Characteristics of Economic Performance in former Soviet Countries: Lessons Learned from Last Two Decades
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-6Keywords:
determinants of growth, capital intensity, labour force, productivity comparison, economic performance, growth accounting, former Soviet Union, transition economies, point-in-time approach, market systemAbstract
This paper attempts to explore economic performance in countries of the former Soviet Union since their transition to a market system based on the World Bank data for the period from 1993 to 2016. The first part of the study is related to estimating proximate sources of economic growth within the standard growth accounting framework. Results indicate that under the period of study capital accumulation was the primary engine for growth in the post-Soviet region. Total factor productivity (TFP) growth rates were modest ranging from 1.15 % for Uzbekistan and 0.77 % for Belarus to -1.83 % for Turkmenistan and -1.20 % for Latvia accordingly. In the second part of the paper we analyse productivity level across all former Soviet republics by decomposing differences in output per worker into differences in capital intensity and productivity for the year 2016. Compared to Russia, a frontier for the analysis, nearly all former Soviet republics demonstrated a lower level of productivity. Some countries of the region such as Georgia, Kyrgyz Republic and Turkmenistan have extremely high capital intensity. Productivity in Russia was about 14 times higher than productivity in Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan. Despite the fact that more than two decades passed since the transition to a market system the Soviet legacy of aggregate production did not experience notable changes.
References
Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F. (2002). Growth in transition: what we know, what we don't, and what we should. Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (3), 793-836. doi: 10.1257/002205102760273797.
Rapacki, R., Prochniak, M. (2009). Economic growth accounting in twenty-seven transition countries, 19902003. Eastern European Economics, 47 (2), 69-112. doi: 10.2753/EEE0012-8775470205.
Izyumov, A., Vahaly, J. (2008). Old capital vs. new investment in post-Soviet economies: conceptual issues and estimates. Comparative Economic Studies, 50 (1), 79-110. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100237.
Iradian, G. (2009). What explains the rapid growth in transition economies? IMF Staff Papers, 56 (4), 811-851. doi: 10.1057/imfsp.2009.1.
Kaitila, V. (2016). GDP growth in Russia: different capital stock series and the terms of trade. Post-Communist Economies, 28 (2), 129-145. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2015.1124556.
Brock, G. (2010). Growth in Russia's federal districts, 1994-2003. Post-Communist Economies, 22 (1), 19-31. doi: 10.1080/14631370903525579.
Michaelides, P., Millios, J. (2009). TFP change, output gap and inflation in the Russian Federation (1994-2006). Journal of Economics and Business, 61 (4), 339-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2008.10.001.
Turganbayev, Y. (2016). Regional convergence in Kazakhstan. Post-Communist Economies, 28 (3), 314-334. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2016.1204745.
Turganbayev, Y. (2017). Total factor productivity convergence across the Kazakh regions. Post-Communist Economies, 29 (2), 182-197. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2016.1267975.
Hall, R.E., Jones, C.I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1), 83-116. doi: 10.1162/003355399555954.
Christensen, L. R., Cummings, D., Jorgenson, D. W. (1981). Relative productivity levels, 1947-1973: an international comparison. European Economic Review, 16 (1), 61-94. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(81)90049-0.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65-94. doi: 10.2307/1884513.
Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), 312-320. doi: 10.2307/1926047.
Jorgenson, D. W., Grilliches, Z. (1967). The Explanation of Productivity Change. The Review of Economic Studies, 34 (3), 249-283. doi: 10.2307/2296675.
Baily, M. N., Gordon, R. J., Nordhaus, W. D., Romer, D. (1988). The Productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1988 (2), 347-431. doi: 10.2307/2534534.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., Weil, D.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), 407-437. doi: 10.2307/2118477.
Barro, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 407-443. doi: 10.2307/2937943.
Alwyn. Y. (1995). The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 641-680. doi: 10.2307/2946695.
Jorgenson, D.W., Khuong, M.V. (2010). Potential growth of the world economy. Journal of Policy Modelling, 32 (5), 615-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.07.011.
Blanchard, O. (1998). The economics of post-communist transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164. doi: 10.1093/0198293992.001.0001.
Barro, R. J., Sala-i-Martin, X. I. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press, 672.
Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1008.
Hazans, M., Philips K. (2011). The Post-enlargement migration experience in the Baltic labour markets. IZA Discussion Paper, 5878. [Electronic Source] Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp5878.pdf/ (Date of access: 26.02.2019).
Jones, C. I., Vollrath, D. (2013). Introduction to economic growth (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 320.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Mirzobobo Yormirzoev, Firuza Yormirzoeva, Aleksei Gorodilov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
