and statistical materials were an empirical basis of this research. I applied a variety of methods: analytical and epistemological, economic and legal, structural and logical methods, statistical groupings, comparative assessments. For a focused quantitative assessment, I have selected a system of indicators: net value of the subject of technology agreements; balance of payments for technology; balance of license royalties for the use of objects of intellectual property (IP). The calculations revealed a comparative assessment of the products’ level of commercialisation in the leading countries (both recipients and payers of royalties and license fees). I have determined the main units of the productive institutional mechanisms of intellectual products commercialization in these countries that opens possibilities for creating a corresponding mechanism in Russia. A reproductive model for commercialization of intellectual products justifies the need of highly skilled, creative specialists in order to overcome the intellectual- and competence-based «failure» («trap»). Based on the system of the selected indicators, the study allows to objectively assess the implementation of intellectual products’ commercial potential. The results of the research can be used in development and application of relevant laws and regulations, as well as in training of specialists and experts.References
Volkova, T. I. (2006). Tvorcheskiy potentsial nauki kak obekt teoreticheskogo ekonomicheskogo issledovaniya [Creative potential of science as an object of theoretical economic research]. Izvestiya Uralskogo Gosudarstvennogo Ekonomicheskogo Universiteta [Journal of the Ural State University of Economics], 2(14), 3–12. (In Russ.)
Volkova, T. I. & Usoltsev, I. A. (2010). Intellektualnye produkty nauchnoy sfery: potentsial kommertsializatsii [Intellectual products of scientifi c sphere: commercialization potential]. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics UB RAS Publ., 171. (In Russ.)
Akerlof, G. A. (1994). Rynok “limonov”: neopredelennost kachestva i rynochnyy mekhanizm [Th e Market for
«Lemons»: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism]. Trans. from English. THESIS, 5, 91–104. (In Russ.)
Allen, F. (1984). Reputation and Product Quality. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(3), 311–327. DOI: 10.2307/2555440.
De Alessi, L. & Staaf, R. J. (1994). What does reputation really assure? Th e relationship of trademarks to expectations and legal remedies. Economic Inquiry, XXXII, 477–485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465–7295.1994.tb01344.x
Arrow, K. J. (1993). Vozmozhnosti i predely rynka kak mekhanizma raspredeleniya resursov [Th e Potentials and Limits of the Market in Resource Allocation]. Trans. from English. THESIS, 2, 53–68. (In Russ.)
Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Th e Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (pp. 609–626). Prinston: Prinston University Press. DOI: 10.1007/978–1349–15486–9_13.
Mansfi eld, E. (1970). Ekonomika nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa [Economics of scientifi c and technological progress].
Trans. from English. Moscow: Progress, 237. (In Russ.)
Falvey, R., Foster, N. & Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700–719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9361.2006.00343.x.
Chen, Y. & Puttitanun T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.11.005.
Mansfi eld, E. (1986). Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science, 32, 173–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173
Allen, R. C. (2012). Prodvizhenie novykh tekhnologiy na rynok [Bringing New Technology to Market]. Trans. from English. Moscow: Binom. Laboratoriya znaniy, 455. (In Russ.)
Gilbert, R. (2011). A World without Intellectual Property? A Review of Michele Boldrin and David Levine’s Against Intellectual Monopoly. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 421–432. DOI: 10.1257/jel.49.2.421.
Volkova, T. I. (1999). Intellektualnaya sobstvennost v nauchno-tekhnicheskoy sfere [Intellectual property in science and technology]. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics UB RAS Publ., 170. (In Russ.)
Pilnov, G., Tarasova, O. & Yanovskiy, A. (2006). Kak provodit tekhnologicheskiy audit [How to conduct a technology audit]. Moscow: EuropeAid «Science and technology commercialization» project, 96. (In Russ.)
Fonshteyn, N. M. (Ed.). (1999). Osnovy kommertsializatsii rezultatov NIOKR i tekhnologiy [Fundamentals of the commercialization of R & D results and technologies]. Moscow: Th e Russian presidential academy of national economy and public administration, 271. (In Russ.)
Dezhina, I. & Saltykov, B. (2005). Mekhanizmy stimulirovaniya kommertsializatsii issledovaniy i razrabotok [Mechanisms of encouraging commercialization of research and development]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods], 12, 178–205. (In Russ.)
Antonets, V. A., Nechayeva, N. V., Khomkin, K. A. & Shvedova, V. V. (Eds.) (2010). Innovatsionnyy biznes: formirovanie modeley kommertsializatsii perspektivnykh razrabotok [Innovative business: formation of the models for commercialization of promising developments]. Moscow: Delo, 320. (In Russ.)
