Identification of Industrial and Innovative Development Models of Regional Economic Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-6Abstract
New industrialisation challenges, turbulent economic environment and opening market niches change the structure of competitiveness factors and determine the innovativeness of industrial development. In the current context, it is necessary to deepen the analysis of industrialisation and innovation performance of regions. Therefore, this study aims to identify industrial and innovative development models present in Russian regions. To this end, we propose a methodology based on assessing the localisation coefficients of both regional industrialisation and innovation performance. Calculation of these indicators resulted in the creation of four models: Model 1 (low industrial development and low innovation performance), Model 2 (low industrial development and high innovation performance), Model 3 (high industrial development and high innovation performance), Model 4 (high industrial development and low innovation performance). The classification of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation according to the industrial and innovative development model shows that more than 40 % of regions use Model 1 and about 12 % of territories use Model 2. Simultaneously, approximately 27 % of regions (including Tula, Lipetsk, Chelyabinsk, Vladimir oblasts, Republic of Bashkortostan) chose Model 3, which most fully meets the new industrialisation challenges. The high stability of this disproportionate structure indicates the absence of positive dynamics and poor balance of industrial and innovation policy measures in most Russian regions in the period 2015–2019. The study results can be used to create an alternative ranking of innovative development of regions. Further research can apply these findings to assess the efficiency of regional industrial and innovation policies.
References
Doroshenko, Yu. A., Starikova, M. S., Somina, I. V. & Malykhina, I. O. (2019). Increasing the Efficiency of High-tech Companies Based on Interactions with Entities of the Innovative Environment. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15(4), 1279–1293. DOI: 10.17059/2019–4-24. (In Russ.)
Etzioni, A. (1983). Reindustrialization of America. Review of Policy Research, 2(4), 677–694. Retrieved from: http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v2y1983i4p677–694.html (Date of access: 10.09.2020)
Fernandes, C., Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. J., Asheim, B. & Rutten, R. (2020). Regional innovation systems: what can we learn from 25 years of scientific achievements? Regional studies, 55(3), 377–389. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782878.
Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 576.
Habanik, J., Grencikova, A. & Krajco, K. (2019). The Impact of New Technology on Sustainable Development. Inzinerine ekonomika-Engineering economics, 30(1), 41–49. DOI: doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.1.20776.
Johnston, A. & Wells, P. (2020). Assessing the role of universities in a place-based Industrial Strategy: Evidence from the UK. Local economy, 35(4), 384–402. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0269094220957977.
Khalimova, S. R. (2016). Assessment of Russian regions by level of innovative development. Regional Research of Russia, 6, 115–124. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970516020040.
Kroll, H. & Neuhausler, P. (2020). Recent Trends of Regional Development in China — Technological Portfolios and Economic Growth. Zeitschrift fur wirtschaftsgeographie, 64(1), 14–27. DOI: doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018–0032.
Lavrikova, Yu. G., Akberdina, V. V. & Suvorova, A. V. (2019). Coordinating the Priorities of Scientific, Technological and Spatial Development of Industrial Regions. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 15(4), 1022–1035. DOI: 10.17059/2019–4-5. (In Russ.)
Litvinenko, I. L., Arefev, P. V., Kriklivaya, M. G., Solovykh, N. N. & Smirnova, I. (2020). Human potential in the context of clusterization of Russian economy. Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 7(2), 134.
Madsen, J. B., Ang, J. B. & Banerjee, R. (2010). Four centuries of British economic growth: the roles of technology and population. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 263–290. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10887–010–9057–7.
Makarova, I. V. & Korovin, G. B. (2014). Economic trends of neo-industrialization of the old industrial regions. Regionalnaya ekonomika. Teoriya i praktika [Regional Economics: Theory and Practice], 31(358), 2–13. (In Russ.)
Malcev, N. V. & Shaybakova, L. F. (2020) Evaluation of the innovative activity efficiency while developing the sectoral technology policy in the region. In: D. Solovev (Ed.), Smart Technologies and Innovations in Design for Control of Technological Processes and Objects: Economy and Production. FarEastСon 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 138 (pp. 858–868). Springer, Cham.
Popov, A. I. (2014). Neoindustrialization of the russian economy as a condition for sustainable development. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 3(87), 7–12. (In Russ.)
Popovich, A., Kolomiychuk, T. & Marschev, K. (2020). Modern human, problems of development, education and socialization in the society. Sciences of Europe, 47–3(47), 53–59.
Rastvortseva, S. N. (2018). Theoretical aspects of the possibility of the regional economy leaving the trajectory of the previous development. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 15(4), 633–642. DOI: 10.31063/2073–6517/2018.15–4.8. (In Russ.)
Romanova, O. A. & Ponomareva, A. O. (2019). Theoretical, Institutional and Ethical Basis for Implementing Modern Industrial Policy. Part I. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 15(1), 13–28. DOI: 10.17059/2019–1-2. (In Russ.)
Rudychev, А. А., Romanovich, L. G. & Romanovich, M. A. (2013). Incentives for innovative activity of young scientists on the basis of higher educational institutions in Russia. Experience of Belgorod state technological university named after V. G. Shukhov. World Applied Sciences Journal, 25(12), 1754–1757.
Ryazanov, V. T. (2014). New industrialization of Russia: strategic purposes and the current priorities. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [The economic revival of Russia], 2(40), 17–25. (In Russ.)
Sukharev, O. S. & Voronchikhina, E. N. (2019). Industrialization of the regions of Russia: structural evaluation by general and special aggregate criteria. Vestnik IE RAN [The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 1, 9–33. (In Russ.)
Tatarkin, A. I. (2015). New industrialization of the Russian economy: development deeds and/or time challenges. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [The economic revival of Russia], 2(44), 20–31. (In Russ.)
Tipayalai, K. (2020). Impact of international labor migration on regional economic growth in Thailand. Journal of Economic Structures, 9, 15. DOI: doi.org/10.1186/s40008–020–00192–7.
Ulbrych, M. (2020). Progress in Achieving Sustainable Industrial Development — the Case of the Czech Republic and Poland. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 23(4), 109–128. DOI: doi.org/10.18778/1508–2008.23.30.
Zakharova, Z. A. & Bogatyrev, V. V. (2020). Economic contradictions in the regions that lack the capacity of self-development. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Growth Poles of the Global Economy: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives (pp. 637–646). Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Luxembourg.
Zyablyuk, R. T. & Titova, N. I. (2016). The neoindustrialization of Russian economy: necessity and possibility (review of the roundtable on neoindustrialization of Russian economy). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika [Moscow University Economic Bulletin], 2, 119–135. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Economy of Regions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
