Systematisation of Approaches to Assessing the Development of Smart Cities

Authors

  • Evgeny Vasilyevich Popov Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS
  • Konstantin Aleksandrovich Semyachkov Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-2

Keywords:

smart city, digital economy, methodology, model, assessment methodology, urban environment, sustainable development, municipal economy, territorial development, regional economy

Abstract

The study aims to systematise the existing methodological approaches to assessing the development of smart cities, elaborated by a number of international institutions (organizations). Moreover, it identifies characteristics of the assessment and possibilities of its application in the Russian context. We considered the fundamentals of a smart city’s development as our research object. Methodological approaches to assessing the development of smart cities are our research subject. We analysed scientific research, published in the periodical press, as well as the residts of the authors’ study on the digitization processes of socio-economic systems, the principles of the urban environment’s digitization, and the urban development’s fundamentals based on the smart city’s concept. The research method is a logical analysis of modern approaches to assessing the development of smart cities. The paper identifies and analyses the main characteristics and conditions for the effective functioning of smart cities. We consider a model of the development levels of a smart city. Furthermore, we demonstrate the importance of cooperation among stakeholders in the field of the urban environment’s development, as it creates new opportunities and ensures the long-term viability of smart cities’ projects. We note that one of the most important factors in the development of smart cities is the increment in human capital of their inhabitants. Lifelong learning and advanced training are becoming a condition for the development of modern socio-economic systems. The dominant role of highly-skilled creative work becomes the determining factor for the development of a new type of society and its inherent economy. In the paper, we have described and systemized the main approaches to assessing the development of smart cities. We have formulated a number of principles for constructing a methodology for assessing smart cities. The study has theoretical relevance due to the development of approaches to assessing the development of smart cities. The practical significance of the research lies in shaping possible future studies of rational economic management in the context of the digital society.

Author Biographies

Evgeny Vasilyevich Popov, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

Corresponding Member of RAS, Doctor of Economics, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Center of Economic Theory, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Scopus Author ID: 24822113400 (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: epopov@mail.ru).

Konstantin Aleksandrovich Semyachkov, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS

PhD in Economics, Research Assistant, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: k.semyachkov@mail.ru).

References

Joia, L. A. & Kuhl, A. (2019). Smart City for Development: A Conceptual Model for Developing Countries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 203–214. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-030–19115–3_17.

Popov, E. V. & Semyachkov, K. A. (2018). Komparativnyy analiz strategicheskikh aspektov razvitiya tsifrovoy ekonomiki [Comparative analysis of strategic aspects of development of digital economy]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. [Perm University Herald. Economy], 13(1), 19–36. (In Russ.)

Neuroni, A. C., Haller, S., van Winden, W., Carabias-Hütter, V. & Yildirim, O. (2019). Public Value Creation in a Smart City Context: An Analysis Framework. In: M. Pedro, R. Bolivar (Eds.), Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities (pp. 49–76). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-319–98953–2_3.

Paskaleva, K. & Cooper, I. (2019). Innovations in Co-Created Smart City Services. In: M. Pedro, R. Bolivar (Eds.), Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities (pp. 165–195). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-319– 98953–2_7.

Anttiroiko, A.-V., Valkama, P. & Bailey, S. J. (2013). Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services. AI & SOCIETY, 29(3), 323–334. DOI: 10.1007/s00146–013–0464–0.

Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E. & Wareham, J. (2012). A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 135–148. DOI: 10.1007/s13132–012–0084–9.

Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11(5), 2544–2551. DOI: 10.24297/ijct.v11i5.1142.

Bibri, S. E. (2018). Transitioning from Smart Cities to Smarter Cities: The Future Potential of ICT of Pervasive Computing for Advancing Environmental Sustainability. In: S. E. Bibri, Smart Sustainable Cities of the Future (pp. 535–599). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-319–73981–6_10.

Monzon, A. (2015). Smart Cities Concept and Challenges: Bases for the Assessment of Smart City Projects. Smart Cities, Green Technologies, and Intelligent Transport Systems, 17–31. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-319–27753–0_2.

Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 639–649.

Rabari, C. & Storper, M. (2014). The digital skin of cities: urban theory and research in the age of the sensored and metered city, ubiquitous computing and big data. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 27–42. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu021.

Cardullo, P. & Kitchin, R. (2018). Being a “citizen” in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen partic- ipation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s10708–018–9845–8.

Okwechime, E., Duncan, P. & Edgar, D. (2017). Big data and smart cities: a public sector organizational learning per- spective. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16(3), 601–625. DOI: 10.1007/s10257–017–0344–0.

Zygiaris, S. (2012). Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 217–231. DOI: 10.1007/s13132–012–0089–4.

Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M. & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2012–01703–3.

Tekin Bilbil, E. (2016). The Operationalizing Aspects of Smart Cities: the Case of Turkey’s Smart Strategies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(3), 1032–1048. DOI: 10.1007/s13132–016–0423–3.

Popov, E. V. & Semyachkov, K. A. (2018). Problemy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti tsifrovogo obshchestva v uslovi- yakh globalizatsii [Problems of Economic Security for Digital Society in the Context of Globalization]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 14(4), 1088–1101. (In Russ.)

Popov, E., Kortov, S. & Semyachkov, K. (2019). Intellectual capital of smart cities as object for institutional modeling. In: В M. Sargiacomo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital, ECIIC 2019 (pp. 210–217). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.

Al-Ammal, H. M. & Aljawder, M. M. (2018). Development of a National Smart City Initiatives Framework for the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Blueprint for Successful Smart Cities. Smart Cities in the Gulf, 41–57. DOI: 10.1007/978–981–13– 2011–8_4.

Rader Olsson, A. & Cars, G. (2011). Polycentric spatial development: institutional challenges to intermunicipal coop- eration. Jahrbuch Für Regionalwissenschaft, 31(2), 155–171. DOI: 10.1007/s10037–011–0054-x.

Sardana, D. & Zhu, Y. (2017). Institutional Environment. In: D. Sardana, Y. Zhu (Eds.), Conducting Business in China and India (pp. 85–155). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/978–1-137–54721–7_4.

Eraydin, A. & Taşan-Kok, T. (Eds.). (2013). Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning. Springer Netherlands, 250. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–007–5476–8.

Thornley, A. (1998). Institutional change and London’s urban policy agenda. The Annals of Regional Science, 32(1),

163–183. DOI: 10.1007/s001680050068.

Engel, J. S., Berbegal-Mirabent, J. & Piqué, J. M. (2018). The renaissance of the city as a cluster of innovation. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2018.1532777.

Webb, R., Bai, X., Smith, M. S., Costanza, R., Griggs, D., Moglia, M., … Thomson, G. (2017). Sustainable urban systems: Co-design and framing for transformation. Ambio, 47(1), 57–77. DOI: 10.1007/s13280–017–0934–6.

Lang, T. (2010). Urban Resilience and New Institutional Theory — A Happy Couple for Urban and Regional Studies? German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy, 15–24. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-642–12785–4_2.

Published

30.03.2020

How to Cite

Popov, E. V., & Semyachkov, K. A. (2020). Systematisation of Approaches to Assessing the Development of Smart Cities. Economy of Regions, 16(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-2

Issue

Section

Articles