Paradigm of Managerial Education for a Technological Breakthrough in the Economy

Authors

  • Leonid Davidovich Gitelman Ural Federal University
  • Mikhail Viktorovich Kozhevnikov Ural Federal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-2-8

Keywords:

managerial education, technological breakthrough, paradigm, anticipatory learning, pre-emptive management, competencies, interdisciplinarity, teaching method, educational product, multi-project

Abstract

The article presents the results of the authors’ research into ways of improving managerial education and organization of anticipatory learning that are required for achieving a technological breakthrough in the national economy. The authors prove that in order to address complex tasks associated with modernization and emergence of Industry 4.0, to make decisions under uncertainty, unpredictable changes and considerable risk, managers need to possess interdisciplinary competencies in engineering and economics and pre-emptive action. The authors’ hypothesis that calls for change in managerial education is based on the idea that the new generation of managers will engage in the complex processes of creating fundamentally new technologies and markets as well as of modernizing the existing industries. To verify the hypothesis, we performed an analysis of development trends in global managerial education and universities’ responses to new challenges. The analysis allowed identifying the key characteristics of educational models employed by leading universities. They are focus on breakthrough technologies as well as on design and research component, orientation to cross-disciplinary educational products. The results of the analysis and surveys of experts have enabled the authors to determine the content of relevant interdisciplinary competencies for a technological breakthrough and to formulate the principles of anticipatory learning. These principles are represented in the organized process of creating knowledge and competences for addressing future problems corresponding to global trends and national development programs. The article describes the experience of the Research and Educational Centre for Interdisciplinary Investigations and Educational Programs (REC ENGEC) at the Ural Federal University in implementing a new paradigm of managerial education. It was designed within the framework of the research field «Pre-emptive management in rapidly developing industries» and the multi-project «New leaders for technological breakthrough». Overall, the results are of interest to the universities, including corporate ones, as well as to innovative business structures and research institutes participating in the process of transformation of educational models to response the new challenges of the technological revolution.

Author Biographies

Leonid Davidovich Gitelman, Ural Federal University

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management System, Ural Federal University; Scopus Author ID: 55806230600 (19, Mira St., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation; e-mail: ldgitelman@gmail.com).

Mikhail Viktorovich Kozhevnikov, Ural Federal University

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, Ural Federal University; Scopus Author ID: 55805368400 (19, Mira St., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russian Federation; e-mail: np.fre@mail.ru).

References

Novyye proizvodstvennyye tekhnologii: publichnyy analiticheskiy doklad [New production technologies: public analytical report]. (2015). Moscow: Delo Publ., RANKhiGS Publ., 272. (In Russ.)

Katkalo, V. S. & Volkova, D. L. (2017). Korporativnoye obuchenie dlya tsifrovogo mira [Corporate training for the digital world]. Moscow: ANO DPO Sberbank corporate university Publ., 200. (In Russ.)

Buble, M. (2015). Tendencies in evolution of 21st century management. Management, 20, 1–17.

Gitelman, L. D., Gavrilova, T. B., Gitelman, L. M. & Kozhevnikov, M. V. (2017). Proactive Management In The Power Industry: Tool Support. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(8), 1359–1369. doi: 10.2495/SDP-V12-N8–1359–1369.

Knyaginin, V. N. & Kholkina, D. V. (Eds). (2017). Tsifrovoy perekhod v elektroenergetike Rossii. Ekspertno-analiticheskiy doklad [Digital transition in Russian electric power industry]. Moscow: Tsentr strategicheskikh razrabotok Publ., 47. (In Russ.)

Schönmann, A., Greitemann, J. & Reinhart, G. (2016). Proactive Management of Production Technologies: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia CIRP, 52, 198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.011.

Scholten, D. & Künneke, R. (2016). Towards the Comprehensive Design of Energy Infrastructures. Sustainability, 8, 1291. doi: 10.3390/su8121291.

Giret, A., Garcia, E. & Botti, V. (2016). An engineering framework for Service-Oriented Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Computers in Industry, 81, 116–127. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.02.002.

Mcintyre, D. P. & Srinivasan, A. (2017). Networks, platforms, and strategy: emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 141–160. doi: 10.1002/smj.2596.

Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2017). Why Every Organization Needs an Augmented Reality Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 6, 46–57.

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003.

Gitelman, L. D., Gitelman, L. M. & Kozhevnikov, M. V. (2018). Managers for Sustainable Electric Power Industry of Tomorrow. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(2), 307–315. doi: 10.2495/SDP-V13-N2–307–315.

Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition. Harvard Business Review, 11, 64–88.

Okhtilev, M. Yu., Mustafin, N. G., Miller, V. E. & Sokolov, B. V. (2014). Kontseptsiya proaktivnogo upravleniya slozhnymi obektami. Teoreticheskie i tekhnologicheskie osnovy [Concept of Proactive Control over Complex Objects: Theoretical and Technological Basis]. Izvestiya vuzov. Priborostroenie [Journal of Instrument Engineering], 57(11), 7–15. (In Russ.)

Schoemaker, P. J. H., Day, G. S. & Snyder, S. A. (2013). Integrating Organizational Networks, Weak Signals, Strategic Radars and Scenario Planning. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80, 815–824. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.020.

Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D. & Mourtzis, D. (2013). Manufacturing Systems: Skills & Competencies for the Future. Procedia CIRP, 7, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.004.

Anderson, L., Mason, K., Hibbert, P. & Rivers, C. (2017). Management Education in Turbulent Times. Journal of Management Education, 41(2), 303–306. doi: 10.1177/1052562916682208.

Ferguson, D. & Fernández, R. E. (2015). The Role of the University in the Innovation Ecosystem, and Implications for Science Cities and Science Parks: A Human Resource Development Approach. WTR, 4, 132–143. doi: 10.7165/wtr2015.4.3.132.

Fuchs, W. (2012). The New Global Responsibilities of Engineers Create Challenges for Engineering education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6, 111–113. doi: 10.1177/097340821100600117.

Zsolnai, L. & Tencati, A. (Eds). (2009). The Future International Manager. A Vision of the Roles and Duties of Management. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 198.

Santandreu-Mascarell, C., Canós-Darós, L. & Pons-Morera, C. (2011). Competencies and skills for future Industrial Engineers defined in Spanish degrees. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(1), 13–30. doi: 10.3926/jiem..v4n1.p13–30.

Shmatko, N. A. (2012). Kompetentsii inzhenernykh kadrov. Opyt sravnitelnogo issledovaniya v Rossii i stranakh ES [Competences of Engineers: Evidence from a Comparative Study for Russia and EU Countries]. Forsayt [Foresight and STI Governance], 6(4), 32–47. (In Russ.)

Gitelman, L. D., Magaril, E. R. & Khodorovsky, M. Ya. (2014). Mezhdistsiplinarnyy podkhod v formirovanii kompetentsiy menedzherov dlya innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Interdisciplinary approach to formation of managers’ competences for innovative economy]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 1(37), 174–184. (In Russ.)

Gitelman, L. D., Sandler, D. G., Gavrilova, T. B. & Kozhevnikov, M. V. (2017). Complex Systems Management Competency For Technology Modernization. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 12(4), 525–537. doi: 10.2495/DNE-V12-N4–525–537.

Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D. & Mourtzis, D. (2013). Manufacturing Systems: Skills & Competencies for the Future. Procedia CIRP, 7, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.004.

Exner, K., Schnürmacher, C., Adolphy, S. & Stark, R. (2017). Proactive maintenance as success factor for use-oriented Product-Service Systems. Procedia CIRP, 64, 330–335. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.024.

Jamshidi, M. (2007). Systems of Systems Engineering — Innovations for the 21st Century. Hoboken: Wiley, 616.

Blanchard, B. S. & Fabrycky, W. J. (2010). Systems Engineering and Analysis. Boston: Prentice Hall, 800.

Hitchins, D. (2007). Systems Engineering: A 21st Century Methodology. Chichester: Wiley, 528.

Gitelman, L. D., Isaev, A. P., Gavrilova, T. B. et al. (2014). Menedzhery novogo pokoleniya: peredovoye upravlencheskoye obrazovanie [Methodology of innovative management education]. In: L. D. Gitelman, A. P. Isaev (Eds). Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 168. (In Russ.)

Gitelman, L. D., Sandler, D. G. & Kozhevnikov, M. V. (2016). University technology platform of anticipatory learning. Economy of Region, 1, 257–266. doi: 10.17059/2016–1–20.

Published

29.05.2018

How to Cite

Gitelman, L. D., & Kozhevnikov, M. V. (2018). Paradigm of Managerial Education for a Technological Breakthrough in the Economy. Economy of Regions, 14(2), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-2-8

Issue

Section

Research articles