Sociocultural Factors of Survival of Males and Females in Economically Active Age: a Regional Analysis

Authors

  • Evgeniya Khasanovna Tukhtarova Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Aleksandr Ivanovich Kuzmin Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University named after The First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
  • Natalya Pavlovna Neklyudova Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-9

Keywords:

census of population, generation, cohort, economically active age, mortality tables, probability of survival, econometric models, demographic transition, culture of self-preservation, individual value, region, healthy lifestyle, infant mortality, premature mortality, cohort analysis

Abstract

The period, when a person starts and completes his or her professional carrier and labour participation, in general, coincides with the age when the self-preservation behaviour develops. It is a time when a person aims for a healthy and safe lifestyle. During this period, an individual assumes the main standards, values of the self-preservation behaviour inherent in an ethnic, social and cultural macro-environment. To research the sociocultural factors of survival, we applied econometric modelling to demographic processes using the discrete and probabilistic indicators of the mortality tables of male and female in economically active age. The econometric model included the elements of spatiotemporal characteristics of territories. These characteristics are interrelated with the indicators of survival probability and the indicator of average life expectancy in the regions of Russia. We choose the major sociocultural factors by the correlation ratio of indicators and their sensitivity. The econometric analysis has revealed a high degree of sensitivity of a territorial variation of demographic and sociocultural factors in the regions of Russia, including a gender aspect. The most significant socio-economic factors, which determine the self-preservation behaviour of males, are the following: 1) the size of Gross Regional Product per capita; 2) quality of health infrastructure; 3) fixed investments; 4) population with monetary income under the subsistence minimum (share coefficient of income differentials). The female have the same hierarchy of socio-economic factors, except for the sensitivity of variables to the regional differentiation of signs. The household poverty factor has little significance for the women and it is the main difference between male and female. The built model has shown the predictive importance in the assessment of the above-mentioned factors in short and medium-term prospects.

Author Biographies

Evgeniya Khasanovna Tukhtarova, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Leading Economist, Isntitute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Scopus Author ID: 57190413880 (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: tyevgeniya@yandex.ru).

Aleksandr Ivanovich Kuzmin, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University named after The First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

PhD in Economics, Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Leading Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Professor, Institute of Public Administration and Entrepreneurship, Ural Federal University; Scopus Author ID: 56470348600 (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: kuz53@list.ru).

Natalya Pavlovna Neklyudova, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

PhD in Economics, Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS; Scopus Author ID: 57190430407 (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation; e-mail: nnp81@mail.ru).

References

Arkhangelsky, V. N. & Revun, V. I. (2008). Strategicheskie aspekty demograficheskoy politiki v Rossii i v Ukraine [Strategic aspects of the demographic policy in Russia and Ukrain]. Narodonaselenie [The Population], 3, 37–48. (In Russ.)

Archangelsky, V. N. & Dzhanaeva, N. G. (2015). Using Cohort Fertility Indicators To Assess And Predict The Effectiveness Of Demographic Policies. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 4, 170–184. (In Russ.)

Darsky, L. E. & Tolts, M. S. (2013). Demograficheskie tablitsy [Demographic tables]. In: Denisenko M. B. (Ed.). Moscow: MAKS Press, 104. (In Russ.)

Caldwell, J. C. (2005). On Net Intergenerational Wealth Flows: An Update. Population and development review, 31(4), 724–729.

Caldwell, J. C. (2008). Demographic Transition Theory. Population and Development Review, 34(2), 367–368.

Darskiy, L. E. (1971). Sotsialno-psikhologicheskie aspekty demograficheskogo povedeniya i ikh izuchenie [Socio-psychological aspects of demographic behavior and their study]. Problemy demografii. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Problems of demography. Theory and practice issues]. In: Broner D. L., Venetsky I. G. (Eds). Moscow: Statistika Publ., 169–170. (In Russ.)

Rimashevskaya, N. M. & Rusanova, N. E. (2015). Zdorovye rossiyskogo naseleniya v usloviyakh sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy modernizatsii [Health of the Russian population under the conditions of socio-economic modernization]. Narodonaselenie [The Population], 4, 33–42. (In Russ.)

