Trends in Industrial Specialization and Development Dynamics in the Russian Regions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-6Keywords:
regional economy, industry, regional specialization, measurement of the level of specialization, concentration, agglomeration, agglomeration effect, location factor, Spearman's coefficient, economic growth, regional developmentAbstract
Industrial specialization is one of the main elements characterizing and systemizing the economy that in many ways defines the regional development’s level and dynamics. The study discusses the main features of industrial specialization in the context of the need to assess structural factors and pro spects for regional development. The research methodology is based on developing the concept of diversified space and involves the analysis of statistical data reflecting the nature and trends of industrial development in the regions. Regional specialization is characterized as a separate phenomenon, assessed in relationship with close categories. Additionally, the paper specifies the place of industrial specialization among the factors of regional development. I describe the features and limitations of medium-term research of industrial specialization in Russian conditions. Then I assess the level and medium-term trends in the industrial specialization of the Russian regions. Industrial specialization is measured for the period from 2005 to 2017 based on official statistical data on the employment aggregated by sector and region. I applied a statistical indicator based on the adapted Spearman’s coefficient for studying the main characteristics of the relationship between specialization and the regional development’s parameters. The conducted analysis has identified the stable groups of regions with significant trends in the industrial specialization’s level. The relationship between the growth rates of regional manufacturing industry, the level and dynamics of relative specialization in various specifications has been empirically studied. In the majority of the Russian regions, the level of relative specialization was positively related with the dynamics of industrial development. Growing industrial specialization could help achieve faster and more stable economic growth. The results can be used in theoretical and empirical studies of regional development, including investment policy. The ambiguity of some results substantiates the directions for further research of various features of specialization in Russian regions: the multidimensionality of measurement, directions of evolution depending on regional potential, spatial and temporal continuity of specialization.References
Minakir, P. A. (2011). Prostranstvennye effekty v ekonomike i upravlenii [Spatial effects in economics and manage- ment]. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and management], 5(67), 22–33. (In Russ.)
Capello, R. (2008). Regional economics in its fifties: recent theoretical directions and future challenges. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(4), 747–767.
Biehl, D. (1991). The role of infrastructure in regional development. In: R. W. Vickerman (Ed.), Infrastructure and Regional Development (pp. 3–9). London: Pion Limited.
Rosenthal, S. S. & Strange, W. C. (2001). The Determinants of Agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 191–229.
Puga, D. (2010). The Magnitude and Causes of Agglomeration Economies. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 203–219.
Overman, H. G. & Puga, D. (2009). Labour Pooling as a Source of Agglomeration: An Empirical Investigation. The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 181–198.
Combes, P. P. & Duranton, G. (2006). Labour Pooling, labour poaching, and spatial clustering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 1–28.
Davidson, N. B., Drapkin, I. M., Mariev, O. S. & Pushkaryov, A. A. (2016). Osobennosti otsenki vliyaniya prostran- stvennoy kontsentratsii na proizvoditelnost rossiyskikh kompaniy [Estimation of the spatial concentration influence on en- terprise performance in Russia]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian journal of economic theory], 4, 104–113. (In Russ.)
Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Schleifer, A. (2004). Do Institutions Cause Growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271–303.
Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of powers, elites and institutions. American Economic Review, 9, 267–293.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131–165.
Kolomak, Е. A. (2014). Prostranstvennaya kontsentratsiya ekonomicheskoy aktivnosti v Rossii [Spatial Concentration of Economic Activity in Russia]. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 4, 82–99. (In Russ.)
Rastvortseva, S. N. (2018). Ekonomicheskaya aktivnost regionov Rossii [Economic activity in Russian re- gions]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 11(1), 84–99. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.1.55.6 (In Russ.)
Aiginger, K. & Davies, D. (2004). Industrial specialization and geographical concentration: Two sides of the same coin? Not for the EU. Journal of Applied Economics, 7(2), 231–248.
Dalum, B., Laursen, K. & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD Export Specialization Patterns: De- specialization and “Stickiness”. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3), 423–43.
Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2005). A spatial theory of trade. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1464–1491.
Aiginger, K. & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006). Specialization and concentration: a note on theory and evidence. Empirica, 33, 255–266.
Hallet, M. (2002). Regional Specialization and Concertation in the EU. In: J. R. Cuadrado-Roura, M. Parellada (Eds.), Regional Convergence in the European Union. Facts, Prospects and Policies (pp. 53–76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Vorob’ev, P. V., Davidson, N. B., Kislyak, N. V., Kuznecov, P. D. (2014). Raznoobrazie i kontsentratsiya otrasley v rossiyskikh gorodakh kak faktory ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti [Industrial diversity and concentration in the Russian cities as factors of economic efficiency]. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: ekonomika i upravlenie [Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management], 6, 4–18. (In Russ.)
Kolomak, Е. A. (2010). Prostranstvennye eksternalii kak resurs ekonomicheskogo rosta [Spatial externalities as a source of economic growth]. Region: Ekonomika i sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology], 4, 73–87. (In Russ.)
Ezcurra, R., Pascual, P. & Rapun, M. (2006). Regional Specialization in the European Union. Regional Studies, 40(6), 601–616.
Kemeny, T. & Storper, M. (2015). Is specialization good for regional economic development? Regional Studies, 49(6), 1003–1018. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.899691.
Storper, M. (2010). Why does a city grow? Specialisation, human capital or institutions? Urban Studies, 10(47), 2027–2050.
Rosenthal, S. & Strange, W. (2003). Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2(85), 377–393.
Shuai, X. (2013). Will specialization continue forever? A case study of interactions between industry specialization and diversity. The Annals of Regional Science, 1(50), 1–24.
Marelli, E. (2006). Specialization and Convergence of European Regions. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2, 149–178.
Davis, R. D. & Weinstein, D. E. (2002). Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1269–1289.
Cantwell, J. (Ed.). (2004). Globalization and the location of firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 560.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Igor Vladimirovich Grebenkin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
