Model of Fiscal Sustainability of Enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-2-27Keywords:
fiscal sustainability, financial stability, factors, quantitative assessment, interrelation, indicators of fiscal sustainability assessment, deviation, model, management, imitating modellingAbstract
The paper substantiates the possibility and the necessity to introduce the notion of «fiscal sustainability». Fiscal sustainability is the company's ability to meet its tax obligations and to function normally according to its tasks, despite the influence of economic changes in external and internal environment. The investigation of the introduced category allowed making the following conclusions. Firstly, fiscal sustainability and financial sustainability are interdependent. Secondly, we defined the exogeneous and endogenous factors, which cause changements in the state of fiscal sustainability and predetermine its «contraction» and «expansion». Thirdly, the category of fiscal sustainability has local and global characteristics. And last, fiscal sustainability needs temporal characteristics: operational, tactical, and strategic ones, and quantitative representation. We propose the indicators for assessing the fiscal sustainability of an enterprise. The quantitative assessment of fiscal sustainability can be represented by the following indicators: the coverage ratio of tax payments; structural ratio of tax debt and paid tax payments; as well as the rate of tax debt growth. We present models for calculating these indicators values, and substantiate the possibility of their performance management. We assess planned and actual values for fiscal sustainability on the basis of the developed system of indicators, and then level the resulting deviations. This task is of a complex nature, covering all phases of the management of. Fiscal sustainability can be measured for different time periods. Therefore, the system of fiscal sustainability management refers to strategic, tactical and operational levels. The application of the research results will provide to the enterprises an opportunity to meet their tax obligations.References
Aristarkhova, M. K. & Zueva, M. S. (2014). Otsenka nalogovedeniya predpriyatiya [Assessment of enterprise’s tax activities]. Vestnik UGATU [Bulletin of the Ufa State Aviation Technical University], 1, 167–173. (In Russ.)
Aristarkhova, M. K., Zueva, M. S. & Perevezentseva, A. Yu. (2015). Nalogovaya ustoychivost kak odna iz kharakteristik nalogovedeniya predpriyatiya. Kontseptsiya ee otsenki [Tax stability as one of the characteristics of the enterprise’s taxation. The concept of its evaluation]. Sovremennaya nalogovaya sistema: sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Modern tax system: the state, problems and development prospects], 9, 7–17. (In Russ.)
Aristarkhova, M. K. & Poroshin, Yu. G. (2009). Modelirovanie pokazateley upravleniya innovatsionnoy deyatelnostyu promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Modelling of system of indicators of management by innovative activity of the industrial enterprise]. Vestnik UGATU [Bulletin of the Ufa State Aviation Technical University], 3(2), 88–97. (In Russ.)
Aristarkhova, M. K. & Gunyakova, A. A. (2010). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskiy aspekt korporativnogo nalogovogo menedzhmenta: monografiya [The organizational and economic aspect of corporate tax management: a monograph]. Ufimsk. gos. aviats. tekhn. un-t [Ufa state. aviats. tech. un-t]. Ufa : UGATU Publ., 171. (In Russ.)
Savitskaya, G. V. (2002). Analiz khozyaystvennoy deyatelnosti predpriyatiya [Analysis of the economic activity of the enterprise]. Minsk: Novoye znanie Publ., 704. (In Russ.)
Antysheva, E. R. (2006). Politika upravleniya finansovymi riskami na predpriyatii [The policy of financial risk management at the enterprise]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola [Siberian Financial School], 4, 77–78. (In Russ.)
Lapin, V. N. (2010). K voprosu o sisteme nalogovogo upravleniya [Tax administration system]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University], 4, 83–87. (In Russ.)
Tsibareva, M. E. (2008). Soderzhanie ponyatiya “ekonomicheskaya” firmy [Contents of the concept of «economic stability» of the firm]. Vestnik SamGU [Vestnik of Samara State University], 7, 195–202. (In Russ.)
Karataev, A. S. (2010). Faktory, vliyayushchie na nalogovyy potentsial krupneyshego nalogoplatelshchika [Factors which Influence the Development of Tax Opportunity of the Largest Taxpayer]. Finansy [Finance], 1, 42–47. (In Russ.)
Borodin, V. A. & Malakhov, P. V. (2009). Nalogovaya nagruzka kak sostavlyayushchaya finansovoy ustoychivosti predpriyatiya [Tax load as the component of the financial stability of the enterprise]. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice], 32, 10–16. (In Russ.)
