Fiscal Decentralisation and Inequality in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-24Keywords:
fiscal decentralisation, vertical inequality, horizontal inequality, institutional quality, sub-national government, mixed method, fixed effects, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussion, IndonesiaAbstract
The study examined the effect of fiscal decentralisation on both vertical and horizontal inequality in 32 provinces of Indonesia in the period from 2005 to 2014 using several fixed effects (FE) estimations. Moreover, we assessed the mediating role of institutional quality in explaining the nexus between fiscal decentralisation and inequality. To complement the econometrics results, we conducted several semi-structured interviews (SSIs) based on expert judgement and focus group discussions (FGDs) among relevant stakeholders. This analysis focussed on the intergovernmental transfer policy designed and implemented at the sub-national government level. Such qualitative analysis started in the last week of March 2019 and ended in the first week of July 2019. The quantitative findings showed that there was a robust, positive, and significant relationship between fiscal decentralisation and vertical inequality when democracy was taken into account. Meanwhile, fiscal decentralisation was negatively correlated with horizontal inequality when the estimation included social capital. In addition, fiscal decentralisation appears to have a marginal impact on horizontal inequality when both democracy and the crime rate are considered in the full sample analysis. However, when we excluded provinces located in Java Island, the impact of fiscal decentralisation on horizontal inequality became clear. Regarding the qualitative aspect, the fieldwork results were consistent with the quantitative findings.
References
Sugiyanto, E., Digdowiseiso, K., Zulmasyhur & Setiawan, H. D. (2018). Fiscal Decentralisation and Routine Conflict in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(4), 961-969.
Murshed, S. M. & Tadjoeddin, M. Z. (2009). Revisiting the greed and grievance explanations for violent conflict. Journal of International Development, 21(1), 87-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1478.
Sepulveda, C. & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). The consequences of fiscal decentralisation on poverty and income equality. Environmental and Planning C: Government policy, 29(2), 321-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c1033r.
Lessmann, C. (2012). Fiscal decentralisation and regional disparity: Evidence from cross-section and panel data. Environment and Planning A, 41(10), 2455-2473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068 %2Fa41296.
Goerl, C. & Seiferling, M. (2014). Income Inequality, Fiscal Decentralisation and Transfer Dependency. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1464.pdf (Date of access: 07.08.2019).
Siddique, M. A. B., Wibowo, H. & Wu, Y. (2014). Fiscal Decentralisation and Inequality in Indonesia: 1999-2008. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2934/8c8457978d667e9d994117900fa7ff681905.pdf (Date of access: 09.08.2019).
Tadjoeddin, M. Z., Yumna, A., Gultom, S. E., Rakhmadi, M. F., Hidayat, M. F. & Suryahadi, A. (2016). Inequality and Stability in Democratic and Decentralized Indonesia. Retrieved from: http://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/ inequalitystability_eng_0.pdf (Date of access: 08.08.2019).
World Bank. (2003). Decentralizing Indonesia. Retrieved from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/ Resources/Decentralization/RPR-DecInd-June03.pdf (Date of access: 06.08.2019).
Green, K. (2005). Decentralisation and good governance. Retrieved from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18097/ (Date of access: 04.08.2019).
Brodjonegoro, B. (2003). The Indonesian Decentralisation After Law Revision: Toward a Better Future? Retrieved from: http://www.econ.hit-u.ac.jp/~kokyo/APPPsympo04/PDF-papers-nov/Indonesianpaper.pdf (Date of access: 05.08.2019).
World Bank. (2007). Spending for Development: Making the Most of Indonesia's New Opportunities. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/7816/387720REVISED01e0cover0PER01PUBLIC1.pd-f?sequence=1&isAllowed (Date of access: 06.08.2019).
Firman, T. (2013). Territorial Split (Pemekaran Daerah) in Decentralising Indonesia, 2000-2012: Local Development Drivers or Hindrance? Space and Polity, 17(2), 180-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2013.820373.
Sacchi, A. & Salotti, S. (2014). The Effects of Fiscal Decentralisation on Household Income Inequality: Some Empirical Evidence. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(2), 202-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2013.833343.
Bojanic, A. N. (2018). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on Growth, Inflation, and Inequality in the Americas. CEPAL Review, 124, 57-77. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43951/1/ RVI124_Bojanic.pdf (Date of access: 03.08.2019).
Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2008).What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x.
Grootaert, C. & van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Syntesis of Findings and Recommendation from the Social Capital Imitative. Retrieved from: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/ INTSOCIALCAPITAL/Resources/Social-Capital-Initiative-Working-Paper-Series/SCI-WPS-24.pdf (Date of access: 06.08.2019).
Stewart, F., Brown, G. & Mancini, L. (2005). Why Horizontal Inequalities Matter: Some Implications for Measurement. Retrieved from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/training/capacity-building-resources/basic-me-con-cepts-portuguese/workingpaper19.pdf (Date of access: 12.08.2019).
Ebel, R. & Yilmaz, S. (2002). Concept of Fiscal Decentralisation and Worldwide Overview. Retrieved from: http:// documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/716861468781761314/pdf/303460Concept0of0Fiscal0Ebel1Yilmaz.pdf (Date of access: 05.08.2019).
Calamai, L. (2009). The link between devolution and regional disparities: Evidence from Italian regions. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1129-1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068 %2Fa40282.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/257839.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 256.
Baltagi, B. H. & Hashem Pesaran, M. H. (2007). Heterogeneity and cross section dependence in panel data models: Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 229-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.955.
Panizza, U. (1999). On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 74(1), 97-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00020-1.
Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to "Difference"and "System" GMM in Stata. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.612.3134&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Date of access: 09.08.2019).
Stewart, F. (2010). Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 364.
Sonora, R. (2019). Income Inequality, Poverty, and the Rule of Law: Latin America vs the Rest of the World. Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/91512/1/MPRA_paper_91512.pdf (Date of access: 03.08.2019).
Scheve, K. & Stasavage, D. (2017). Wealth Inequality and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 451-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061014-101840.
Faguet, J. P. & Pöschl, C. (2015). Is Decentralisation Good for Development? Perspectives from Academics and Policy Makers. In: J.-P. Faguet, C. Pöschl (Eds.), Is Decentralisation Good for Development? Perspectives from Academics and Policy Makers (pp. 1-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Kumba Digdowiseiso, Eko Sugiyanto, Heru Dian Setiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
