Examining Regional Polycentricity: Does It Really Matter in Transitional Russia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-3Keywords:
polycentricity, spatial autocorrelation, employment density, economic development, social infrastructure, road infrastructureAbstract
In the normative agenda of European countries, polycentricity is considered a desirable spatial form for encouraging regional competitiveness and territorial cohesion. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russian regions have undergone various reforms aimed at reducing tremendous social-economic differentiation, but the results of applied strategic plans were moderate. According to the existing Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation, polycentric patterns are encouraged to increase the quality of economic space and its connectivity. Using statistical data from 2017 for 271 Russian municipalities, the research addresses the impact of socio-economic determinants and road infrastructure on the spatial structure. The Republic of Bashkortostan and six adjacent regions served as a case study. Conducted regression analysis identified key variables that influence polycentricity, upon which global and local Moran’s indexes were calculated to reveal the potential for intraregional cooperation. Research findings showed that polycentricity in its morphologic nature is positively determined by economic variables (namely, the value of shipped goods, performed works and services) and social infrastructure (the number of doctors per 10 000 inhabitants) while spatial autocorrelation is weak both within and beyond regional boundaries. The results may be used for formulating regional policies, infrastructure programmes, and spatial planning.References
Salvati, L., Carlucci, M., Grigoriadis, E. & Chelli, F. M. (2017). Uneven dispersion or adaptive polycentrism? Urban expansion, population dynamics and employment growth in an "ordinary" city. Review of Regional Research, 38(1), 1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10037-017-0115-x.
Knaap, E., Ding, C., Niu, Y. & Mishra, S. (2015). Polycentrism as a sustainable development strategy: empirical analysis from the state of Maryland. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(1), 73-92. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2015.1029509.
Murakami, J. & Chang, Z. (2018). Polycentric development under public leasehold: A spatial analysis of commercial land use rights. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 71, 25-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.05.001.
Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use. Towards a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge: Massachusetts, 204.
Li, Y. & Liu, X. (2018). How did urban polycentricity and dispersion affect economic productivity? A case study of 306 Chinese cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 173, 51-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.007.
Kanai, J. M. & Schindler, S. (2018). Peri-urban promises of connectivity: Linking project-led polycentrism to the infrastructure scramble. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(1), 0308518X1876337. DOI: 10.1177/0308518x18763370.
Rauhut, D. & Komornicki, T. (2015). We Challenge of SGI Provision in Rural Areas. A paper prepared for the 55th European Congress of Regional Science International, 25-29 August 2015 in Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from: https://www. econstor.eu/handle/10419/124605 (Date of access: 13.03.2020).
Vasanen, A. (2012). Functional Polycentricity: Examining Metropolitan Spatial Structure through the Connectivity of Urban Sub-centres. Urban Studies, 49(16), 3627-3644. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012447000.
Dadashpoor, H., Afaghpoor, A. & Allan, A. (2015). A methodology to assess the spatial configuration of urban systems in Iran from an interaction perspective. GeoJournal, 82(1), 109-129. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-015-9671-1
Zhong, C., Schläpfer, M., Müller Arisona, S., Batty, M., Ratti, C. & Schmitt, G. (2016). Revealing centrality in the spatial structure of cities from human activity patterns. Urban Studies, 54(2), 437-455. DOI: 10.1177/0042098015601599.
Krehl, A. (2016). Urban subcentres in German city regions: Identification, understanding, comparison. Papers in Regional Science, 97, 79-104. DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12235.
Schmitt, P., Volgmann, K., Münter, A. & Mitchell, R. (2015). Unpacking polycentricity at the city-regional scale: Insights from Dusseldorf and Stockholm. European Journal of Spatial Development, 59, 1-26.
Zambon, I., Serra, P., Grigoriadis, E., Carlucci, M. & Salvati, L. (2017). Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth. Land Use Policy, 68, 365-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.landuse-pol.2017.07.063.
Davoudi, S. (2003). EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979-999. DOI: 10.1080/0965431032000146169.
Riguelle, F., Thomas, I. & Verhetsel, A. (2007). Measuring urban polycentrism: a European case study and its implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 193-215.
Aguilera, A. & Mignot, D. (2004). Urban Sprawl, polycentrism and commuting. A comparison of Seven French Urban Areas. Urban Public Economics Review, 1, 93-113.
Taubenböck, H., Standfuß, I., Wurm, M., Krehl, A. & Siedentop, S. (2017). Measuring morphological polycentricity - a comparative analysis of urban mass concentrations using remote sensing data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 42-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.005.
Parr, J. (2004). The Polycentric Urban Region: a Closer Inspection. Regional Studies, 38(3), 231-240.
Vasanen, A. (2013). Spatial Integration and Functional Balance in Polycentric Urban Systems: A Multi-Scalar Approach. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie [Journal of Economic & Social Geography], 104(4), 410-425. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12029.
Yang, L., Wang, Y., Bai, Q. & Han, S. (2018). Urban Form and Travel Patterns by Commuters: Comparative Case Study of Wuhan and Xi'an, China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(1), 05017014. DOI: 10.1061/(asce) up.1943-5444.0000417.
Hu, L., Sun, T. & Wang, L. (2018). Evolving urban spatial structure and commuting patterns: A case study of Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 11-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.007.
Meijers, E. (2008). Summing Small Cities Does Not Make a Large City: Polycentric Urban Regions and the Provision of Cultural, Leisure and Sports Amenities. Urban Studies, 45(11), 2323-2342. DOI: 10.1177/0042098008095870.
Brezzi, M. & Veneri, P. (2014). Assessing Polycentric Urban Systems in the OECD: Country, Regional and Metropolitan Perspectives. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1128-1145. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.905005.
Wen, H. & Tao, Y. (2015). Polycentric urban structure and housing price in the transitional China: Evidence from Hangzhou. Habitat International, 46, 138-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.006.
Minakir, P. A. (2016). e National Strategy of Spatial Development: Is It the Conscientious Delusion or Deliberate Simplification? Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 3, 7-15. (In Russ.)
Kurushina, E. V. & Petrov, M. B. (2018). Performance Criteria of Spatial Development Projects Based on Interregional Integration. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 14(1), 176-189. DOI: 10.17059/2018-1-14.
Veneri, P., & Burgalassi, D. (2012). Questioning Polycentric Development and its Effects. Issues of Definition and Measurement for the Italian NUTS-2 Regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 1017-1037.
Meijers, E. (2008). Summing Small Cities Does Not Make a Large City: Polycentric Urban Regions and the Provision of Cultural, Leisure and Sports Amenities. Urban Studies, 45(11), 2323-2342.
Moran, P. (1948). The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 10, 243-251.
Geary, R. (1954). The continuity ratio and statistical mapping. Пє Incorporated Statistician, 5, 115-145.
Anselin, L. (1990). Spatial Dependence and Spatial Structural Instability in Applied Regression Analysis. Journal of Regional science, 30, 185-207.
Milbert, A., Breuer, I. M., Rosik, P., Stepniak, M. & Velasco, X. (2013). Accessibility of Services of General Interest in Europe. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 7(Special Issue June), 37-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dina Kh. Krasnoselskaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