Kvaginidze, V. S., Mansurov, A. A. & Cherkasov, A. V. (2011). Faktory i printsipy, opredelyayushchie kachestvo upravlencheskikh resheniy na predpriyatii [Factors and principles that determine the quality of managerial decisions at the enterprise]. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy zhurnal [Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin (Scientific and Technical Journal)], 12(3), 109–112. (In Russ.)
Kirov, A. V. (2011). Upravlenie finansovoy ustoychivostyu predpriyatiya: teoreticheskie aspekty [Financial stability management: theoretical aspects]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global economic system], 1, 155–159. (In Russ.)
Gukova, A. V., Kirov, A. V. (2011). Faktory finansovoj ustojchivosti firmy [Factors of enterprise financial stability]. Finansy i kredit [Finance and credit], 4 (21), 27-32.
Kuzmin, M. Yu. (2012). Faktory kachestva v kontseptsii razrabotki i prinyatii upravlencheskikh resheniy [Quality factors in the concept development and management decisions]. Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie [Modernization. Innovation. Research], 9, 118–120. (In Russ.)
Panyagina, A. E. (2013). Rezervirovanie kak metod upravleniya finansovymi riskami organizatsii [Reservation as a method of control over financial risks of the organization]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola [Siberian Financial School], 1, 61–64. (In Russ.)
Popova, G. L. (2014). Evolyutsiya traktovki kategorii “nalogovyy potentsial” [Evolution of interpretation of the tax potential category]. Finansy i kredit [Finance and credit], 38, 15–25. (In Russ.)
Sobchenko, N. V. (2011). Kompleksnaya metodika otsenki ekonomicheskoy ustoychivosti predpriyatiy na osnove innovatsionnoy aktivnosti [Complex technique of the estimation of economic stability of enterprises on the basis of innovative activity]. Nauchnyy zhurnal KubGAU [Scientific Journal of KubSAU], 67, 1–9. (In Russ.)
Belova, E. L. & Popelyshko, T. M. (2015). Upravlenie finansovoy ustoychivostyu organizatsii [Management of financial stability of the organization]. Sovremennaya nauka. Aktualnyye problemy i puti ikh resheniya [Modern science: actual problems and ways of their solution], 4, 115–118. (In Russ.)
Sushkova, I. (2012). Teoriya i praktika upravleniya nalogovymi riskami [Theory and practice of tax risk management]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta [Izvestiya of Saratov University], 1(12), 63–67. (Series: Economics. Management). (In Russ.)
Toporkov, A. M. (2010). Mekhanizm upravleniya ekonomicheskoy ustoychivostyu promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Regulation mechanism of enterprise’s economic stability]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University], 2, 80–82. (In Russ.)
Chekulaeva, E. N. (2012). Vyyavlenie i predotvrashchenie nalogovykh riskov v organizatsiyakh [Identification and prevention of tax risks in the organizations]. Vestnik Chuvashckogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chuvash University], 4, 505–509. (In Russ.)
Shmidt, A. V. (2011). Metody upravleniya ekonomicheskoy ustoychivostyu promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Methods of managing the economic stability of an industrial enterprise]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava [Economic and Law Issues], 3, 218–222. (In Russ.)
Nussim, J. & Tabbach, A. (2014). Tax-Loss Mechanisms. The University of Chicago Law Review, 81(4), 1509–1567.
Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M. & Maydew, E. (2010). The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163–1189.
Jorion, P. (2010). Risk Management. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2, 347–365.
Robinson, J., Sikes, S. & Weaver, C. (2010). Performance Measurement of Corporate Tax Departments. The Accounting Review, 85(3), 1035–1064.
Shin, H. (2009). Securitisation and Financial Stability. The Economic Journal, 119(536), 309–332.
Collis, D., Young, D. & Goold, M. (2007). The Size, Structure, and Performance of Corporate Headquarters. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 383–405.
Phillips, J. (2003). Corporate Tax-Planning Effectiveness: The Role of Compensation-Based Incentives. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 847–874.
Andrew, L. & Berkin, Ye. J. (2003). Tax Management, Loss Harvesting, and HIFO Accounting. Financial Analysts Journal, 59(4), 91–102.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Margarita Konstantinovna Aristarkhova, Olga Konstantinovna Zueva, Maria Sergeevna Zueva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
