Structural Change of Gross Regional Product in the Subjects of Ural Federal District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-7Keywords:
gross regional product, Ryabtsev index, Szalai index, index of structure, Urals Federal District, convergence of structure, strategy of regional development, diversification of economy, economic region, balanced structureAbstract
The important factor of the stability of the national economy is the adaptive capability of regional economies to damping of external and internal factors of risk. It occurs thanks to the variety of the developed industry structures of the economy in regions as well as to the constant process of their transformation that finds reflection in the structure of the gross regional product (GRP). It is possible to consider three main strategies of the development of the structure of regional economy: 1 the reduction of the economies of regions to the balanced condition; 2 the emphasis on the individualization of the structure of regional economy; 3 the combined strategy, when regions with various structure of economy are integrated into macro-regions in which there is a compilation of structure. In the latter case, this can result in both the leveling of the GRP structure of the territorial subjects of the Russian Federation included in the region and its convergence to macro-region indicators, in general (for example, to the federal district's indicators). For the confirmation of this hypothesis, the analysis of GRP of the subjects included in the Ural Federal District for the period of2005-2014 is carried out. As a result, a number of conclusions are formulated. Thus, the measurements with the use of the Ryabtsev Index and Szalai Index have shown that the GRP structure of autonomous areas is most close to the GRP structure of the federal district. At the same time, during the analyzed period, there was a reducing in a share of mining operations along with the increase in a share of GRP types referred to the auxiliary and social component of economic activity. In the federal district, there is a slow movement to a more balanced participation of regions of the district in the generation of GRP total amount. When using the authors index of the structure determined by the double calculation of the sum of squared deviations, the tendency towards the leveling of the GRP structure of the federal district, in general, is revealed. The results of the research can be applied when carrying out different types of the analysis of dynamics and structure of socio-economic indexes.References
Henzel, S. R., Lehmann, R. & Wohlrabe, K. (2015). Nowcasting Regional GDP: The Case of the Free State of Saxony. CESifo Working Paper, 5336, 27.
Kholodilin, K. A., Kooths, S. & Siliverstovs, B. (2008). A Dynamic Panel Data Approach to the Forecasting of the GDP of German Länder. Spatial Economic Analysis, 3(2), 195–207. DOI: 10.1080/17421770801996656.
Kopoin, A., Moran, K. & Paré, J.P. (2013). Forecasting regional GDP with factor models: How useful are national and international data? Economics Letters, 121(2), 267–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.08.007.
Lehmann, R. & Wohlrabe, K. (2014). Forecasting gross value-added at the regional level: Are sectoral disaggregated predictions superior to direct ones? Review of Regional Research, 34(1), 61–90. DOI: 10.1007/s10037–013–0083–8.
Longhi, S. & Nijkamp, P. (2007). Forecasting Regional Labor Market Developments under Spatial Autocorrelation. International Regional Science Review, 30(2), 100–119.
Patuelli, R., Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., Reggiani, A. & Blien, U. (2007). A Rank-Order Test on the Statistical Performance of Neural Network Models for Regional Labor Market Forecasts. Review of Regional Studies, 37(1), 64–81.
Schanne, N., Wappler, R. & Weyh, A. (2010). Regional unemployment forecasts with spatial interdependencies. International Journal of Forecasting, 26(4), 908–926. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.07.002.
Girardin, E. & Kholodilin, K. A. (2011). How Helpful are Spatial Effects in Forecasting the Growth of Chinese Provinces? Journal of Forecasting, 30(7), 622–643. DOI: 10.1002/for.1193.
Kramorenko, M. I. (2014). Otsenka tendentsiy ekonomicheskoy differentsiatsii regionov Severo-Zapadnogo i Tsentralnogo federalnykh okrugov [Assessment of Tendencies of Economic Differentiation of Regions of Northwest and Central Federal Districts]. Upravlencheskoye konsultirovanie [Managerial consultation], 3, 89–99. (In Russ.)
Shhepanjak, O., Bystraja, Ju. S. & Makarenya, T. A. (2014) Analiz i kharakteristika struktury VRP Sibirskogo federalnogo okruga [Analysis and characteristic of structure of VRP of Siberian Federal District]. Ekonomika i sotsium [Economy and society], 4–5, 530–533. (In Russ.)
