Interregional Mobility Patterns of Russian Scientists and Their Willingness to Move in the Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-13Abstract
Mobility of highly skilled personnel is closely related to the issue of human capital distribution, determining innovative development prospects of various regions and countries. The present study focuses on intra-Russian interregional mobility, in particular, the movement of scientists between different cities and constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Based on the questionnaire survey of 1880 Russian researchers, we examined the actual movements of scientists (to receive education and gain work experience in other regions and countries) and their attitude to mobility (willingness to move in the future to participate in interesting projects and/or work expecting satisfying remuneration). Analysis of mobility patterns of these scientists revealed the characteristics of Russian researchers willing to move to small towns. Interregional migration occurs mostly at the time of receiving education or immediately afterwards. At later career stages, the majority of researchers prefer to work in one place for long periods of time. Scientists who already had an interregional mobility experience are more likely to consider moving in the future since they have an attitude to mobility. A certain category of researchers is willing to relocate abroad as well as to major and small Russian cities. Scientists unwilling to move to small towns are concerned about their professional growth, difficulties for the family, a different lifestyle, and a change in professional and personal social networks. Thus, in order to develop regional research and education centres and stimulate intra-Russian academic mobility, relevant programmes and measures should take these aspects into account.
References
Ackers, L. & Oliver, L. (2007). From flexicurity to flexsecquality? The impact of the fixed-term contract provisions on employment in science research. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(1), 53–79. DOI: doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020–8825370103.
Ackers, L. (2004). Managing relationships in peripatetic careers: Scientific mobility in the European Union. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27(3), 189–201. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2004.03.001.
Ackers, L. (2005). Moving People and Knowledge: Scientific Mobility in the European Union. International Migration, 43(5), 99–131. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2435.2005.00343.x.
Aman, V. (2018). A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists. Scientometrics, 117(1), 227–247. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11192–018–2864-x.
Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. (2019). Advanced introduction to regional innovation systems. Glos, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, 160.
Bathelt, H., Kogler, D. F. & Munro, A. K. (2010). A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development. Technovation, 30(9–10), 519–532. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.04.003.
Blachford, D. R. & Zhang, B. (2014). Rethinking international migration of human capital and brain circulation: The case of Chinese-Canadian academics. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(3), 202–222. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1028315312474315.
Bochko, V. S. (2019). The Scientific and Research Forces of Society and Their Development in the Regions. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15(3), 644–658. DOI: doi.org/10.17059/2019–3-2. (In Russ.)
Bröckling, U. (2015). The entrepreneurial self: Fabricating a new type of subject. London: Sage, 256.
Cañibano, C., Otamendi, F. J. & Solís, F. (2011). International temporary mobility of researchers: a cross-discipline study. Scientometrics, 89(2), 653–675. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11192–011–0462–2.
Cloke, P. & Thrift, N. (1990). Class and Change in Rural Britain. In: T. Marsden, P. Lowe, S. Whatmore (Eds.), Rural Restructuring (pp. 165–181). London: Fulton.
Dezhina, I. G. (2014). Intersectoral Mobility of the Scientific Staff — Global Trends and Russian Peculiarities. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipalnogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues], 3, 30–48. (In Russ.)
Dickson, D. (2003). Mitigating the brain drain is a moral necessity. Science and development network. Retrieved from: https://www.scidev.net/global/migration/editorials/mitigating-the-brain-drain-is-a-moral-necessity.html (Date of access: 28.01.2022).
Drucker, J. & Goldstein, H. (2007). Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches. International regional science review, 30(1), 20–46. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0160017606296731.
Dubois, P., Rochet, J. C. & Schlenker, J. M. (2014). Productivity and mobility in academic research: evidence from mathematicians. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1669–1701. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11192–013–1112–7.
Dyachenko, E. L. & Kotsemir, M.N. (2018). Territorial centralization of science. Institut statisticheskikh issledovaniy i ekonomiki znaniy NIU VSHE. Nauka, tekhnologii, innovatsii [HSE Bulletin «Science, Technology, Innovation»], 84. Retrieved from: https://issek.hse.ru/news/217837831.html (Date of access: 28.01.2022). (In Russ.)
Dyachenko, E. L. (2017). Internal migration of scientists in Russia and the USA: the case of physicists. Scientometrics, 113(1), 105–122. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11192–017–2478–8.
Faggian, A. & McCann, P. (2009). Human capital and regional development. In: R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 133–151). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Horta, H. & Yudkevich, M. M. (2016). The role of academic inbreeding in developing higher education systems: Challenges and possible solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113(B), 363–372. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.039.
Hunt, J. & Gauthier-Loiselle, M. (2010). How much does immigration boost innovation? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 31–56. DOI: doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.2.31.
Jons, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000. Global Networks, 9(3), 315–338. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1471–0374.2009.00256.x.
