Is Tajikistan a Potential Market for Genetically Modified Potatoes?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-17Keywords:
genetically modified potatoes, consumer acceptance, willingness to pay, contingent valuation, consumer perceptions and attitudes, consumers, random utility model, initial bid, discount and premium, TajikistanAbstract
Consumer perception and willingness to pay for genetically modified foods have been extensively studied in recent years. However, until so far there is little empirical evidence for genetically modified food acceptance among Central Asian consumers. This article contributes to existing literature in this field by exploring consumers’ acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified potatoes in Tajikistan. A dichotomous-choice contingent valuation methodology is used as a primary empirical tool. The data was collected in a major city of Tajikistan. The results indicate that more than half of survey participants are not aware of genetically modified potatoes. Yet, the majority of consumers expressed a positive or neutral opinion about this particular product and for two-third of respondents no risks are associated with genetically modified potatoes. These results highlight that Tajik consumers seem to be less risk-averse towards genetically modified food than consumers in Europe. This study explores consumer preferences for genetically modified potatoes in Tajikistan. A contingent valuation method is applied to measure consumers’ willingness to pay for this particular genetically modified product based upon socio-demographic variables as well as predictors related to individuals’ attitudes and perceptions. Findings of the paper show the relevance and possibility to introduce and market nonconventional potato in a Central Asian market of Tajikistan.References
Pion, G., Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M. & Peluso, A. M. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2861–2869. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.008.
Canavari, M. & Nayga, R. M. (2009). On Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Food. Applied Economics, 41, 125–137. doi: 10.1080/00026840701367564.
James, C. (2015). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2014. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Retrieved from:
http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49/executivesummary/ default.asp (date of access: 20.03.2016).
Qaim, M. (2009). The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1(1), 665–694. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource/050708.144203.
Areal, F. J., Riesgo, L. & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2012). Economic and agronomic impact of commercialized GM crops: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 151, 7–33. doi: 10.1017/S0021859612000111.
Smyth, S. J., Kerr, W. A. & Phillips, P. W. B. (2015). Global economic, environmental and health benefits from GM crop adoption. Global Food Security, 7, 24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs/2015.10.002.
Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M. & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33(2), 99–111. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002.
Frewer, L. J., van der Lans, I. A., Fischer, A. R. H., Reinders, M. J., Menozzi, D., Zhang, X., van den Berg, I. & Zimmermann, K. L. (2013). Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification e a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 30(2), 142–152. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2013003.010.
Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L. Roucan, M. & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30, 28–44.
Li, Q., Curtis, K. R., McCluskey, J. J. & Wahl, T. I. (2002). Consumer Attitudes toward Genetically Modified Foods in China. AgbioForum: The Journal of Agro biotechnology Management and Economics, 5, 145–152.
Curtis, K. R., McCluskey, J. J. & Wahl, T. I. (2002). Is China the Market for Genetically Modified Potatoes? AgBioForum, 5(4), 175–178.
Anand, A., Mittelhammer, R. C. & McCluskey, J. J. (2007). Consumer Response to Information and Second-Generation Modified Food in India, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 5, 1–21. doi: 10.2202/1542–0485.1138.
Kimenju, S. C., & De Groote, H. (2008). Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food in Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 38, 35–46.
Vermeulen, H., Kristen, J. F. & Schonfeldt, H. (2005). Attitudes and acceptance of South African urban consumers towards genetically modified white maize. Agrekon, 44, 118–137.
Curtis, K. R. & Moeltner, K. (2007). The effect of consumer risk perceptions on the propensity to purchase genetically modified foods in Romania. Agribusiness, 23(2), 263- 278. doi: 10.1002/agr/20116.
Zaikin, A. A. & McCluskey, J. J. (2013). Consumer preferences for new technology: apples enriched with antioxidant coatings in Uzbekistan. Agricultural Economics, 44, 513–521.
Markosyan, A., McCluskey, J. J. & Wahl, T. (2009). Consumer response to information about a functional food product: apples enriched with antioxidants. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 325–341.
Bruschi, V., Shershneva, K., Canavari, M., Dolgopolova, I. & Teuber, R. (2015). Consumer perception of organic food in emerging markets: evidence from Saint Petersburg, Russia. Agribusiness, 31(3), 414–432.
Dolgopolova, I., Teuber, R., & Bruschi, V. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions of functional foods: trust and food-neophobia in a cross-cultural context. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6), 708–715. doi: 10.1111/iijcs.12184.
Colson, G. & Rousu, C. M. (2013). What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods. Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain, 4, 158–165. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.26322.
Hu, W. (2006). Use of spike models in measuring consumers’ willingness to pay for non-GM oil. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 38, 525–538.
Huang, J., Qiu, H., Bai, J. & Pray, C. (2006). Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China. Appetite, 46(2), 144–151.
Zhang, X., Huang, J., Qiu, H. & Huang, Z. (2010). A consumer segmentation study with regards to genetically modified food in urban China. Food Policy, 35(5), 456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.008.
Curtis, K. R. & Moeltner, K. (2006). Consumer Risk Perceptions: A Cross-Country Comparison. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 289–310.McCluskey, J. J., Grimsrud, K. M., Ouchi, H. & Wahl, T. I. (2003). Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Food Products in Japan. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32, 222–231.
Carlsson, F. (2011). Non-Market Evaluation: Stated Preference Methods. In: Lusk, J., J. Roosen & S. Fox. The Oxford Handbook on the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 7, 181–214.
Kanninen, B. J. (1993). Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics, 69(2), 138–146.
Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J. & Kanninen, B. J. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1255–1263.
Lopez-Feldman, A. (2012). Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata. MPRA Paper No. 41018. Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41018/ (date of access: 05.04.2016).
Grimsrud, M. K, McCluskey, J. J, Loureiro, M. L. & Wahl, T. I. (2004). Consumer Attitudes to Genetically Modified Food in Norway. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 75–90.
Chern, W. S., Rickertsen, K., Tsuboi, N. & Fu, T. (2002). Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and salmon: a multiple-country assessment. AgBioForum, 5(3), 105–112.
Kikulwe, E. M., Birol, E., Wesseler, J. & Falck-Zepeda, J. (2011). A latent class approach to investigating demand for genetically modified banana in Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 42, 547–600.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Mirzobobo Yormirzoev, Ramona Teuber, Daniil Sergeevich Baranov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