Sharonina, L. V. & Bondarenko, D. A. (2015). Prichiny stagnatsii ekonomiki i problemy Uralskogo federalnogo okruga [The reasons of stagnation of economy and a problem of Ural federal district]. Ekonomika i sotsium [Economy and society], 2–5, 84–87. (In Russ.)
Bredneva, L. B. (2013). O mezhregionalnoy ekonomicheskoy differentsiatsii v Dalnevostochnom federalnom okruge [About interregional economic differentiation in the Far East federal district]. Aktualnyye voprosy ekonomicheskikh nauk [Topical issues of economic sciences], 35, 67–71. (In Russ.)
Maksimets, N. V. & Bukatina, E. G. (2016). Dinamika pokazateley ekonomicheskogo rosta regionov Privolzhskogo federalnogo okruga [Dynamics of Economic Growth Indicators in the Volga Federal District.]. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Economics and Management], 1, 75–86. (In Russ.)
Tarasov, V. T., Boyko, I. I. & Haritonova, V. G. (2015). Neravnomernost modernizatsii regionov Privolzhskogo federalnogo okruga [Uneven modernization of Volga federal district regions]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 1, 11–19. (In Russ.)
Shamilev, S. R. (2015). Prioritetnyye napravleniya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya subektov Severo-Kavkazskogo federalnogo okruga [Priority directions of economic development of regions of the Russian Federation]. Ekonomika. Biznes. Informatika [Economics. Business. Informatics], 5, 57–64. (In Russ.)
Kataev, E. N. & Pogodina, E. A. (2014). Ekonomicheskie i sotsialnyye razlichiya regionov Severo-Zapadnogo federalnogo okruga: analiz, otsenka, resheniya [Еconomic and social differences in the regions of Northwest Federal District: analysis, assessment, solutions]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global economic system], 4, 36–45. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu3.2014.4.4. (In Russ.)
Burchak, V. S. & Saliychuk, V. F. (2008). Ekonomika Uralskogo federalnogo okruga: osobennosti i dinamika struktury (1999–2005 gg.) [Economics of the Ural Federal District: features and dynamics of structure (1999–2005)]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment [Bulletin of South Ural State University, Series “Economics and Management”], 20, 10–16. (In Russ.)
Tikunov, V. S. & Chereshnya, O. Yu. (2015). Indeks ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Economic index for the regions of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 5: Geografiya [Moscow university geography bulletin], 6, 41–47. (In Russ.)
Kudymov, V. M. & Panfilov, V. S. (2011). Dva metoda kosvennogo otsenivaniya VRP [Two methods of indirect estimation of VRP]. Nauchnyye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN [Scientific works: Institute of Economic Forecasting of RAS], 9, 384–397. (In Russ.)
Ryabtsev, V. M. & Chudilin, G. I. (2001). Regionalnaya statistika: Uchebnik. [Regional statistics: Textbook]. In: V. M. Ryabtsev, G. I. Chudilin (Eds). Moscow, 380. (In Russ.)
Stewart, J. (2006). Assessing alternative dissimilarity indexes for comparing activity profiles. International Journal of Time Use Research, 3(1), 49–59.
Tatarkin, A. I., Davankov, A. Yu., Pryakhin, G. N., Sedov, V. V. & Shumakov, A. Yu. (Eds). (2016). Upravlenie sbalansirovannym razvitiem territorialnykh sistem: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Management of the balanced development of territorial systems: questions of the theory and practice]. Chelyabinsk: ChelGU Publ., 295. (In Russ.)
Baltagi, B. H., Fingleton, B. & Pirotte, A. (2014). Estimating and Forecasting with a Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Model. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 112–138. DOI: 10.1111/obes.12011
24. Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., Reggiani, A. & Maierhofer, E. (2005). Neural Network Modeling as a Tool for Forecasting Regional Employment Patterns. International Regional Science Review, 28(3), 330–346.
Tatarkin, A. I., Romanova, O. A. & Akberdina, V. V. (2014). Tekhnologicheskie i prostranstvennyye vozmozhnosti novoy industrializatsii promyshlennykh regionov [Technological and spatial capabilities of new industrialization of industrial regions]. Federalizm [Federalism], 3, 45–56. (In Russ.)
Animitsa, E. G., Animitsa, P. E. & Denisova, O. Yu. (2014). Evolyutsiya nauchnykh vzglyadov na teoriyu razmeshcheniya proizvoditelnykh sil [Evolution of knowledge about distribution of productive forces]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2(38), 21–32. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Valeriy Vladimirovich Gamukin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