Karachurina, L. & Mkrtchyan, N. (2018). Age-specific net migration patterns in the municipal formations of Russia. GeoJournal, 83(1), 119–136. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10708–016–9757–4.
Kashnitsky, I. S., Mkrtchyan, N. V. & Leshukov, O. V. (2016) Interregional Migration of Youths in Russia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Demographic Statistics. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies. Moscow], 3, 169–203. DOI: doi.org/10.17323/1814–9545–2016–3-169–203. (In Russ.)
Kato, M. & Ando, A. (2017). National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 110(2), 673–694. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s11192–016–2183-z.
Koksharov, V. A. & Agarkov, G. A. (2018). International Scientific Migration: Progress or a Threat to Russia’s Scientific and Technological Security. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 14(1), 243–252. DOI: doi.org/10.17059/2018–1–19. (In Russ.)
Krieger, H. & Maître, B. (2006). Migration Trends in an Enlarging European Union. Turkish Studies, 7(1), 45–66. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/14683840500520584.
Krieger, H. (2004). Migration trends in an enlarged Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 110.
Kuprina, T. V., Minasyan, S. M. & Tsaturyan, A. M. (2019). Modelling the Invariants of Academic Migration Influencing the Territory’s Socio-Economic Indicators. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15(3), 749–762. DOI: doi.org/10.17059/2019–3-10. (In Russ.)
Laudel, G. (2003). Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? Scientometrics, 57(2), 215–237. DOI: doi.org/10.1023/a:1024137718393.
Lazzeroni, M. & Piccaluga, A. (2015). Beyond “Town and Gown”: The Role of the University in Small and Medium-Sized Cities. Industry and Higher Education, 29(1), 11–23. DOI: doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0241.
Martin-Rovet, D. (2003). Opportunities for outstanding young scientists in Europe to create an independent research team. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation, 12.
Misu, T. & Horoiwa, A. (2016). Domestic and International Destinations of Japan’s Doctorate Holders. In: L. Gokhberg, N. Shmatko, L. Auriol (Eds.), The Science and Technology Labor Force. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies (pp. 291–316). Cham: Springer.
Mitchell, C. J. (2004). Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(1), 15–34. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0743–0167(03)00031–7.
Nefedova, T. G., Nikolaeva, U. G. & Pokrovsky, N. Ye. (2016). Intelligentsia in the space of non-urban Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 12, 52–61. (In Russ.)
Paniagua, A. (2002). Counterurbanisation and New Social Class in Rural Spain: The Environmental and Rural Dimension Revisited. The Scottish Geographical Magazine, 118(1), 1–18. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/00369220218737133.
Puustinen-Hopper, K. (2004). Mobile minds. Survey of foreign PhD students and researchers in Finland. Helsinki: Academy of Finland, 43.
Shmatko, N. A. & Volkova, G. L. (2017). Mobility and Career Opportunities of Researchers on the Labour Market. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 208(1), 35–46. (In Russ.)
Stretenova, N. (2003). Scientific mobility and ‘brain drain’ issues in the higher education sector in Bulgaria. CSLPE Research Report, No. 2, 28.
Trippl, M. & Maier, G. (2011). Knowledge Spillover Agents and Regional Development. In: P. Nijkamp, I. Siedschlag (Eds.), Innovation, Growth and Competitiveness. Advances in Spatial Science (The Regional Science Series) (pp. 91–111). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/978–3-642–14965–8_5.
Trippl, M. (2013). Scientific mobility and knowledge transfer at the interregional and intraregional level. Regional Studies, 47(10), 1653–1667. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.549119.
Vakulenko, E. & Mkrtchyan, N. (2020). Factors of Interregional Migration in Russia Disaggregated by Age. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 13, 609–630. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s12061–019–09320–8.
van de Sande, D., Ackers, H. L. & Gill B. (2005). Impact Assessment of the Marie Curie Fellowships under the 4th and 5th Framework Programmes of Research and Technological Development of the EU (1994–2002). Retrieved from: https://clck.ru/3RahV5 (Date of access: 28.01.2022).
Von Reichert, C., Cromartie, J. B. & Arthun, R. O. (2014). Impacts of Return Migration on Rural US Communities. Rural Sociology, 79(2), 200–226. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12024.
White, P. (1990). Labour Migration and Counterurbanisation in France. In: J. Johnson, J. Salt (Eds.), Labour Migration: The Internal Geographical Mobility of Labour in the Developed World (pp. 99–114). London: David Fulton Publishers.
Zborovsky, G. E. & Ambarova, P. A. (2019). The Dream of Quality Education: Contradictions in the Development of Educational Communities in Russian Universities. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 28(2), 98–124. DOI: doi.org/10.17323/1811–038X-2019–28–2-98–124. (In Russ.)
Zvyagintsev, V. I. & Neuvazhaeva M. A. (2015). Migration from Urban to Rural Areas: the Phenomenon of “Counter-urbanisation” in Modern Russia. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 24(1), 101–135. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Economy of Regions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
