Система измерений устойчивости социально-экономического развития стран ЕАЭС
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-18Keywords:
Eurasian Space, assessment of sustainable development, macroeconomic indicators, GDP dynamics, technological development, social sphere, quality of life, poverty, demographic development, fertilityAbstract
Whether applying to individual countries or unions, the comparability of statistical indicators and their compliance with contemporary international initiatives is a serious problem. In particular, analysis of the macroeconomic indicators used for assessing the sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries has shown that they do not reflect the actual situation. In this regard, the creation of a unified system of indicators for determining the socio-economic sustainability of EAEU member states - as well as the EAEU as a whole - becomes an urgent task. Therefore, the present study aims to refine the system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space and develop recommendations for the selection of key parameters. By comparing socio-economic sustainability indicators published by international organisations (UNECE, OECD, Eurostat, CIS Statistical Committee) in the context of the development strategies of individual EAEU countries and the Union as a whole, the authors distinguish between basic and extended indicator types. Basic indicators comprise: the annual consolidated budget deficit; general government debt; annualised inflation rate; contribution of high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries to gross domestic product (GDP); contribution of innovative goods and services to total industrial exports; growth index of the proportion of reconstruction and modernisation investment to total capital investment; fertility rate; life expectancy at birth; poverty rate. Extended indicators include: GDP; economic growth; main international trade; external and national balance of payments; social. The applicability and relevance of the proposed system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space is confirmed by statistical analysis of EAEU member state data (including correlation analysis). The results showed that the presented system of indicators reflects the actual development of the EAEU countries, contributing to informed decision-making both at the level of the EAEU member states and at the level of the Union as a whole.References
Klimenko, A. V., Korolev, V. A., Dvinskikh, D. Yu., Slastikhina I. Yu. & Rychkova N. A. (2016). Aktualnyy opyt zarubezhnykh stran po razvitiyu gosudarstvennykh sistem strategicheskogo planirovaniya. Ch. 2 [Actual experience of foreign countries in the development of state systems of strategic planning. Part 2]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 40. (In Russ.)
Rybakovsky, L. L. Demograficheskoe razvitie Rossii v XXI veke [Demographic development of Russia in the XXI century]. Retrieved from: http://rybakovsky.ru/demografia1a1.html (Date of access: 01.12.2021). (In Russ.)
Ivanov, V. V. (2015). Innovatsionnaya paradigma XXI. 2-e izd.: monografiya [Innovation paradigm XXI. 2nd ed.: monograph]. Moscow: Nauka, 383. (In Russ.)
Sorokin, D. Ye. (2001). Russian Political Economic Thought: Basic Features and Traditions. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2, 18–21. (In Russ.)
Isakov, V. B. (2018). The right to of analytics. Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast [Citizen. Elections. Authority], 4, 116–135. Retrieved from: http://www.rcoit.ru/upload/iblock/a77/GVV2018_4_p116–135.pdf (Date of access: 05.02.2021). (In Russ.)
Polterovich, V. M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy ekonomiki, 12, 77–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2018–12–77–102. (In Russ.)
Kuranov, G. O. (2019). Measuring the Quality of Economic Growth. Voprosy statistiki, 26(7), 5–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34023/2313–6383–2019–26–7–5–19. (In Russ.)
Ivanov, V. V. (2017). Global humanitarian and technological revolution: background and perspectives. Innovatsii [Innovations], 6, 3–8. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/globalnaya-gumanitarno-tehnologicheskaya-revolyutsiya-predposylki-i-perspektivy/viewer (Date of access: 05.02.2021). (In Russ.)
Aganbegyan, A. G., Klepach, A. N., Porfiryev, B. N., Uzyakov, M. N. & Shirov, A. A. (2020). Post-pandemic recovery: the Russian economy and the transition to sustainable social and economic development. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 6, 18–26. DOI: 10.47711 / 0868–6351–183–18–26. (In Russ.)
Ageev, A. I. & Putilov, A. V. (2020). Humanitarian and technological revolution: experience and challenges of engineering evolution. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies], 2(168), 54–63. DOI: 10.33917 / es-2.168.2020.54–63. (In Russ.)
