Coordinating the Priorities of Scientific, Technological and Spatial Development of Industrial Regions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-5Keywords:
priorities of development, scientific and technological development, spatial development, coordination of priorities, industrial region, Ural-Siberian macro-region, project approach, project selection, integrated investment project, transport and logistics systemAbstract
The article develops the methodological approach to coordinating the priorities of scientific, technological and spatial development of regions. The relevance of the study is due to the significance of choosing the benchmarks for the transformation of regional economic systems. These systems are based on the principles of harmonisation of the social and economic interests of individuals, business entities, territories of different levels, and modern prospects for the development of science and technology. The study aims to substantiate the methodology for assessing and selecting priorities for coordinating scientific, technological and spatial development of the economies of industrialised regions. The methodology is based on a combination of the individual territories' interests due to their joint participation in integrated investment projects of interregional significance. We applied general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical knowledge, including a causal method, a method of analysis and synthesis, a method of scientific abstraction. We substantiated the role of macro-regions in the process of integration of the local territories' initiatives with the national development guidelines. Then, we identified the characteristics of integrated investment projects with significant potential, which can be the basis for determining the criteria for assessing and selecting projects and project initiatives proposedfor implementation at the supra-regional level. Further, we offered an algorithm for developing an integrated investment project that determines the sequence of events. Such events allow realisation of opportunities of scientific and technological development available for industrialised regions, taking into account the priorities of their spatial transformations. We tested the algorithm using the industrial Ural-Siberian macro-region as an example, identifying key aspects of the “Ural Highway” pilot project. A specific feature of the developed approach is the proposal of a “bipolar” system for determining priorities. It allows integration of the national guidelines for scientific, technological and spatial development with the prospects for transformation defined by individual territories (industrialised regions). The proposed approach can be used to substantiate proposals and strategic measures aimed at implementing the priorities of spatial development and the development of science and technology in industrialised regions.References
Kuznetsova, O. V. (2019). Problemy vybora proritetov prostranstvennogo razvitiya [The problem of choosing spatial development priorities]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 1, 146–157. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2019–1-146–157 (In Russ.)
Molchanov, I. N. & Molchanova, N. P. (2019). Osobennosti formirovaniya Strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii [Features of the formation of the Spatial Development Strategy of Russia]. In: V. I. Gerasimov (Ed.), Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. Ezhegodnik. Vypusk 14 [Russia: trends and development prospects. Yearbook. Issue 14] (pp. 159–165). Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)
Kozhevnikov, S. A. (2019). Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i perspektivy transformatsii rossiyskogo prostranstva [Strategyfor Russia’s Spatial Developmentand Prospectsfor Russian Space Transformation]. Voprosy territorialnogo razvitiya [Territorial development issues], 3(48). Retrieved from: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/28193 (Date of access: 15.10.2019). DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2019.3.48.1 (In Russ.)
Haque, M. S. (2013). Globalization, State Formation, and Reinvention in Public Governance: Exploring the Linkages and Patterns in Southeast Asia. Public Organization Review, 13(4), 381–396.
Yilmaz, S. & Changming, L. (2019). Remaking Eurasia: the Belt and Road Initiative and China-Russia strategic part- nership. Asia Europe Journal. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308–019–00547–1#citeas (Date of access: 27.10.2019). DOI: 10.1007/s10308–019–00547–1.
Mikova, N., Eichhammer W. & Pfluger, B. (2019). Low-carbon energy scenarios 2050 in north-west European countries: Towards a more harmonised approach to achieve the EU. Energy Policy, 130, 448–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.047.
Rohrbach, D., Minde, I. J. & Howard, J. (2003). Looking beyond national boundaries: regional harmonization of seed policies, laws and regulations. Food Policy, 28(4), 317–333. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2003.08.005
Strunz, S., Gawel, E., Lehmann, P., Ribera, T., Rüdinger, A., Boscheck, R., … de Jong, J. (2014). Energy policy: European, national, regional? Intereconomics, 49(5), 244–267. DOI: 10.1007/s10272–014–0507-x.
Oates, W. A. (1998). Environmental Policy in the European Community: Harmonization or National Standards? Empirica, 25(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006832604045.
Kampragou, E., Apostolaki, S., Manoli, E., Froebrich, J. & Assimacopoulos, D. (2011). Towards the harmonization of water-related policies for managing drought risks across the EU. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(7), 815–824. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.001.
Tolkki, H., Haveri, A., Airaksinen, J. & Valkonen, E. (2011). Governance in Regional Development — Between Regulation and Self-regulation. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 313–333.
