Financial Guarantees of the Regional Budget are Growth Potential for the Investments in Fixed Capital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-1-25Keywords:
public debt, guarantees of regional budget, economic growth, gross domestic product, value added, fixed capital, fixed assets, property used to generate income, fiscal revenues of regional budgetAbstract
In accordance with the existing standards applied to estimate the performance of regional public authorities, the quantitative indexes comprise such variables as ‘amount of fixed investments’ and ‘the tax revenues of regional budgets’. To the authors’ opinion, these variables are in mathematical relations. We assume that such relations can be used to assess the financial tools, which are at the disposal of regional public authorities. We have developed a methodology for quantitative evaluation of the economic performance of the financial instruments, which are at the disposal of regional public authorities and can impact the economic growth. The research is based on the comparative statistical analysis of the National Statistical Monitoring System concerning the economic development of Belgorod region. As a result, we have determined the acceptable potential for the increase of the Belgorod region’s budget guarantees assigned for the implementation of major investment projects. We have obtained the dependency of the tax revenues of regional budgets on the fixed assets productivity (the fixed capital or property used to generate income). Our technique allows to evaluate the amount of fiscal revenues of the budget of a federal subject of the Russian Federation depending both on the financial guarantees assigned by the regional budgets and on the productivity of fixed assets (capital productivity). The research results show that up-to-date domestic practice in managing the economic growth in the federal subjects of Russia underestimates the financial guarantees performance. The financial guarantee instrument is prioritized for the major investment projects. These projects can ensure the yield from capital investments as many as four, which fosters the increase of the fiscal revenues of regional budgets up to 40 %. We have measured the economic performance of management decisions concerning the choice of financial instruments by regional public authorities. Moreover, the paper presents the projection of the results from each financial instrument application.References
Ivanter, V. V. & Panfilov, B. C. (2011). Konets ekonomiki rosta ili smena paradigmy razvitiya? [Is it the end of economic growth or the change of development paradigm?]. Vestnik RAN [Herald of the russian Academy of Sciences], 7, 594–598. (In Russ.)
Avtonomov, B. C. (2006). Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki [Methodological problems of contemporary economic science]. Vestnik RAN [Herald of the russian Academy of Sciences], 3, 203–208. (In Russ.)
Morozova, N. I. (2012). Vliyanie finansovykh vzaimootnosheniy byudzhetov razlichnykh urovney na kachestvo zhizni naseleniya [Influence of financial inter-relations of the budgets of different levels on the population life quality]. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. Vestnik Volgogradskogo institut biznesa [Business. Education. Low. Bulletin of the Volgograd Business Institute], 3, 131–134. (In Russ.)
Mokhnachev, S. A. & Mokhnacheva, E. S. (2009). Gosudarstvennyye regulyatory v regionalnoy sisteme predprinimatelstva [State regulators at the regional system of enterprises]. Pravo i ekonomika [Low and Economics], 8, 68–71. (In Russ.)
Morgoev, B. T. (2015). Gosudarstvennoye regulirovanie finansovoy samostoyatelnosti regionalnykh byudzhetov [State regulation of financial independence of regional budgets]. Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnyye nauki [Economic Science and Humanities], 12, 46–51. (In Russ.)
Tikhomirova, E. V. (2012). Optimizatsiya avtonomnosti mestnogo samoupravleniya [Optimization of the local self-government autonomy]. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. Vestnik Volgogradskogo institut biznesa [Business. Education. Low. Bulletin of the Volgograd Business Institute], 2, 140–143. (In Russ.)
Merzlov, I. Yu. (2015). Povyshenie effektivnosti realizatsii regionalnykh proektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva na osnove obosnovannogo vybora instrumentov privlecheniya investitsiy [The content of selection tool of attracting investments as a mean of improving regional public-private partnership projects implementation]. Fundamentalnyye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research], 11–2, 395–399. (In Russ.)
Venablies, A. (1997). The spread of industry spatial agglomeration in economic development. CEPR. Working Paper 2, 1354, 4–8.
Alfaro, L. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: Does the Sector Matter? Boston: Harvard Business School, 31, 7–12.
Faini, R. (1996). Increasing Returns, Migration and Convergence. Journal of Development Economics, 49, 121–136. doi:10.1016/0304–3878(95)00056–9.
Blomstrom, M. & Kokko, A. (2009). The Economics of Foreign Direct Investment Incentives. SSE. Working Paper, 168, 9–16.
Ellison, G. & Glaser, E. (1997). Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Firms: a Dartboard Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 889–927.
Tinbergen, J. & Bos, N. (1962). Mathematical Models of Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 136. DOI: 10.2307/1235537.
Lipsey, R. & Sjoholm, F. (2010). Host Country Impacts of Inward FDI: Why Such Different Answers? The European Institute of Japanese Studies, Working Paper series, 192, 10–22.
Bruce, A. & Blonigen, A. (2011). Review of the Empirical Literature on FDI Determinants. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33, 383–403.
Akopov, V. I. & Gadzhiev, Yu. A. (2008). Differentsiatsiya severnykh regionov po urovnyu sotsialnogo razvitiya [Differentiation of northern region on the level of social development]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Reigon], 1, 100–116. (In Russ.)
Ignatyeva, E. D. & Mariev, O. S. (2009). Metodologicheskie osnovy i instrumentariy otsenki potentsiala samorazvitiya regionalnykh sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem [Methodological principles and instruments of regional self-development potential analyses]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2, 116–129. (In Russ.)
Debok, G. & Kokhonen, T. (2001). Analiz finansovykh dannykh s pomoshchyu samoorganizuyushchikhsya kart [Analysis of financial data using self-organizing maps]. Moscow: Alpina Publ., 317. (In Russ.)
Zakharchuk, E. A. & Pasynkov, A. F. (2010). Priznaki i svoystva samorazvivayushchikhsya sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem [Attributes of self-developing socio-economic systems]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 4, 32–39. (In Russ.)
Tatarkin, A. I. & Doroshenko, S. V. (2011). Region kak samorazvivayushchayasya sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya sistema: perekhod cherez krizis [Region as a self-developing socio-economic system: crossing the crisis]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 1, 15–23. (In Russ.)
Makarov, V. L., Ayvazyan, S. A., Borisova, S. V. & Lakalin, E. A. Ekonometricheskaya model ekonomiki Rossii [Econometric model of the Russian economy]. Tsentr situatsionnogo analiza i prognozirovaniya TsEMI RAN [Centre for Situation Analysis RAS]. Retrieved from: http://data.cemi.rssi.ru/GRAF/home.htm (date of access: 14.12.2016). (In Russ.)
Uzyakov, M. N., Brusentseva, A. R., Govtvan, O. Dzh., Gusev, M. S., Kaminova, S. V., Mironova, E. S., Savchishi-
na K. E., Uzyakov, R. M. & Shirov, A. A. (2009). Prognoz makropokazateley ekonomiki Rossii na 2009–2012 gg. [Forecast of macroeconomic indicators of the Russian economy in 2009–2012]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 4, 3–25. (In Russ.)
Cobb, C. W. & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A Theory of Production. American Economic Review 18, 1, 139–165.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Vadim Nikolaevich Kabanov, Aleksandr Yuryevich Zhilnikov, Tatyana Yuryevna Zablotskaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