Zivert, Sh., Zakharov, S. & Klingkholts, R. Ischezayushchaya mirovaya derzhava. Demograficheskoye budushcheye Rossii i drugikh byvshikh soyuznykh gosudarstv [Disappearing world power. Demographic future of Russia and other former Soviet States]. Berlin Institute for Population and Development. Retrieved from: https://www.berlin-institut.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Russland/Russland_rus_online.pdf (date of access: 1.08.2017). (In Russ.)

Yusupova, M. M. (2010). Osobennosti samosokhranitelnogo povedeniya naseleniya Chechenskoy respubliki v postkonfliktnyy period [Health behavior specifics in Chechen Republic — post-conflict period]. Cotsis [Sociological Studies], 7, 75–82. (In Russ.)

Antonov, A. I. (2013). Samosokhranitelnoye povedenie [Health behavior]. Demograficheskaya entsiklopediya [Demographic encyclopedia]. In: Tkachenko A. A., Anoshkin A. V., Denisenko M. B. et al. (Eds). Moscow: Entsiklopediya Publ., 725–726. (In Russ.)

Kuzmin, A. I. (1997). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie printsipy issledovaniya samosokhranitelnoy funktsii semyi: avtoref. diss. … d-ra sotsiol. nauk. [Theoretical and methodological principles of the research of the family’s self-protection. Doctoral thesis]. Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.)

Fenelon, A. (2013). Geographic divergence in mortality in the US. Population and development review, 39(4), 611–634.

Ryazantsev, S. V., Pismennaya, E. E & Khramova, M. N. (2015). Formirovanie migratsionnogo potentsiala sootechestvennikov v stranakh Tsentralnoy Azii [Formation of the migration potential of compatriots in the countries of Central Asia]. Narodonaselenie [The Population], 4, 58–67.

Vandeskrik, K. (2005). Demograficheskiy analiz [Demographic analysis]. Trans. from Franch N. Kalmykova. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ.; Gaudeamus Publ., 272. (In Russ.)

Minagawa, Y. (2013). Inequalities in Healthy Life Expectancy in Eastern Europe. Population and development review, 39(4), 650–651.

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and development review, 36(2), 211–245.

Kolbanov, V. F. & Rybakovsky, L. L. (2012). Demograficheskoye nastoyashcheye i budushcheye Rossii [Demohraphic present and future of Russia]. Moscow: Ekon-inform Publ., 417. (In Russ.)

David, P. Baker, J. L. et.al. (2011). The 314–316 The Education Effect on Populatin Health: A Reassessment. Population and development review, 37(2), 322–326.

Zlotnikov, A. G. (2014). Demograficheskie idei i kontseptsii [Demographic ideas and concepts]. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika Publ., 388. (Seires: Humanities). (In Russ.)

Riley James, C. (2005). The Timing and Pace of Health Transitions around the World. Population and development review, 31(4), 741–742.

Rubleva, M. E., Mazharov, V. F., Gavrikov, V. L. & Khlebopros, R. G. (2016). Fertility And Women Life Expectancy in Krasnoyarsk Territory: Social And Economic Transition And Intraregional Demographic Response. Zhurnal sibirskogo federalnogo universiteta [Journal of Siberian Federal University], 2742–2755. (Series: Humanities and Social Sciences).

Boeva, A. V., Goltsova, E. V ., Grigoryev, Yu. A., Leshchenko, O. Ya., Leshchenko, Ya. A., Rogacheva, O. A. & Ryashchenko, S. V. (2013). Razvitie chelovecheskogo potentsiala Sibiri. Problemy sotsialnogo vosproizvodstva regionalnogo soobshchestva [The development of human potential of Siberia: problems of social reproduction of the regional community]. Irkutsk: Ottisk Publ., 514. (In Russ.)

Edwards, R. D. (2011). Changes in world inequality in length of life: 1970–2000. Population & Development Review, 37(3), 499–528.

Ajzen, I. & Klobas, J. (2013). Review Article Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232.

Published

26.02.2018

How to Cite

Tukhtarova, E. K., Kuzmin, A. I., & Neklyudova, N. P. (2018). Sociocultural Factors of Survival of Males and Females in Economically Active Age: a Regional Analysis. Economy of Regions, 14(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-9

Issue

Section

Research articles