Market and Regulatory Coefficients for Determining the Rent for Public Land in Regions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-23Keywords:
market coefficient, considering the type of permitted use of land (K), regulatory coefficient, considering the category of land users (K1), land use, rent, public land, municipalities, Altai Krai, Pervomaysky District, local councils, territorial economicsAbstract
As opposed to international studies, Russian scientists apply multifactorial models with specific coefficients to determine the rent for public lands. This research analyses and summarises the existing theoretical and normative approaches to coefficient calculation covered by domestic literature. We examine two types of coefficients: permitted use of land (K) and categories of land users (K1). Based on the property valuation theory (income and comparative approaches), we demonstrated problems and disadvantages of the methods currently used to determine K and K1 coefficients. Then, using the economic contract theory, we identified market and non-market (hybrid and hierarchical) regulation mechanisms and distinguished K and K1 coefficients. Institutional differences of these indicators were theoretically substantiated. As a result, we developed economic algorithms for calculating market (K) and regulatory (K1) coefficients that take into account both types of permitted use of land (for K) and categories of land users (for K) by considering preferences and restrictions in the field. The elaborated methodology was tested by performing complex calculations, which allowed us to obtain the values of K and K1 coefficients for 18 local councils located in Pervomaysky District of Altai Krai for 112 types of permitted use of land. Proposed methodological recommendations can be applied for developing municipal programmes in Russia and abroad to increase the effectiveness and transparency of public land rent.References
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 279. DOI: 10.1007/978–3-531–90400–9_93.
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Rodney, L. J. (1994). Lease Incentives and Effective Rents: A Decapitalization Model. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 12(2), 21–42. DOI: 10.1108/14635789410055868.
Erma, B., Yufeng, Z., Mingkai, Y. & Jiaxing, S. (2018). Study of the Russian land market. Nature of Inner Asia, 1(6), 77–85. DOI: 10.18101/2542–0623–2018–1-77–85.
Slangen, L. & Polman, N. (2008). Land lease contracts: properties and the value of bundles of property rights. NJAS — Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 55(4), 397–412. DOI: 10.1016/S1573–5214(08)80028–0.
Ciaian, P. & Kancs, A. (2012). The capitalization of area payments into farmland rents: micro evidence from the new EU member states. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 60(4), 517–540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744–7976.2012.01256.x.
Featherstone, A. M. & Baker, T. G. (1988). Effects of reduced price and income supports on farmland rent and value. North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10(2), 177–189. DOI: 10.1093/aepp/10.2.177.
Kilian, S., Antón, J., Salhofer, K. & Röder, N. (2012). Impacts of 2003 CAP reform on land rental prices and capitalization. Land use policy, 29(4), 789–797. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.12.004.
Yao, Y. (2000). The Development of the Land Lease Market in Rural China. Land Economics, 76(2), 252–266. DOI: 10.2307/3147227.
Mani, G. (2016). Model Agricultural Land Leasing Act, 2016: Some Observations. Economic&PoliticalWeekly, 51(42). Retrieved from: https://www.epw.in/journal/2016/42/web-exclusives/model-agricultural-land-leasing-act-2016-some-observations.html (Date of access: 26.08.2019).
Graubner, M. (2018). Lost in space? The effect of direct payments on land rental prices. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45(2), 143–171. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbx027.
Dasgupta, S., Knight, T. O. & Love, H. A. (1999). Evolution of Agricultural Land Leasing Models: A Survey of the Literature. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 21(1), 148–176. DOI: 10.2307/1349978.
Hüttel, S., Ritter, M., Esaulov, V. & Odening, M. (2016). Is there a term structure in land lease rates? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(1), 165–187. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbv010.
Yang, Z., Ren, R., Liu, H. & Zhang, H. (2014). Land leasing and local government behaviour in China: Evidence from Beijing. Urban Studies, 52(5), 841–856.DOI: 10.1177/0042098014529342.
NITI Aayog. (2016). Report of the Expert Committee on Land Leasing, Government of India. New Delhi, 59.
16. Garmanov, V. V. & Terleev, V. V. (2017). Fundamentals of methodology of determination of rents for land use. Vestnik fakulteta zemleustroystva Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 3, 8–10. (In Russ.)
Grigorieva, E. A. (2011). Development of the financial mechanism of formation by the local organs of the authority of lease pay for the municipal earth on the example of the Orenburg area. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: theory and practice], 20(203), 67–72. (In Russ.)
Grigorieva, E. A. & Pakhnovskaya, N. M. (2015). Methodological support for calculating rental payments for the use of certain types of land located on the territory of municipalities. Evraziyskiy Soyuz Uchenykh [Eurasian Union of Scientists], 4(13), 121–124. (In Russ.)
Pakhnovsky, N. M. & Grigorieva, E.A. (2011). Development of the technique of definition of rent payments for the municipal ground areas, state ownership on which it is not differentiated. Finansy i kredit [Finance and Credit], 15(447), 59–65. (In Russ.)
Penkin, A. A., Zhichkin, K. A. & Guryanov, A. V. (2013). Results of the inventory estimates for agricultural land Samara region. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v RF [Property relations in the Russian Federation], 9(144), 50–59. (In Russ.)
Ershova, E. V. & Kolbneva, E. Yu. (2016). Forecasting of rent value for municipally owned land. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Vestnik of Voronezh State Agrarian University], 1(48), 276–280. DOI: 10.17238/issn2071–2243.2016.1.276. (In Russ.)
Obukhov, D. A. (2012). The rent for lands of agricultural purpose in municipalities (on the example of municipalities of the Ivanovo area). Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v RF [Property relations in the Russian Federation], 12, 95–103. (In Russ.)
Patskalev, A. F. & Shlykov, V. V. (2007). Technical guidance on the determination of rental value for land of recreational units located in protected national parks — a proposal. Voprosy otsenki [The Appraisal Issues], 4, 42–49. (In Russ.)
Topal, E. G. (2017). Economic justification of the rental rate for land with varying cadastral value at the regional level. Regionalnaya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal [Regional Economics and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal], 4(52), 1–21. Retrieved from: https://eee-region.ru/article/5203/ (Date of access: 26.08.2019). (In Russ.)
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press. New York, 429.
Menard, C. (2005). Organization Theory: A Variety of Agreements in a Developed Market Economy. In: A. Oleynik (Ed.), Institutsionalnaya ekonomika [Institutional economy] (pp. 191–241). M.: INFRA-M. (In Russ.)
Leifer, L. A. & Krainikova, T. V. (2017). Spravochnik otsenshchika nedvizhimosti. 2017. Korrektiruyushchie koeffitsienty dlya otsenki zemelnykh uchastkov: tablitsy, grafiki, gistogrammy [Directory of real estate appraiser. 2017. Correction factors for the assessment of land: tables, graphs, histograms]. Nizhny Novgorod: Volga Center for Methodological and Information Support of Assessment, 221. (In Russ.)
Yaskevich, E. E. (2006). Approaches to the concept of land value. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v RF [Property relations in the Russian Federation], 3(54), 75–89. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ruslan A. Samsonov, Sergey N. Bocharov, Vitalii V. Mishchenko, Mikhail Yu. Kobrin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
