Regional Analysis of Digital Inclusion in the C2C Market of Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-2-10Keywords:
digital inclusion, C2C Internet market, Russian regions, online classifieds, digital economy, entrepreneurial potential of regions, digital platformsAbstract
Economy digitalisation creates new market mechanisms and regional development opportunities. In certain circumstances, the C2C (consumer-to-consumer) Internet market can act as a basis for establishing an entrepreneurial culture; subsequently, it can turn into an economic growth point of a region. However, since the entrepreneurial potential of regional digital markets varies, it is crucial to investigate these differences and the reasons for their occurrence. In the present study, the entrepreneurial potential of residents is measured through their digital inclusion in C2C Internet markets. The article analyses and characterises the active sellers of the Avito online classified in Russian regions. The data were collected using the content analysis of ads posted by individuals on the Avito platform (n = 1,597). Correlation and factor analysis were used for interpretation. The conducted analysis showed the following results. First, the study revealed a relationship between regional digitalisation and the size of the group of active sellers: a higher level of digitalisation of a territory (federal district) means that more residents start to actively use Avito for e-commerce. Second, the paper demonstrated the importance of locality, since the number of active sellers among Avito users is bigger in large cities. Third, it was proved that additional opportunities provided by the C2C market are more attractive for women than for men. The obtained findings can be used by authorities planning the regional development, as well as by researchers of the Internet economy describing and analysing the digitalisation processes. Further studies may identify and examine in detail the factors defining digital inclusion in C2C markets of Russian regions.
References
Aguilera, F. J. G., Olivencia, J. J. L., Fontoura, E. E. & Fontoura, F. A. P. (2021). Social inclusion of rural women through digital literacy programs for employment. Revista complutense de educacion, 32(1), 15–25. DOI: 10.5209/rced.67590. (In Spanish)
Arroyo, L. (2020). Implications of Digital Inclusion: Digitalization in Terms of Time Use from a Gender Perspective. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 180–189. DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2546.
Beaunoyer, E., Dupere, S. & Guitton, M. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in human behavior, 111, 106242. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424.
Borg, K., Boulet, M. & Smith, L. (2019). Digital Inclusion & Health Communication: A Rapid Review of Literature. Health Communication, 34(11), 1320–1328. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1485077.
Faraj, S., Renno W. & Bhardwaj, A. (2021). Unto the breach: What the COVID-19 pandemic exposes about digitalization. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100337. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoorg.2021.100337.
Gonzalez, M. V., Martinez, R. G. & Perez, M. G. (2020). Perceptions of social educators about digital leisure for the inclusion of socially disadvantaged young people. Pedagogia Social Revista Interuniversitaria, 36, 97–110. DOI: 10.7179/PSRI_2020.36.06.
Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2885.2012.01416.x.
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T. & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.
Lai, J. & Widmar, N. O. (2021). Revisiting the Digital Divide in the COVID-19 Era. Applied economic perspectives and policy, 43(1), 458–464. DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13104.
Lysova, T. (2018). Use of Internet services and factors affecting the variety thereof. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions], 1–2(126), 133–144. DOI: 10.24411/2070–5107–2018–00008. (In Russ.)
Marshall, A., Dezuanni, M., Burgess, J., Thomas, J. & Wilson, C. K. (2020). Australian farmers left behind in the digital economy — Insights from the Australian Digital Inclusion Index. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 195–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.001.
Mirolyubova, T. V., Karlina, T. V. & Nikolaev, R. S. (2020). Digital Economy: Identification and Measurements Problems in Regional Economy. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 16(2), 377–390. DOI: 10.17059/2020–2-4. (In Russ.)
Patricio, M. R. & Gil, H. (2021). Digital inclusion: Education Policies and Proposals for Ageing Territories. Revista Educa Online, 15(1), 97–114.
Norris, N. (2001). Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 320.
Plotichkina, N. V. (2020). Digital inclusion: theoretical reflection and public policy. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science], 58, 216–226. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/58/20. (In Russ.)
Ragnedda, M. & Muschert, G. W. (2018). Theorizing Digital Divides. London: Routledge, 218.
Rodriguez-Diaz, M. R. & Jimenez-Cortes, R. (2020). Digital inclusion of women in the Spanish policies of the society of the information. Athenea Digital, 20(2), e2702. DOI: 10.5565/rev/athenea.2702. (In Spanish)
Samkaev, A. R., Gryaznov, A. N., Khajrullina, A. R. & Baskakova, V. E. (2017). An innovative perspective on inclusion. Aktualnye problemy innovatsionnogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Actual problems of innovative pedagogical education], 3, 37–41. (In Russ.)
Sant’Ana, D. A., Pache, M. C. B., Borges, P. P. & Dias J. L. E. (2021). Accessibility and digital inclusion in Brazil and South Korea: A comparison between micro and macro territorial approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102524. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102524.
Shek, D. (2021). COVID-19 and Quality of Life: Twelve Reflections. Applied research in quality of life, 16(1), 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s11482–020–09898-z.
Srouji, J. (2020). Digital Payments, the Cashless Economy, and Financial Inclusion in the United Arab Emirates: Why Is Everyone Still Transacting in Cash? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), 260. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm13110260.
Thompson, K. M. & Paul, A. (2020). Factors of Digital Inclusion among Women: Revisiting India and Extending to Chile and Australia for Additional Analysis. Library quarterly, 90(2), 173–188. DOI: 10.1086/707673.