Konov, Yu. P. & Goncharenko, L. P. (2010). Rynok intellektyalnoy sobstvennosti [Intellectual property market].
Moscow: Ekonomika, 540. (In Russ.)
Leont’ev, B. B. & Leont’eva, V. B. (2017). Sistemnye resheniya v formirovanii natsionalnoy innovatsionnoy sistemy [System solutions in the formation of the national innovation system]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 9, 28–38. (In Russ.)
Kortov, S. V., Shulgin, D. B., Tolmachev, D. E. & Yegarmina, A. D. (2017). Analiz tekhnologicheskikh trendov na osnove postroeniya patentnykh landshaft ov [Technology Trends Analysis Using Patent Landscaping]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Redion], 13(3), 935–947. DOI: 10.17059/2017–3-24 (In Russ.)
Volkova, T. I. & Usoltsev, I. A. (2017). Inventive activity of reasearchers: cross-country rating assessments. Economika regiona [Economy of region], 13(1), 290–307. DOI: 10.17059/2017–1-26. (In Russ.)
Starodubov, V. I. & Kurakova, N. G. (2017). Optimizatsiya fi nansirovaniya issledovaniy i razrabotok v Rossii: analiz sootvetstviya problem i resheniy [Optimization of the fi nancing of fundamental and applied researches in Russia: the analysis of conformity of the problems and solutions]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Herald of the Russian Academy of
Sciences], 87(11), 963–973. DOI: 10.7868/S0869587317110019. (In Russ.)
Zinov, V. G., Kurakova, N. G. & Cherchenko, O. V. (2017). Patenty grazhdan RF, ne imeyushchie rossiyskogo priopriteta, kak otrazhenie problem tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya strany [Th e problem of selection of indicators, refl ecting the proportion of high-tech products in the global market]. Ekonomika nauki [Th e economics of science], 3(2), 105–115. (In
Russ.)
Kim, L. (1991). Pros and Cons of International Technology Transfer: a Developing Country View. In: T. Agmon, M. A.
von Glinow (Eds.), Technology Transfer in International Business (pp. 223–239). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Rathkeen, L. (2017). Kapitalovlozheniya v intellektualnuyu sobstvennost na primere sistemnogo transferta fundamentalnykh i prikladnykh razrabotok v “sistemoobrazuyushchie innovatsii” [Investment to the intellectual property on the example of system transfer of fundamental and applied scientifi c products to «system-forming innovations»]. Investitsii v Rossii [Investments in Russia], 6, 45–48. (In Russ.)
Klavdienko, V. P. (2016). Natsionalnaya innovatsionnaya sistema Kitaya: stanovlenie i razvitie [National innovation system of China: foundation and transition]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 4, 97–103. (In Russ.)
Menshikova, A. M. (2017). Perspektivy innovatsionnoy politiki S.Sh.A. [Prospects of Innovative Policy of U.S]. S.
Sh. A. v Kanada: Ekonomika — Politika — Kultura [USA v Canada: Economics — Politics — Culture], 8, 101–115. (In Russ.)
Portanskiy, A. P. (2018). Tramp razrushaet slozhivshiesya pravila i printsipy mirovoy torgovli [Trump destroys the established rules and principles of the world trade]. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika [Th e World Economics], 6, 7–18. (In Russ.)
Volynets-Russet, E. Ya. (2004). Kommercheskaya realizatsiya izobreteiy I nou-hau (na vneshnikh i vnutrennikh rynkakh) [Commercial implementation of inventions and know-how (in foreign and domestic markets)]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 326. (In Russ.)
Shakirov, A. (2012). Protivodeystvie S. Sh. A. narusheniyam prav intellektualnoy sobstvennosti na mezhdunarodnykh rynkakh [Th e counteraction of the USA to violations of intellectual property rights in the international market]. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk [Th e Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences],
4, 113–124. (In Russ.)
Dagayev, A. (2013). Innovatsii dlya innovatsiy: novye tendentsii v kommertsializatsii intellektualnoy sobstvennosti
[Innovations for innovations: new trends in commercialization of intellectual property]. Federalizm, 4, 165–172. (In Russ.)
Volynets-Russet, E. Ya. (2004). Rossii nuzhna gosudarstvennaya kontseptsiya uchastiya v mezhdunarodnom tekhnologicheskom obmene (na osnove izaobreteniy i nou-hau) [Russia needs a state concept of participation in international technological exchange (based on inventions and know-how)]. Vneshneekonomicheskiy bulleten [Russian foreign economic journal], 2, 37–43. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Tatyana Ivanovna Volkova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
