The Innovation Paradigm of New Industrialization in the Conditions of the Integrated World Economic Way
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-25Keywords:
innovations, new industrialization, technical and economic paradigm, innovation paradigm, 4.0 industry, strategy, human potential, ecology of technologies, world economic way, inclusive and extractive institutesAbstract
The article emphasizes the importance of the concept of «technical and economic paradigm», which characterizes the certain stage of the world economy development associated with the corresponding technological revolution. The paper reveals the feature of the modern technical and economic paradigm development connected with new concepts determining a priority of general values. The author states the hypothesis that in the conditions of the emergence of the fourth industrial revolution elements (so-called 4.0 industry), it is fair to consider the innovation paradigm of development as the foundation of the new industrialization which preceds this revolution. The author considers new industrialization as the process contributing to the global technological parity of Russia and the countries-technological leaders. The most significant statements from this post of view are allocated: consideration of new industrialization as a process of continuous innovations and distribution of breakthrough technologies, computerization of production, robotization, cross-disciplinary nature of high technologies, the ecology of technologies, intellectualization of the potential of all persons occupied in industrial production, etc. The author analyses strategic documents connected with the development of innovative activities in Russia. The paper emphasizes that the indicators characterizing these activities do not allow to rank Russia as a country having the developed innovative economy. The article reveals the possibilities of the activation of innovative activities in Russia connected to the development of the approved private priorities in the main spheres of activity with the state priorities of social development; with construction of integrated strategy of a scientific and technological, institutional and industrial development of the country; with creation of the system of scientific monitoring allowing to adjust the necessary corrective actions in time. The article emphasizes a dominant nature of the institutional environment predetermining a success of socio-economic and innovative development of national economy. New integrated world economic way is forming in the conditions of the increasing importance of an innovation paradigm. The successfulness of its implementation is determined by a ratio of the inclusive (involving) and extractive (taking out) economic and political institutes.References
Peres, K. (2011). Tekhnologicheskie revolyutsii i finansovyy kapital. Dinamika puzyrey i periodov protsvetaniya. In Russian [Technological revolutions and financial capital. Dynamics of bubbles and periods of prosperity]. Moscow: Delo RANKhiGS Publ., 232.
Ivanov, V. V. (2016). Problemy nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossii v kontekste promyshlennoy revolyutsii. In Russian [Problems of scientific technology development of Russia in the context of industrial revolution]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 6(212), 3–8.
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Stage of the Industry. Annual Worldwide Progress Report. Wohlers Report 2013. Fort Collins: Wohlers Associates, 2013. — P. 122–125.
Shekhovtsov, M. (2016). Chto sulit miru mir internet-veshchey. In Russian [What may offer the world of internet of things to us?]. Ekspert [Expert], 48(1009), (28 noyab. — 4 dek.), 15–22.
Romanova, O. A., Akberdina, V. V. & Bukhvalov, N. Yu. (2016). Obshchie tsennosti v formirovanii sovremennoy tekhniko-ekonomicheskoy paradigmy. In Russian [General values in forming of a modern technical and economic paradigm]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyye peremeny. Fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and social changes. Facts, tendencies, forecast], 3, 173–190.
Leijonhufvud, C., O’Donohoe, N., Saltuk, Y., Bugg-Levine, A. & Brandenburg, M. (2010). Impact Investment. J. P. Morgan Global Research. Retrieved from: http://ventureatlanta.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/JP-Morgan-impact_investments_nov2010.pdf (date of access: 14.01.2017).
Bukhvalov, N. Yu. (2016). Impakt-menedzhment i ierarkhichnost multi-intellektualnoy sistemy upravleniya vysokotekhnologichnym predpriyatiem. In Russian [Impact-management and hierarchy of a multi-intellectual management system of high-technology enterprise]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of economic theory], 2, 48–56.
Miles, I. (2010). The development of technology foresight: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1448–1456.
Vecchiato, R. & Roveda, C. (2010). Foresight in corporate organizations. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(1), 99–112.
Lepsky, V. E. (2010). Refleksivno-aktivnye sredy innovatsionnogo razvitiya. In Russian [Reflexive and active environments of innovative development]. Moscow: Kognito-Tsentr Publ., 255.
Betelin, V. B. (2016). Itogi nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo i innovatsionnogo razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii v 2006–2016 gg. In Russian [Results of scientific and technological and innovative development of economy of Russia in 2006–2016]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 6(212), 9–16.
Karlik, A. & Platonov, V. (2016). Setevaya organizatsiya kak mekhanizm promyshlennogo razvitiya. In Russian [Network organization as a mechanism of industrial development]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Problem of the theory and practice of management], 9, 92–102.
Ivanov, V. V. & Malinetskiy, G. G. (2016). Rossiya. XXI vek. Strategiya proryva. Tekhnologii, obrazovanie, nauka. In Russian [Russia. 21st century. Breakthrough strategy. Technologies, education, science]. Moscow: Lenand Publ., 304.
Ivanov, V. V. (2015). Innovatsionnaya paradigma. XXI. 2-e izd. In Russian [Innovative paradigm. 21. 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 383.
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2016). Poslednyaya mirovaya voyna. SShA nachinayut i proigryvayut. In Russian [Last world war. The USA begins and loses]. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir Publ., 512.
Malinetskiy, G. (2016). Strategiya razgroma. In Russian [Strategy of defeat]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 6(212), 17–23.
Orekhova, S. V. & Romanova, O. A. (2016). Transformation of an Industrial Enterprise’s Business Model at Different Stages of the Life Cycle. Upravlenets, 5(63), 2–15.
Adzhemoglu, D. & Robinson, Dzh. A. (2015). Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nishchety. In Russian [Why some countries are rich, and other are poor. An origin of the power, prosperity and poverty]. Trans. from Litvinov, D., Sanovich S., Mironov P. Moscow: AST Publ., 770.
Arrigi, Dzh. (2006). Dolgiy dvadtsatyy vek. In Russian [Long twentieth century]. Moscow: Territoriya Budushchego Publ., 472.
Sorokin, P. (1997). Glavnyye tendentsii nashego vremeni. In Russian [Main tendencies of our time]. Moscow: Nauka Publ.
Geng, Y. et al. (2016). Recent progress on innovative eco-industrial development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 1–10.
Fais, B., Sabio, N. & Strachan, N. (2016). The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets. Applied Energy, 162, 699–712.
Fligstin, N. (2013). Arkhitektura rynkov. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya kapitalisticheskikh obshchestv XXI veka. In Russian [Architecture of the markets. Economic sociology of capitalist societies of the 21st century]. Moscow: NIU VShE Publ., 392.
Fonotov, A. (2015). Strategicheskie orientiry innovatsionnoy politiki. In Russian [Strategic objectives of innovative policy]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problem of forecasting], 5, 40–51.
Fonotov, A. (2016). Strategiya — 2035. Zhelaemoye. Vozmozhnoye. Dostizhimoye. In Russian [Strategy — 2035. Desirable. Possible. Achievable]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 6(212), 24–31.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Olga Aleksandrovna Romanova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