Lenchuk, E. B. (2021). Scientific and technological development as a factor in accelerating economic growth in Russia. Nauchnye trudy Volnogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia], 228(2), 126–135. DOI: 10.38197/2072–2060–2020–222–2–126–134. (In Russ.)
Bartov, O. B. & Tretyakova, E. A. (2021). Meso-level Model of the Effect of Information and Communication Resources on the Economic Development of Russian Regions. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 17(2), 402–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021–2–4. (In Russ.)
Matei, A. & Savulescu, C. (2012). Towards Sustainable Economy through Information and Communication Technologies Development: Case of the EU. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 2. DOI: 10.9770/jssi.2012.2.2 (1).
Zinilli, A. & De Marchi, M. (2020). Value-added in high technology and industrial basic research: A weighted network observing the trade of high-tech goods. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 10(4), 398–418. DOI: 10.1504/IJCEE.2020.110778.
Castro, C. & Dieguez, T. (2016). The impact of Scientific Research and Development on economic growth — Comparative analysis between Portugal and EU15. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5, 56–61. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305609917_The_impact_of_Scientific_Research_and_Development_on_economic_growth-Comparative_analysis_between_Portugal_and_EU15 (Date of access: 22.02.2021).
Dresch, S. & Pelc, K. (1989). Knowledge Centers, Technological Innovations and Regional Economic Growth. Springer Netherlands, 228. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–015–7835–6_5.
Ji Hong & Liang Ting (2021). The Influence of Scientific and Technological Innovation in Jiangxi Province’s Universities on Regional Economic Growth. DEStech Transactions on Economics, Business and Management. DOI: 10.12783/dtem/eeim2020/35190.
Gospodarik, C. G. & Kovalev, M. M. (2020). Belarus in the EAEU: problems and perspectives of economic growth. Journal of the Belaru-sian State University. Economics, 1, 86–95. Retrieved from: https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/economy/article/view/2748 (Date of access: 01.15.2021).
Glazyev, S. Yu. & Lokosov, V. V. (2012). Assessment of the critical threshold values of the indicators of the state of Russian society and their use in the socio-economic development management. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny. Fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast], 4(22), 22–41. Retrieved from: http://esc.vscc.ac.ru/article/317/full (Date of access: 10.01.2021). (In Russ.)
Kuranov, G. O. (2018). Questions of technique used for short-term estimates and macroeconomic forecasting. Voprosy statistiki, 25(2), 3–24. Retrieved from: https://voprstat.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/626 (Date of access: 01.15.2021). (In Russ.)
Diewert, W. E. (1999). Axiomatic and economic approaches to international comparisons. In: A. Heston, R. E. Lipsey (Eds.), International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices (pp. 13–107). University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from: https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/international-and-interarea-comparisons-income-output-and-prices (Date of access: 15.01.2021).
Kravis, I. B., Heston, A. & Summers, R. (1978). International comparisons of real product and purchasing power. The World Bank. Retrieved from: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/499951468180561445/pdf/11907000Intern0and0purchasing0power.pdf (Date of access: 17.01.2021).
Ageev, A. A. & Zolotareva, O. A. (2019). Five years of Eurasian integration: statistical analysis of key economic results. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies], 8(166), 48–57. Retrieved from: http://www.inesnet.ru/article/pyatiletie-evrazijskoj-integracii-statisticheskij-analiz-osnovnyx-ekonomicheskix-rezultatov. DOI: 10.33917/es-8.166.2019.48–57 (date of access: 10.01.2021). (In Russ.)
Akaev, A. A., Davydova, O. I., Malkov, A. S. & Shulgin, S. G. (2019). Simulation of the Prospective Trade and Transport Corridors within the Framework of the «One Belt, One Road» Project. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15(4), 981–995. Retrieved from: https://economyofregion.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/02_akaev.pdf (Date of access: 01.10.2021) (In Russ.)
Ricardo, D. (1951). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Volume I. Cambridge University Press, 135.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Рязанцев Сергей Васильевич, Ростовская Тамара Керимовна, Золотарева Ольга Анатольевна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
