The Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Compliance with Circular Economy Criteria: the Case of Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-4Keywords:
MSW management, circular economy, business models, waste hierarchy, waste prevention, waste utilisation, recycling, landfilling, incentive-compatible regulations, producer responsibility organisation (PRO), extended producer responsibility (EPR)Abstract
In Russia, increasing amounts of municipal solid waste (MSW) accompanied by environmental degradation have recently led to changes in legislation. Their main goal is to reduce landfilling, to increase utilisation, to introduce the principle of extended producer responsibility (EPR). These are first steps towards a circular economy. The main purpose of the paper is to study how to improve the efficiency of Russian MSW management using circular economy criteria. The study relies on methods such as systemic analysis and syn- thesis, comparison and generalisation, stakeholder analysis. The detailed analysis of current MSW management system in Russia showed contradictions between its participants regarding the distribution of material waste streams and financing, which leads to difficulties in EPR principle implementation and to possible problems in achieving the goals of the entire MSW management system. According to its current design, recy- cling receives maximum government support, opposite to reuse and prevention of waste: companies involved in these activities are still outside the scope of MSW management system, and the authors recommend con- sidering their legislative inclusion in it. The critical analysis of Russia’s EPR design compared with EU experience showed problems such as low environmental fees, low utilisation standards and the lack of households’ involvement, which makes EPR design inefficient. The current regulations may help divert some waste from landfills to utilisation and recycling, but beyond that the incentives do not yet correspond to those required for implementing the EPR principle and a circular economy. Consequently, the paper provides recommendations for amending this, which can be used by decision makers at the federal level to improve MSW manage- ment system and increase its efficiency.
References
Larionov, A. & Ecorem, N. V. (2012). MSW management: opportunities for Russia. Summary of key findings. Washington D.C.: IFC, World Bank Group [Electronic source] https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_con-tent/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/publications_report_russia-solidwaste (Date of access: 10.12.2019).
Korobova, N., Larionov, A., Michelsen, J. D., Pulyayev, M., Ivanovskyy, S., Turilova, K. & Kuznetsova, M. (2014). Waste in Russia: garbage or valuable resource. Washington D.C.: IFC, World Bank Group [Electronic source] http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/702251549554831489/pdf/Waste-in-Russia-Garbage-or-Valuable-Resource.pdf (Date of access: 01.12.2019).
Ermolaeva, Y. V. (2018). Problems of institutionalization of waste management in Russia. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 7, 261-266.
Ermolaeva, Y. V. (2019). Problems of modernization of the waste management sector in Russia: expert opinions. Revista Tecnologia e Societade, 15, 56-77.
Pearce, D. W. & Turner, R. K. (1989). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 243.
Heshmati, A. (2015). A review of the circular economy and its implementation. IZA Discussion Papers No. 9611. [Electronic source] http://ftp.iza.org/dp9611.pdf ((Date of access: 01.12.2019).
Antikainen, R., Lazarevic, D. & Seppälä, J. (2018) Circular economy: origins and future orientations. Lehmann H (ed.) Factor X. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, 32, 115-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50079-9_7
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017). Circular economy and curriculum development in higher education. [Electronic source] https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/EMF_HE-Curriculum-Brochure-03.10.17.pdf (Date of access: 01.12.2019).
OECD. Business Models for the Circular Economy: Opportunities and Challenges from a Policy Perspective (2018). Paris: OECD Publishing, 12.
Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531 (7595), 435-438.
Genovese, A, Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., Koh, S. C. L. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344-357.
Dumlao-Tan, M.I., Halog, A. (2017) Moving Towards a Circular Economy in Solid Waste Management: Concepts and Practices. In: Goel S. (eds) Advances in Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. Springer.
Iacovidou, E., Millward-Hopkins, J., Busch, J., Purnell, P., Velis, C. A., Hahladakis, J. N.,.. & Brown, A. (2017). A pathway to circular economy: Developing a conceptual framework for complex value assessment of resources recovered from waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1279-1288.
Sakai, SI, Yoshida, H., Hirai, Y., Asari, M., Takigami, H., Takahashi, S.,.. & Douvan, AR (2011). International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 13 (2), 86-102.
Van Ewijk, S., & Stegemann, J. A. (2016). Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput. Absolute Reductions in Material Throughput, Energy Use and Emissions, 132, 122-128. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.051.
Gharfalkar, M., Court, R., Campbell, C., Ali, Z., & Hillier, G. (2015). Analysis of waste hierarchy in the European waste directive 2008/98/EC. Waste Management, 39, 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.007
Pires, A., & Martinho, G. (2019). Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management. Waste Management, 95, 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.014.
Wiesmeth, H. & Häckl, D. (2011). How to successfully implement Extended Producer Responsibility: considerations from an economic point ofview. Waste Management & Research, 29, 891-901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X11413333.
Walls, M. (2006). Extended producer responsibility and product design: economic theory and selected case studies. Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future, Washington DC. [Electronic source] http://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-06- 08.html. (Date of access: 24.11.2019).
OECD. Extended Producer Responsibility: A Guidance Manual for Governments (2001). Paris: OECD Publishing, 164. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264189867-en.
Wiesmeth, H. & Häckl, D. (2016). Integrated environmental policy: a review of economic analysis. Waste Management & Research, 35, 332-345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16672319.
Bilitewski, B., Härdtle, G., & Marek, K. (1997). Waste Management. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-662-03382-1
BIO Intelligence Service. Review of the scope of the Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Final Report prepared for the European Commission - DG Environment (2014). Paris: BIO Intelligence Service, 116.
OECD. Extended producer responsibility: updated guidance for efficient waste management (2016). Paris: OECD Publishing, 292. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264256385-en.
Plastinina, I., Teslyuk, L., Dukmasova, N. & Pikalova, E. (2019). Implementation of circular economy principles in regional solid waste management: the case of Sverdlovskaya Oblast (Russian Federation). Resources, 8(2), 90. doi: https:// doi.org/10.3390/resources8020090.
Shabanova, M. A. (2019) Separate Waste Collection in Russia: the Level, Factors and Potential for Citizen Engagement. Mir Rossii, 28(3), 88-112.
Blokov, I. P. Okruzhayushchaya sreda i yeyo okhrana v Rossii. Izmeneniya za 25 let. Moscow: Sovet Grinpis, 422.
Gubnitsyn, A. The evolution of sharing services in Russia: on the road towards the circular economy model. AEB Business Quarterly, winter 2019/2020, 12-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Hans Wiesmeth, Natalia V. Starodubets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