Medve-Balint, G. (2018). The Cohesion Policy on the EU’s Eastern and Southern Periphery: Misallocated Funds? Studies in Comparative International Development, 53(2), 218–238. DOI: 10.1007/s12116–018–9265–2.
Rodriguez, V. & Soeparwata, A. (2015). The Governance of Science, Technology and Innovation in ASEAN and Its Member States. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 228–249. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–011–0603–7.
Clar, G. & Sautter, B. (2014). Research Driven Clusters at the Heart of (Trans-) Regional Learning and Priority- Setting Processes. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 156–180. DOI: 10.1007/s13132–014–0180–0.
Gerasimova, Yu. V. (2018). Analiz soglasovannosti pokazateley gosudarstvennykh program (obespechenie grazhdan zhilem i razvitie fizicheskoy kultury i sporta), ustanovlennykh na federalnom i regionalnom urovne [Indicator Conformity Analysis of State Programs (Housing and Sports Development) at Federal and Regional Levels]. Upravlencheskie nauki [Management sciences in Russia], 8(4), 25–39. DOI: 10.26794/2404–022Х-2018–8-4–25–39 (In Russ.)
Ivanov, O. B. & Bukhvald, E. M. (2019). Natsionalnye proekty Rossii: Regionalnye izmereniya [National Projects of Russia: Regional Dimension]. ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz i praktika [ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice], 1, 37–53. DOI: 10.24411/2071–6435–2019–10067 (In Russ.)
Chekalin, V. S., Karasev, O. I. & Rakov, D. A. (2019). Natsionalnye tseli razvitiya i puti ikh dostizheniya [National development goals and ways of their achievement]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 4(118), 14–19. (In Russ.)
Popova, E. S. (2012). Mekhanizm vzaimovliyaniya napravleniy regionalnogo razvitiya i strategiy razvitiya [The Mechanism of Interaction of Directions of Regional Development and Strategies of Universities]. ARS ADMINISTRANDI, 2, 47–54. (In Russ.)
Ahmedova, L. Sh. & Idziev, G. I. (2012). Ustoychivoe razvitie territorii s uchetom interesov razlichnykh tselevykh grupp [Sustainable development of territory taking into account interests of various target groups]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya [Financial Analytics: Science and Experience], 36(126), 28–32. (In Russ.)
Ershova, N. A. & Sergeeva, N. V. (2018). Sravnitelnyy analiz prioritetov sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Republiki Komi po subektam tselepolaganiya [Comparative analysis of the priorities of the socio-economic development of the Komi Republic by subjects of goal setting]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipalnoe upravlenie: uchenye zapiski SKAGS [State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes], 4, 43–49. DOI: 10.22394/2079–1690–2018–1-4–43–49 (In Russ.)
Kirpanev, V. P. (2010). Promyshlennaya politika kak instrument soglasovaniya chastnykh i gosudarstvennykh interesov [Industrial policy as an instrument of harmonization of private and public interests]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Ekonomika [The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, Series «Economics»], 2, 30–34. (In Russ.)
Balashova, S. P. & Sirotenko, M. V. (2015). Soglasovanie strategicheskikh prioritetov i proektov v ramkakh realizatsii strategii sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya munitsipalnogo obrazovaniya [The coordination of strategic priorities and projects within the framework of the strategy of social and economic development of a municipality]. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University], 11(133), 140–144. (In Russ.)
Grodskaya, G. N. & Valyaeva, E. S. (2019). Gosudarstvennye programmy v sisteme strategicheskogo planirovaniya: mekhanizm integratsii i realizatsiya printsipov proektnogo planirovaniya [State programs in the strategic planning system: integration mechanism and implementation of the principles of project management]. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im.
V. N. Tatishcheva [Vestnik of Volzhsky University after V.N. Tatischev], 2(3), 31–41. (In Russ.)
Klochkov, V. V. (2019). Vzaimosvyaz strategiy nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo i prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii [Interconnection of the strategies of scientific, technological and spatial development of Russia]. In: V. I. Gerasimov (Ed.), Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. Ezhegodnik. Vypusk 14 [Russia: trends and development prospects. Yearbook. Issue 14] (pp. 101–106). Mosco: INION RAN. (In Russ.)
Charkina, E. S. (2017). Razvitie proektnogo podkhoda v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: Metodologiya, opyt, problemн. Nauchnyy doklad [Development of a project approach in public administration: methodology, experience, problems. Scientific report]. Moscow: IE RAS, 54. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Yuliya Georgievna Lavrikova, Victoria Viktorovna Akberdina, Arina Valeryevna Suvorova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
